Pils

D-ATIS only works offline for airports in USA that provide it in real life. Or when on Vatsim if a controller is online with the appropriate station name. There’s not universal source for this information online. As an alternative use Terminal Wx for METAR.

I don’t believe that’s possible, no.

We hope to have full support in the next release.

Then sorry I’m out of ideas.

You should disable Zink.

The log also said the prop collided with something, if that’s unexpected, sometimes X-Plane gives bad terrain data that triggers this, nothing much can be done about that. 2023-04-14 14:12:37 TBM900[crash.c:455]: collision detected in zone prop_strike_ctr (flex: 0.01)

Does your airframe have accelerated wear enabled? Are X-Plane’s random failures disabled?

Try either of these things: 1. Rename Aircraft/X-Aviation/CL650/liveries/PP-COA so that the directory is not 6 characters in length 2. Disable shared cockpit

Do you have the default scenery installed for that area?

Are you on a Mac?

Create a new airframe via the airframe manager, it comes fully “secured”.

Post your Log.txt, and read this: https://support.torquesim.com/hc/en-us/articles/360057635513-Steps-to-resolve-plugins-not-loading-Error-Code-126-

Shocked. (Not shocked.)

It’s all in this thread…

I'm with Ben on this one, tbh.

Multiple people have watched these videos and none of it makes sense. We are going to have to "go nuclear". You'll need to try removing all third party plugins except Gizmo64.plugin, and also unplug all additional hardware except basic controls for roll/pitch (because no-one wants to use mouse yoke!). We can also offer access to the V1.8 beta to see if it's reproducible there, if you'd consider joining the Hot Start Discord server. Please let me know. Thanks.

Sorry for being curt, not my intention to express anger. What I meant was we have discussed this with the Hot Start developer, they are very aware of this issue, and I'm almost 100% certain the CL-650 is using the XPLM SDK in a perfectly acceptable and normal fashion. I am no such confidence in DataRefTool; it is well known to use "hacks" to do its job (I agree, the result is very useful!).

You’d have to ask its author.

https://forums.x-pilot.com/forums/topic/22996-wow-even-without-a-proper-manual/?do=findComment&comment=181548

Please capture the value of this dataref over time during one of these “upsets”.

Personally I think not allowing any wiggle room is poor software design myself.

https://discord.com/channels/397379810067742721/397408003348889600/983476367909871676