Jump to content

Leaderboard

Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 02/03/2021 in all areas

  1. I'm guessing something might have got overwritten in the RXP config file. Make sure your RXP GTN is up to date as well. Attached is the configuration file which goes into the TorqueSim BN-2T Turbine Islander folder. RealityXP.GTN.ini
    1 point
  2. 1 point
  3. Thank you, Jan! I'm really surprised to meet such helpful people here!
    1 point
  4. Hi Valentiner, you are doing fine! It is my fault for not looking at your first post closely enough! The waypoint "MENBO" is your "FROM" waypoint - you have already passed it. The waypoint "NORET" is your "current to" waypoint and "KISIL" the "next" waypoint. The PROGRESS page is built like a standard ICAO position report that pilots had to make (and still do in some regions) where radar coverage does not exist. You would need to call ATC with a position report that would go like this: "Flight XYZ, position MENBO at 1558, estimating NORET 1602, KISIL next". Airline pilots also use this page to fill out the flightplan when they track fuel usage. So you can use it to check how much fuel you had at the last waypoint (FROM) that you passed. Because often you forget (or are too busy) to read off the fuel right as you pass the waypoint, so you can use the PROG page to check it. The fuel at MENBO should definitely be more than the fuel at your next waypoints, though - which is clearly a bug. Cheers, Jan
    1 point
  5. Fixed it, but had to look around. Do you think you could include a link to this guide in your manual to help poor souls like me down the road? https://support.torquesim.com/hc/en-us/articles/360057635513-Steps-to-resolve-plugins-not-loading-Error-Code-126-
    1 point
  6. I'm completely lost for words. So much time was spent coding this, and we're getting called "amateurs" for it. It's up there with "Your TBM is too realistic! Can you do something about making a choice between basic mode and realistic mode?" Yes, we've been accused of the TBM being too realistic. @TBMpilot I'm sorry our TBM is far too realistic, or, in your words, "amateurish" for you. Perhaps the "OTHER" TBM is more suited for your needs. No persistence. Basic systems. Get in and fly. But as @rjb4000 mentioned, the product page has full disclosure on what is in our TBM. And we always encourage our customers to read it, to make sure they make fully informed decisions before parting with their money.
    1 point
  7. At the end of the day it's a simulator; so it should simulate. If you leave something a certain way in a real aircraft then guess how it'll be the next time someone returns to the aircraft? It's doing what it should do -- and it's one of the features I like.
    1 point
  8. You’re asking why the simulation behaves as advertised?
    1 point
  9. Please, because when starting with cold engine in Polar conditions, I don't know a method to warm up the engine to avoid high oil pressure caused by the cold thick oil. Revving it while parked, does warm it up after 10-15 minutes though. but is that is RL practice I don't know.
    1 point
×
×
  • Create New...