Ben Russell Posted March 27, 2016 Report Posted March 27, 2016 (edited) Top Secret photo of the team hard at work beta testing our latest build; Edited March 27, 2016 by Ben Russell 15
aljaz41 Posted March 27, 2016 Report Posted March 27, 2016 Would have been much simpler But hey, kudos to you guys for your thorough testing, looking forward to trying it myself. 1
Yidahoo Posted March 27, 2016 Report Posted March 27, 2016 4 hours ago, Ben Russell said: Top Secret photo of the team hard at work beta testing our latest build; You said you were beta testing the FMC, but clearly its not included in V1. I smell rat a 1
Ben Russell Posted March 27, 2016 Report Posted March 27, 2016 (edited) Fir, Maple and Cedar are clearly present in the photo! Edited March 27, 2016 by Ben Russell 3
Litjan Posted March 27, 2016 Report Posted March 27, 2016 6 hours ago, Fabio Pittol said: Nice shoes, Jan! That´s how we are struttin´ it here in Germany! 2
poodster Posted March 27, 2016 Report Posted March 27, 2016 (edited) 9 hours ago, Fabio Pittol said: Nice shoes, Jan! What are thoooooooooooooooooooooooooose?! Edited March 27, 2016 by poodster 2
FSSteven Posted March 27, 2016 Report Posted March 27, 2016 If you are wondering why I am not at this picture, I made the picture .. 2
Phantom88 Posted March 28, 2016 Report Posted March 28, 2016 Will Someone Please tell the Pilot The Flight Attendant would like Her Shoes and Socks back 3
sizziano Posted March 30, 2016 Report Posted March 30, 2016 How about instead of asking when it will be released we take the time to study up on the 733? I can guarantee that this plane can be 100% bug free but these forums will still be flooded with people requiring helpnor complaining about one thing or another. I expect all of you impatient souls to be the perfect 733 pilots on release.
poodster Posted March 30, 2016 Report Posted March 30, 2016 18 minutes ago, sizziano said: How about instead of asking when it will be released we take the time to study up on the 733? I can guarantee that this plane can be 100% bug free but these forums will still be flooded with people requiring helpnor complaining about one thing or another. I expect all of you impatient souls to be the perfect 733 pilots on release. Nothing is 100 percent bug free.
sizziano Posted March 30, 2016 Report Posted March 30, 2016 Nothing is 100 percent bug free. What makes you think I believe otherwise?
reincarnate Posted March 30, 2016 Report Posted March 30, 2016 I´m totally fine with the Gizmo message appearing cause I don´t use VNAV at all
Celis Posted March 30, 2016 Report Posted March 30, 2016 Nice video and great job with the airports.. 1
cmbaviator Posted March 30, 2016 Report Posted March 30, 2016 Awesome video, is that outer marker altitude issue a FMC bug or a nav data bug? I'm eager to fly this baby in about 6 weeks ? CMB Sent from Tapatalk
poodster Posted March 30, 2016 Report Posted March 30, 2016 4 hours ago, sizziano said: What makes you think I believe otherwise? Because if you know about coding, nothing is 100% bug free.
tkyler Posted March 30, 2016 Author Report Posted March 30, 2016 56 minutes ago, cmbaviator said: Awesome video, is that outer marker altitude issue a FMC bug or a nav data bug? I don't like using the term "bug" in this case....it results from the NavData database where that WP has a altitude restriction of 3000, which is too high for its proximity to the threshold. If you miss this tidbit when inspecting the legs page and fly the descent, you'll be quite high and probably miss your landing. We've seen this on several airports and you just have to inspect the route "vertically" if you plan to use VNAV, apply some basic rules of thumb and then edit the route accordingly. -tkyler
KAPTEJNLN Posted March 30, 2016 Report Posted March 30, 2016 (edited) Looks nice.. About the incorrect data of OM26 show 3000 ft what nav database do you use ? I tested it by Navigraph data for Aerosoft airbus database that some other developers are using and the data seems to be there. I know you use NavDataPro.. But it is odd if the data is missing from the Lido data.. But also know depending on database some modifications might have been done depending the end add-on.. That´s also why we have so many data bases for FSX that contain the same data more or less as developers have filtered stuff away for a database for there plane, in order to work best by there add-on.. But can´t say in this case as I don´t know the database you use or the data that is provided in the files from NavDataPro for that database. I can only read the Navigraph data files as that´s what I got and it has another value of (1930ft) that is the same as the chart.. Edited March 30, 2016 by KAPTEJNLN
tkyler Posted March 30, 2016 Author Report Posted March 30, 2016 (edited) 7 minutes ago, KAPTEJNLN said: what nav database do you use ? NavDataPro / Level D (xml) ..and the offending data lines: <Name>OM26</Name> <Type>Normal</Type> <Latitude>51.872750</Latitude> <Longitude>11.540094</Longitude> <Speed></Speed> <Altitude>3000</Altitude> <AltitudeCons></AltitudeCons> <AltitudeRestriction>at</AltitudeRestriction> Edited March 30, 2016 by tkyler
Tom Stian Posted March 30, 2016 Report Posted March 30, 2016 (edited) You can solve that descent with full flaps, gear down and spoilers full Edited March 30, 2016 by Tom Stian 3
M4cD Posted March 30, 2016 Report Posted March 30, 2016 On the latest Navigraph I get 1450 ft FINAL,Q26,26,N,3 IF,FF26,51.885009,11.629639,CB,0.0,0.0,2,3000,0,0,0,0,2,0 CF,30DME,51.867339,11.500920,0,CB,0.0,0.0,255.0,4.9,2,1450,0,0,0,0,0,0 CF,CB,51.860384,11.450539,0,COD,0.0,1.1,255.0,1.9,1,828,0,0,0,0,3,0 FA,CB,51.860384,11.450539,0,MAG,0.0,0.0,255.0,2,2000,0,0,0,0,0,0 DF,MAG,51.994989,11.794306,2, ,0.0,0.0,1,4000,0,0,0,0,0,0 Lawrence
KAPTEJNLN Posted March 31, 2016 Report Posted March 31, 2016 7 hours ago, M4cD said: On the latest Navigraph I get 1450 ft FINAL,Q26,26,N,3 IF,FF26,51.885009,11.629639,CB,0.0,0.0,2,3000,0,0,0,0,2,0 CF,30DME,51.867339,11.500920,0,CB,0.0,0.0,255.0,4.9,2,1450,0,0,0,0,0,0 CF,CB,51.860384,11.450539,0,COD,0.0,1.1,255.0,1.9,1,828,0,0,0,0,3,0 FA,CB,51.860384,11.450539,0,MAG,0.0,0.0,255.0,2,2000,0,0,0,0,0,0 DF,MAG,51.994989,11.794306,2, ,0.0,0.0,1,4000,0,0,0,0,0,0 Lawrence Well you are looking at the data from the Airbus and a given procedure I can´t tell you right now as I don´t have all the charts for this airport. I can just tell that the numbers after Final identify what procedure and runway you got.. and is not the same I used or the developer as the point you got is 30DME (that´s the name it might use).. But anyway you are not allowed to show those parts of the codes anyway I guess..
Recommended Posts