Wingflex

[stringden]

Do we have wingflex, I cant see it. This is very important for realistic  atmosphere .

Edited January 5, 2017 by Morten

[Tom Stian]

Hello

Its no winglex

Check out this post.

 

[HerrSchwarz]

10 minutes ago, stringden said:

Do we have wingflex, I cant see it. This is very important for realistic  atmosphere .

We have A LOT of other problems, sir. I think things like that can wait!

Have a nice weekend everyone. :-)

[frumpy]

Looking out of the passenger window and watching that wing flex is my favorite thing to do with the IXEG

[Tom Stian]

2 hours ago, stringden said:

Do we have wingflex, I cant see it. This is very important for realistic  atmosphere .

The reason for IXEG to not prioritize this is that the real b737-300 do not have much wingflex. The wings are pretty stiff. ^^

[leinsters]

This is not an NG. Wing flex is minimal.

[apilot53@aol.com]

Its minimal, but definitely noticeable.  I would like to see it one day, but I agree there are many more important things that need to be finished.

[Torbinator]

When IXEG decides to employ a wing flex model, I'd highly recommend they buy a FlyJSim 732 and take note on how they did theirs.  From what I understand, Jack used the X-Plane wing flex capabilities to create it.  It came out really nice.

I respect IXEG's decision to leave it off for now - no need for them to fudge it and end up with a silly flappy bird flopping around the skies.

[cmbaviator]

maybe they can add a slider like in the FF767, so that Wing flew enthusiastic can set it to max even if it's not realistic

[cmbaviator]

well as IXEG wants to make realistic stuff, they want to implement realistic wind flex but is very complex as it's based on aero-elasticity.

 

 

[sizziano]

maybe they can add a slider like in the FF767, so that Wing flew enthusiastic can set it to max even if it's not realistic [emoji4]

I really dislike the 767 wingflex precisely because of this. Set it high enough and watch how the wing droops on the ground. FJS still has the best wingflex by far even 4 years after the release of the 727.

[Rodeo]

At least the 767 wingflex is adjustable and can be turned off…

[maumauthompson]

On 5/13/2016 at 6:26 AM, frumpy said:

Looking out of the passenger window and watching that wing flex is my favorite thing to do with the IXEG

I disagree.  I fly on the 737-300 regularly for work.

 

[stringden]

To make this aircraft perfect, there must be WINGFLEX. And dont tell me that aircraft is small. and it is not so importent.

To feel the plane , the wind it is very nice. You can leave everything like it is, but wingflex must be.

And it will be the masterpiece of IXEG.

 -2

[Morten]

It is not on the top of the to-do list at the moment.  As we see it there are more important thing to do first. Doing it right is also quite tricky, most of the attempts you see around are a simplification of physics and 3D bending moments.  Also, what you believe is a "must" is not necessary a "must" to others.

Edited October 30, 2016 by Morten

[JohnMAXX]

Strongly disagree.....

[donoscar]

On 10/30/2016 at 4:22 PM, stringden said:

To make this aircraft perfect, there must be WINGFLEX. And dont tell me that aircraft is small. and it is not so importent.

To feel the plane , the wind it is very nice. You can leave everything like it is, but wingflex must be.

And it will be the masterpiece of IXEG.

 -2

yeah and I want my desk, chair and office walls to vibrate with it and all that good stuff too

Edited October 31, 2016 by donoscar
forgot to add with 45+fps of course

[sparkie66]

Why dont you wingflex guys go do some more manual raw data departures and approaches. I bet you wont miss the lack of wingflex

lol

Edited November 1, 2016 by sparkie66
lol

[TheFriedchicken]

2 hours ago, sparkie66 said:

Why dont you wingflex guys go do some more manual raw data departures and approaches. I bet you wont miss the lack of wingflex

Well said, I'm more interested in flying this beauty on those wonderful approaches. I'm not one for automatic approach and landing (weather permitting)

This aircraft flys so well, stuff the wingflex it's not important at this point.

[stringden]

It seems to me , that you all guys have interest in defending you friends developers. We can eat without spoons and knifes too, but I dont think you do this, like we can fly without wingflex.

But nowdays it is important to have wingflex. If you dont want it go to Xplane 5 and fly on windows 95.

I wonder , why you write something here and make developers never even think about wingflex.

Shame on you !

[donoscar]

do you know the difference between a nice-to... and a Must-have?

shame on you not having understood what you have in your hands, nobody defends a developer, on my side at least I give my advice to let devs know not everybody is keen on fps killing animations. The interest we have is to keep this add-on free of useless rubbish that would impact its performance. This add-on, unlike others, that cannot cope with systems qualities, does not need any nice to have eye candy animations to be what it claims to be: the best simulated 737 out there!!! it is a master piece as such and no distraction is needed. as many stated, if you would try to master what is in this X-Plane jewel, you wouldn't even have the time to go outside of the cabin to watch "flex", on my side I would not even miss any objects outside of the cockpit... too much to do in the cockpit, but that is just assuming you actually fly this thing and are not touching yourself watching the plane land by itself in Autoland mode.

and if you still miss those, I would recommend you take on some other sim/ad-on combination to satisfy your very personal need for aviation-pornography! Have a look at JAR, they do some very nice ones, or the classic FSX/Aerosoft-cartoon-plane-on-the-rails-simulators. But please guys, stop the rubbish about wingflex. There are more important things to fix.

Edited November 2, 2016 by donoscar

[achutchison]

Seriously stringden, just fly the airplane. I suggest you watch this video: There is a lot to master in any complex aircraft like this one. Stop worrying about being a passenger and actually fly the damn thing!

 

[Yidahoo]

1 hour ago, stringden said:

It seems to me , that you all guys have interest in defending you friends developers. We can eat without spoons and knifes too, but I dont think you do this, like we can fly without wingflex.

But nowdays it is important to have wingflex. If you dont want it go to Xplane 5 and fly on windows 95.

I wonder , why you write something here and make developers never even think about wingflex.

Shame on you !

Wow five posts and -15 reputation. You really should take the hint. Now I am off to fly the IXEG, from the pilots seat, where I cannot see nor even care if the wings are flexing because its much more fun flying the thing.

[stringden]

Я рад за тебя. Молодец.

[stringden]

The world goes crazy. May be later somebody help me in my wish to have an exelent aircraft with biautiful WINGFLEX. You guys can futher play even with 2d panel.