Cameron
-
Posts
9,816 -
Joined
-
Days Won
414
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Latest X-Plane & Community News
Events
Downloads
Store
Everything posted by Cameron
-
A menu item on the aircraft allows you to show the winglets as you please.
-
Not initially, and I'm not sure if ever. Quite unrealistic in the end, but we'll wait for customer feedback after release. No. This product is much too customized for this.
-
Hi Stevie, No, not at this time.
-
A lot! As expected, the buzz around this product is very high and has contributed to a significant traffic increase after moving the official forums here. Yes, it will.
-
The entire team is working very hard each day to complete this product. A release time will be announced when we find it appropriate to do so and we're confident in our timeline.
-
Yes, that would be wind.
-
This is getting a bit ahead, but I can answer anyhow: 1. We don't believe in selling liveries. This is, in my opinion, deceptive and unfair to the customer. 2. A paintkit will be provided.
- 21 replies
-
- 14
-
-
RAMZEZZ Boeing 777 Worldliner not compatible with X-plane 10.4+
Cameron replied to vtremsin10's topic in Help!?!
Burz96, Come back here when you've grown up and are a little more mature. Your true young childish age is shining at the moment. This was never part of the discussion, and you'll find it very hard to find our products available for piracy anywhere. I'm sure people would pirate if they could, just like the guy here with an org product. Two weeks is extraordinary. 3 days is more like it. What's really more absurd is your sense, ability, and failure to backup your own software. -
Right, so you can't run Gizmo.
-
Gizmo does not work in anything but 64 bit.
-
You can expect the price to be fair for the half decade of work that has gone into this product split amongst the team. We'll announce that at a later date.
-
IXEG.net
-
You're back! Got that video yet? You're busy talking about ultra realism, all the while you previously showed me a 767 wing to model after. I've got the 3d modeler open just itching to put this in for you! I need your 737-300 video from seat 14D stat!
-
My point exactly. For that video alone they even had to zoom just to show it! Anyways, thanks for actually posting a video rather than going on about nonsense. I'm sure the team as a whole will do as Jan said and asess the necessity of this after release.
-
We missed you, Dondel. Thank God you're back.
-
You're not really helping the case here. I've asked you to help out. Jan, whom you are referring to, also agreed with my followup post on lack of wing flex. A wing will naturally have some sort of flex. That flex is POINTLESS to model if it can essentially not be easily seen. So, again, I ask you to please find us a video of a 737-300 showing the amount of wing flex you're looking to have modeled. I couldn't find any on YouTube. Plenty of 737-300 wing videos out there, just none with flex, even in turbulence, so I'm asking you to now help out in understanding what you feel is worth modeling from a real video of the real aircraft which you find.
-
You're making no sense. You just showed me a video of a 767-300, and a 737 NG, both of which have much larger wings. This is not a 737-300 you have shown me. Therefore, what you have shown me is also not a realistic representation. I suggest you read what you search rather than tell me I should search. I've been a part of this discussion from the get-go.
-
Hey there, If you don't mind, please find us some video of a 737 Classic flexing its wings in the way you wish it to. Seems some of you are having a hard time understanding this aircraft has such minimal to nil wing flex that I'd like your proof of what it should look like instead.
-
Hello Captains, I know a lot of you enjoy seeing some form of progress, so I'm providing you with a few screenshots showing off the exterior of the 737 Classic. As per usual, everything is a work in progress, but I hope you enjoy! Remember to click on the images to see a slightly larger version!
- 101 replies
-
- 27
-
-
IXEG appearances are scheduled as follows: January 8th - Frankfurt - FKK World January 12th - Daytona Beach, FL - Bob Evans January 20th - Schieferhof, Germany - Bernds Sauna Club January 27th - Carson City, Nevada - The Bunny Ranch (Jan is unable to attend this appearance due to family obligations) June 11th - Hartford, Connecticut - FlightSimCon 2016
-
Indeed, those are SkyMaxx Pro clouds. People may misinterpret your title and video to think those clouds are produced by Ultra Weather XP. They are not.
- 3 replies
-
- 1
-
-
- Ultra Weather XP
- Almuntassir
- (and 6 more)
-
It's a starting point suggestion. A lot of people seem to fail to understand that SkyMaxx Pro 3 has less a memory footprint than version 2. Where they get stuck is when they don't realize v3 sliders produce MORE clouds/detail than said slider position in v2. In other words, with SMP 3, less is more when compared to v2. But you are complaining. You started with "we all should not have to..." But this is not FSX/P3D. So what?
-
That's the way it works. Plenty of topics about how and why throughout the forums!
-
Please consult my prior reply with regards to your concerns at this stage.
-
Your obsession over a stick is starting to concern me.
