Anonymous Human Posted March 11, 2015 Report Posted March 11, 2015 I am disappointed in X-Plane 10. Read my entire post before giving any premature reply like 'you should have tried the demo'.I did, and what I have observed in X-Plane and Laminar's trend in the recent past goes way beyond the deficiencies called X-Plane 10. It is a shame that as a long time X-Plane user I have to complain about something so basic as missing rivers and major inland bodies of water. X-Plane v9 had no such issues. X-Plane 10 is now a third of the way through its major version run and still lacks basic landscape features THAT WORKED FINE in version 9. I think Laminar truly needs to return to basics and get their act together on this. Paying $70.00 for software that is worse than the version before is plain unacceptable, unfair, and just dirty corporate. I just knew the minute they started making X-Plane into a mobile gaming thing that this is going to waste major time and given that they have finite resources the true desktop application is going to suffer. And suffer it has. Not just major bodies of water are missing, but landscape terrain itself has textures that don't make sense. For example, why are there green textures atop himalayan ranges that are brown in real life and ALSO IN X-PLANE 9? What's more, we are being told that DSF recuts won't be done for the entire version 10 run? They why did you release what clearly is beta quality software? Why not at least give us back the old tiles until you are done wasting time programming explosion like gaming effects into a what was and should remain simulation/modeling software? Clearly, the quality of X-Plane reached it's height in version 9. Why do we have to pay for your software and then we are encouraged to get into development behind it as well? Like being encouraged to correct and feed data into OSM. Please fix X-Plane desktop, stop wasting time on mobile platform and gaming, get back in touch with your roots, or risk being just another simulator that came and went. 1 8 Quote
ointment Posted March 11, 2015 Report Posted March 11, 2015 missing rivers and major inland bodies of water. X-Plane v9 had no such issues. Seriously? There are tons of missing rivers and bodies of water in Montana alone! Don't get me wrong….I love X-Plane V9.7, but I don't mind flying V10, either. If you've been a long-time X-Plane user, you should know it is a growing and alive piece of software. Nonetheless, if you really want your voice to be heard, I suggest you drop Austin a note at austin@x-plane.com Quote
SwissCyul Posted March 12, 2015 Report Posted March 12, 2015 My backyard pool is also missing... X Plane 10 is not a finished product yet, there is something that we call "updates" Quote
Ben Russell Posted March 12, 2015 Report Posted March 12, 2015 (edited) Think of all the updates, features and improvements we could have missed out on while Laminar did a poor job of duplicating the enormous data pools being collected by OSM and other collective mapping sources that Laminar is building on for the future. Clearly the programming talents of Laminar would be much better used if they were to be focused on surveying the world instead of writing tools to use the data that others can collect. So sad. Edited March 12, 2015 by Ben Russell Quote
Andyrooc Posted March 12, 2015 Report Posted March 12, 2015 The "waste of time" mobile app has sold over 500,000 copies at $5 a pop. You do the math. Quote
Leen de Jager Posted March 12, 2015 Report Posted March 12, 2015 This anonymous guy is placing this post both on Org as on COM. Then he should not be surprised to get the same reactions.. Once in a while there is a guy like anonymous human.He just joins this forum to make negative comments on our simulator and will (hopefully) disappear shortly. He is like the guy who joins my table in a restaurant whithout being asked and then starts telling me he hates the food I am having a good time with. Why is a guy like him doing such things ?Needs he a compensation for being neglected by his friends and family? Maybe there is a shrink in our community who can explain this (weird) kind of behaviour. Please doctor tell us where that behaviour comes from?Leen de Jager 3 1 Quote
Colin S Posted March 12, 2015 Report Posted March 12, 2015 1. HD Mesh V32. Updates3. The only thing I agree with is the gaming thing and only partially. That makes money for Laminar, and no company can function without money. If you don't like X-Plane 10, don't use it, keep flying XP9, your loss Hope that helps a little Quote
Ryan M. Posted March 12, 2015 Report Posted March 12, 2015 So wait, hold the phone. If you tried the demo and didn't like it, why did you purchase the full version? 3 Quote
Darius Alexander Posted March 13, 2015 Report Posted March 13, 2015 I think those missing bodies of water may be drought related. Quote
Colin S Posted March 13, 2015 Report Posted March 13, 2015 I think those missing bodies of water may be drought related. Climate change, man... it affects everything. I guess the amount of drought can be attributed to to ridiculous amount of fuel burned in the X-Plane world. Quote
