Jump to content


  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

69 Excellent

About cmbaviator

  • Rank
    Advanced Member

Recent Profile Visitors

2,791 profile views
  1. i've found the cultprit, it was the plugin xlua but i haven't had any script, so check the script folder of xlua and I found this : as you can see, the first time i installed the Zibo script in the wrong folder (lelft), the right one being the correct one that was causing all the other aircraft to be broken I will now delete all the videos thank you for your help
  2. i hoped to avoid an reinstallation from scratch. The thing is aldo that my A300 inibuilds is broken as well but only the ZIBO is working fine so its weird
  3. After installing and unistalling several time, my 733 v1.33 is broken, idea how to fix it ? can't modify the ZFW, keeps going back to the EOW, knob like heading can't be changed....... all seems to occured after installing the ZIBO mode but even after several uninstalls ands reinstalls, still the same issue (GIZMO stable version chosen each time) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oLxhlxu38Yk&feature=youtu.be&ab_channel=CMBelite-FR https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uiXEAW744b8&feature=youtu.be&ab_channel=CMBelite-FR
  4. what would you need to apply rudder trim if there is ,no engine or flight control failure ? i've watched hundred of videos if not more on the B737 and ihave yet see the PF used rudder trim after take off ?
  5. Now we're talking lmao. I don't quite understand how you can determine the area of pitching moment change in ground flare based on these figures, could elaborate for me please these were all kiss landing, almost all were <-100 on touch down !
  6. thanks for the input i'm using CI35, would you mind telling me what CI LH used back in the day for the 733 ?? L/D ? I've flying the A320 (fslabs) the last couples of years haha, the green dot will always been put above the Vls even if the calculated one initially was lower than VLs I think. this is what confirmed it for me. The image below shiws the PFD of the A321 at FL370 with a GW of 67t prior to TOD 67.0 is quite light for an A321 so having a GD speed close to 250 kts at 67tons is very odd but I was explained that because the VLS was so high
  7. agreed but does really the nose drop starting from 60 feets ? i was thinking more in the 30 feets area
  8. could also depends on speed management, for example if at 50ft the pilot is at Vapp- 2kt and a VS of -800/-900, he would need lots backpressure during flare comared to being at Vapp +5 kts and a V/S of -600 flare starts at 53:45, you can see that he gives little back pressure and still manage to make a kiss landing He generated a float with not that much back pressure
  9. would you mind sending me those video links ?
  10. I put the current GW when the screen was taken +- 0.2tons, what other parameters are needed ?
  11. i beg to differ, in XP10, the ground effect killing the V/S was a bit exagerated and the nose down (nose heavier) when entering ground effect was absent which is not realistic now at 50 feet, you really feel the nose dropping and the need to add more back pressure. XP10 might feelt better for you but it's a bit less realisticI think, maybe @Litjan can shed some light on the matter
  12. there is a bit of blood so be warned before watching
  13. Hi guys, thnaks for the update I did notice that the pitch attitude seems quite hight during cruise, was wondering if its normal or due maybe to "experimental FM" ? Also why is the GD speed below Vls ? Almost 5° in the screen below Both screen ZFWCG was 14.9 GW: 51.5 here is a bit less (around 3°) and seems a bit more realistic GW 48.5
  14. ground effect is there https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kd26dS4DgFA&t=105s
  • Create New...