Jump to content

IXEG 737 Progress Update - March 12th


tkyler

Recommended Posts

How about instead of asking when it will be released we take the time to study up on the 733? I can guarantee that this plane can be 100% bug free but these forums will still be flooded with people requiring helpnor complaining about one thing or another. I expect all of you impatient souls to be the perfect 733 pilots on release.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, sizziano said:

How about instead of asking when it will be released we take the time to study up on the 733? I can guarantee that this plane can be 100% bug free but these forums will still be flooded with people requiring helpnor complaining about one thing or another. I expect all of you impatient souls to be the perfect 733 pilots on release.

Nothing is 100 percent bug free. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

56 minutes ago, cmbaviator said:

Awesome video, is that outer marker altitude issue a FMC bug or a nav data bug?

 

I don't like using the term "bug" in this case....it results from the NavData database where that WP has a altitude restriction of 3000, which is too high for its proximity to the threshold.  If you miss this tidbit when inspecting the legs page and fly the descent, you'll be quite high and probably miss your landing.  We've seen this on several airports and you just have to inspect the route "vertically" if you plan to use VNAV, apply some basic rules of thumb and then edit the route accordingly.

-tkyler

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Looks nice.. About the incorrect data of OM26 show 3000 ft what nav database do you use ? I tested it by Navigraph data for Aerosoft airbus database that some other developers are using and the data seems to be there. I know you use NavDataPro.. But it is odd if the data is missing from the Lido data.. But also know depending on database some modifications might have been done depending the end add-on.. That´s also why we have so many data bases for FSX that contain the same data more or less as developers have filtered stuff away for a database for there plane, in order to work best by there add-on..

But can´t say in this case as I don´t know the database you use or the data that is provided in the files from NavDataPro for that database. I can only read the Navigraph data files as that´s what I got and it has another value of (1930ft) that is the same as the chart..

Edited by KAPTEJNLN
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

7 minutes ago, KAPTEJNLN said:

what nav database do you use ?

NavDataPro / Level D (xml)

..and the offending data lines:

<Name>OM26</Name>
        <Type>Normal</Type>
        <Latitude>51.872750</Latitude>
        <Longitude>11.540094</Longitude>
        <Speed></Speed>
        <Altitude>3000</Altitude>
        <AltitudeCons></AltitudeCons>
        <AltitudeRestriction>at</AltitudeRestriction>

 

Edited by tkyler
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On the latest Navigraph I get  1450 ft

FINAL,Q26,26,N,3
IF,FF26,51.885009,11.629639,CB,0.0,0.0,2,3000,0,0,0,0,2,0
CF,30DME,51.867339,11.500920,0,CB,0.0,0.0,255.0,4.9,2,1450,0,0,0,0,0,0
CF,CB,51.860384,11.450539,0,COD,0.0,1.1,255.0,1.9,1,828,0,0,0,0,3,0
FA,CB,51.860384,11.450539,0,MAG,0.0,0.0,255.0,2,2000,0,0,0,0,0,0
DF,MAG,51.994989,11.794306,2, ,0.0,0.0,1,4000,0,0,0,0,0,0

 

Lawrence

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, M4cD said:

On the latest Navigraph I get  1450 ft

FINAL,Q26,26,N,3
IF,FF26,51.885009,11.629639,CB,0.0,0.0,2,3000,0,0,0,0,2,0
CF,30DME,51.867339,11.500920,0,CB,0.0,0.0,255.0,4.9,2,1450,0,0,0,0,0,0
CF,CB,51.860384,11.450539,0,COD,0.0,1.1,255.0,1.9,1,828,0,0,0,0,3,0
FA,CB,51.860384,11.450539,0,MAG,0.0,0.0,255.0,2,2000,0,0,0,0,0,0
DF,MAG,51.994989,11.794306,2, ,0.0,0.0,1,4000,0,0,0,0,0,0

 

Lawrence

Well you are looking at the data from the Airbus and a given procedure I can´t tell you right now as I don´t have all the charts for this airport. I can just tell that the numbers after Final identify what procedure and runway you got.. and is not the same I used or the developer as the point you got is 30DME (that´s the name it might use).. But anyway you are not allowed to show those parts of the codes anyway I guess..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...