SwissCyul Posted March 13, 2015 Report Posted March 13, 2015 Yeah, we should really lower our fuel consumption... From now on only the A350, A320neo, B787 and B777 are allowed to fly in the X Plane world so we can reduce carbon emissions 2 Quote
HarryCYUL Posted March 15, 2015 Report Posted March 15, 2015 I am disappointed in X-Plane 10. Read my entire post before giving any premature reply like 'you should have tried the demo'.I did, and what I have observed in X-Plane and Laminar's trend in the recent past goes way beyond the deficiencies called X-Plane 10. It is a shame that as a long time X-Plane user I have to complain about something so basic as missing rivers and major inland bodies of water. X-Plane v9 had no such issues. X-Plane 10 is now a third of the way through its major version run and still lacks basic landscape features THAT WORKED FINE in version 9. I think Laminar truly needs to return to basics and get their act together on this. Paying $70.00 for software that is worse than the version before is plain unacceptable, unfair, and just dirty corporate. I just knew the minute they started making X-Plane into a mobile gaming thing that this is going to waste major time and given that they have finite resources the true desktop application is going to suffer. And suffer it has. Not just major bodies of water are missing, but landscape terrain itself has textures that don't make sense. For example, why are there green textures atop himalayan ranges that are brown in real life and ALSO IN X-PLANE 9? What's more, we are being told that DSF recuts won't be done for the entire version 10 run? They why did you release what clearly is beta quality software? Why not at least give us back the old tiles until you are done wasting time programming explosion like gaming effects into a what was and should remain simulation/modeling software? Clearly, the quality of X-Plane reached it's height in version 9. Why do we have to pay for your software and then we are encouraged to get into development behind it as well? Like being encouraged to correct and feed data into OSM. Please fix X-Plane desktop, stop wasting time on mobile platform and gaming, get back in touch with your roots, or risk being just another simulator that came and went. post this on AVSIM, I dare you Quote
CaptCWGAllen Posted March 16, 2015 Report Posted March 16, 2015 (edited) I agree it's awful just look at these pics I took today - decided to throw the whole thing in the bin http://1drv.ms/19skJpGcheersPeter Edited March 16, 2015 by CaptCWGAllen 2 Quote
HarryCYUL Posted March 17, 2015 Report Posted March 17, 2015 I agree it's awful just look at these pics I took today - decided to throw the whole thing in the bin http://1drv.ms/19skJpGcheersPeter Quote
ointment Posted March 17, 2015 Report Posted March 17, 2015 I agree it's awful just look at these pics I took today - decided to throw the whole thing in the bin Disgusting! Absolute junk, really. How can you stand those visuals? Quote
sparkie66 Posted April 7, 2015 Report Posted April 7, 2015 I agree it's awful just look at these pics I took today - decided to throw the whole thing in the bin http://1drv.ms/19skJpGcheersPeter Awful, not even the chemtrails are modeled. Quote
Tim0654 Posted October 8, 2015 Report Posted October 8, 2015 there are missing scenery files too try flying around paris france and why are there no airport with structures (there were in the demo) seems like a bit of fraud here) about the only good thing about explane is the ground scenery ATC is not good keep hering the same thing over and over and try flying over the california desert what are all those big green circles anyway. think I will stick with fsx for now it better in most respects. 1 Quote
Goran_M Posted October 8, 2015 Report Posted October 8, 2015 there are missing scenery files too try flying around paris france and why are there no airport with structures (there were in the demo) seems like a bit of fraud here) about the only good thing about explane is the ground scenery ATC is not good keep hering the same thing over and over and try flying over the california desert what are all those big green circles anyway. think I will stick with fsx for now it better in most respects.Helluva first post! Quote
eaglewing7 Posted October 8, 2015 Report Posted October 8, 2015 Big green circles - those would be irrigation circles. A round field, with an irrigation system that rotates around a pivot at the centre of the field. Completely realistic, and used all around the world. At least be somewhat knowledgeable before you spout off about inaccuracies. Quote
Tim0654 Posted October 8, 2015 Report Posted October 8, 2015 funny I grew up in California and never seen that before lol spent a lot of time in the desert too. Quote
JGregory Posted October 9, 2015 Report Posted October 9, 2015 (edited) funny I grew up in California and never seen that before lol spent a lot of time in the desert too. Perhaps you didn't look hard enough? ... Satellite image of Northern California Edited October 9, 2015 by JGregory 1 Quote
Tim0654 Posted October 9, 2015 Report Posted October 9, 2015 (edited) sorry I should have mentioned I live in southern California and there are a few. but not that many. Edited October 9, 2015 by Tim0654 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.