Leaderboard

I suppose I should demonstrate some form of life. I'll have to get with Jan on that as our radar (best I recall) had most of the features of the real thing. As far as "coming out soon", here's what I'll say....and this is overdue for sure....and I'm not going to convince anyone to believe me or not on the timing. It will get looked at and updated at some point. As sure as this is my 20th year actively involved in X-Plane work, it will continue to be so. A year and a half ago, things changed for me when Laminar announced its new store initiative in Montreal. I took a job with Laminar to completely rewrite its developer documentation. This was a "look to the future" for both myself and X-Plane, at the cost of 'now'. Laminar are looking to embrace a future generation of developers and we need to have better learning materials to engage this generation to develop for X-Plane, so I'm that guy....thats for Laminar. For myself, I needed more stability and a cushion, as the add-on market for X-Plane is still too thin to have any kind of long term security. Taking on this work with Laminar has allowed me to close out all other obligations and stay in the X-Plane ecosystem for the foreseeable future. The 'problem' for my customers and X-Aviation thus far, is that the initial phase or work to revamp and deploy the documentation was/is huge. New developer web site, new manual formats, a new, interactive PlaneMaker manual, lots and lots of rewriting, new illustrations...etc....and that has taken a good while to develop and received all my focus to get to what we call the "initial deployment" of the docs out the door. That initial deploy is not terribly far off. After the initial deployment, I will settle into a more regular time schedule that will afford me the time to get back to my own work. It has been my effort over the last year to try and achieve a point where I can only work on X-Plane endeavors between now and my retirment......and there have been personal hurdles along the way that are neither anyone's concern or business, but real to me just the same. It is my intention to crack open the MU2 and 737 again in early October, to resume work on my 'X-Aviation' things. I have discussed this with X-Aviation also. Between now and then I am focused on getting an initial deployment of the new docs out the door for Laminar. We will look at the IXEG radar early on for sure. I want to remain developing for X-Plane fully and it is my firm belief that this path i've taken was the required path to do so, and I apologize for the silence and delays. -tkyler

Edited to add: disregard the question below, but I'll leave this in case it helps others. After creating a Combination 2 and quitting and restarting X-Plane, Combination 2 is now an option for a keyboard shortcut target. ----- Great add on! Is it possible to set a keyboard shortcut to any combinations other than CL650:panel_combination:Combination 1? I can add multiple combinations to access via the Challenger 650 -> Panel Combinations menu, but only Combination 1 shows up as a keyboard shortcut option. Thanks!

Would be wonderful to know if the team is working on the new 12.3 weather radar implementation for the 737. Will definitely look forward to it!

I am glad to hear that you got it working! And thanks for reporting back.

In flight it should work! Let me know if it does not for you, we will troubleshoot together then.

Thanks for the clarification.

Thank you, I'm trying exactly this way I assigned the button to "Speedbrakes toggle between arm/disarm". But it was to no avail. This screenshot was taken on the ground as an example. But the problem also manifested itself in flight. We'll try the recommended one on our next flight.

Might jump in, but i think most dont realize this was almost lost, but thanks to @Litjan with a far smaller team, its being kept going. I do understand the FMS is requiring a whole rework to use XPLANE nav data saves an extra down load with a few bug fixes, but also sound bein redone to FMOD as the current sound engine causes some users issues. I believe Litjan was also temporarily helping Laminar, so there you have it, just takes a little research. Thanks cant wait

Yepp, I watched your video and it went well flying that this way

You can Google for "wmm 2025."

No. It's just a software bug. A fix has been delivered to TorqueSim by the developer, and is awaiting release.

This is due to a simulator bug in 12.3, there is no known workaround. We are all waiting patiently for a fix to be released by Laminar Research. Sorry for the inconvenience.

and another, Landing at KLAS.

Thanks for your professional insight; I will follow your recommendations. My best guess is that the c/g has been too far forward

Apologies, you're spot on - I'm not sure how I missed that! It does indeed look like I have a sticky rudder sometimes, thanks!

You are a lifesaver. Thank you so much

Quick update here. The glide path shows up on the using the G500 upgrade, so that's great. Would be a good addition to the normal CDI to be able to use the same.

Now that the final version of XP12 has been released, is there any timeline for the CL650 weather radar to be implemented?

If you hear nothing from us, assume that the project is not abandoned but no work has been done on it that would warrant us sharing any progress info. If we abandon the project, we will announce this here - so if we don´t - you know it´s not abandoned.

Hi, @Cameron I’d like to clarify something. At no point was I disrespectful in my wording. Using terms like “abandoned” or “disregard” was not meant as a personal attack, but rather as an honest reflection of how the situation looks and feels from a paying customer’s perspective. I believe constructive discussion includes not only praise, but also criticism...sometimes strong criticis, especially when issues remain unresolved for years. Expecting customers to tone down their language to a point where frustration cannot even be expressed seems unreasonable. I respect the work behind the scenes, but I also ask for the same respect in allowing honest, even if firm, feedback.

That’s all very nice to hear, but as paying customers, we’ve been listening to “behind the scenes stories” for years while the aircraft remains broken, outdated, and without proper updates. Promises, secret details, or “trust me, it’s being worked on” don’t change the reality: the IXEG 733 has been in the same state since its rushed XP12 release, leaving customers with a paid product that feels abandoned. Transparency and real communication through official channels would speak louder than any private conversation.

It's not dead at all!. Before I say this, a bit of disclosure. I AM NOT involved with IXEG, and I will not discuss or mention details/plans I will let official channels do so. I met Tom at FSExpo this past year in PVD and had a good hour long discussion with him about (mostly) the 737 we all love. NO IT'S NOT DEAD. He discussed details with me that if he wishes to share one day he can, but it's not my story to tell. But it's a VERY interesting story at that!. You folks would not believe the dark side of developing that happens. Like many of you, I too have been frustrated with the 737, but after talking to Tom at Expo, I can say I heard it from the horses mouth, THE 737 IS STILL BEING WORKED ON!!! Again I won't discuss what Tom discussed with me about what's being worked on. ALso @tkyler I would like to thank you again for you time at expo, was an absolute pleasure meeting and talking!

This is not the case. Forums also do not report when someone last visited if they elect to keep their browsing private in user settings. I've seen this from you a few times now, so please stop spreading misinformation on the status of a developers' presence. Tom is around (and working) as normal. We are in contact each and every day.

Sorry I didn't see this thread until now, but when the TDS was first released for XP I made this plugin that tricks the MU-2 into thinking RXP is present and loads the TDS. Fake RXP.zip

I’m a bit confused by your post, as the timeline doesn’t quite align. At the time of your purchase, there was no talk of an upgrade for a version of the simulator that didn’t yet exist, as we developers were not aware of X-Plane 12 at that point either. You purchased it two years before we ever mentioned a free upgrade to new purchasers. It is not possible for you to have "bought this aircraft because it included an upgrade to XP12." We'll post news when we're ready. I believe we're getting to a point of sooner than later.