It is not on the top of the to-do list at the moment. As we see it there are more important thing to do first. Doing it right is also quite tricky, most of the attempts you see around are a simplification of physics and 3D bending moments. Also, what you believe is a "must" is not necessary a "must" to others.
are you windows?
be sure you have set an entire folder exception for the entire /xplane 10/ folder under the windows defender otherwise the cpu may die while you do changes on the fmc inflight.
if you have also an antivirus be sure it is not scanning xplane.
hope this helps.
My post was to point out that I DO NOT have mountains of money.
Your rant does not even deserve to be addressed.
You have no idea how tempting it is to say "fuck it" and walk away every time an idiot likes you comes in hurling abuse.
When IXEG decides to employ a wing flex model, I'd highly recommend they buy a FlyJSim 732 and take note on how they did theirs. From what I understand, Jack used the X-Plane wing flex capabilities to create it. It came out really nice.
I respect IXEG's decision to leave it off for now - no need for them to fudge it and end up with a silly flappy bird flopping around the skies.
As a "sales guy" I'm certain you have had days where "that customer" comes in. Pissed off and angry right from the word go for no real reason except that they want to complain.
You sir, are that person for me today.
As a "sales guy" the only reason you put up with that customers bullshit is because your boss will fire you if you tell them they're being an asshole.
One of the few benefits of working for myself is that I no longer have to put up with bullshit from assholes like you. I can call it as it is.
To make this aircraft perfect, there must be WINGFLEX. And dont tell me that aircraft is small. and it is not so importent.
To feel the plane , the wind it is very nice. You can leave everything like it is, but wingflex must be.
And it will be the masterpiece of IXEG.
-2