Leaderboard

Dang, I am convinced now! And I also see that we must reasses our bugfixing and feature priority. As of right now, FMS, VNAV and cabin 3d are on hold until we get this most pressing omission squared away... Tom, please delete that VNAV overhaul and get cranking on the winglets! . Honestly... real classics don't have winglets.... Cheers, Jan

I've flown it with different FOVs/angles for months now, and have walked around real -300s for SWA in maintenance hangars (not saying this in a bragging way just giving experience). The Winglets aren't correct, and that's just it. Look at all the angles you wish, but I've yet to see it correctly mimick the real object. I know very well that it likely will cause liveries issues (but remember, a pretty decent about of liveries either only have blank winglets, no winglets, or just one solid colour). For the third time, I'm not here to bash, or hate on IXEG and their marvelous product, but this is something thay has bothered me, and everyone else whom I fly with notices it. I respect the work the IXEG team has done, and truly believe it's a good aircraft. If you choose not to (which I'm assuming you likely won't), while I will be most certainly disappointed, I'll continue to be a customer and use it. Regardless, given from experience, looking through hundreds of views, I strongly believe they are incorrect and should at least be revised or looked at sometime in the future (once many other issues are resolved)

Don't forget the angle, viewpoint and view mode, zoom and field of view all play a role on how they appear in XP, so your "documentation" is weak. You need to check these things in Blender, measurements, angles etc. Also, don't forget some 400 (!!!) liveries probably will need an update if they get modified and will look ugly until/if they will get updated.

Erie International Airport Tom Ridge Field is a public airport five miles (8 km) southwest of Erie, in Erie County. Airline service at Erie faces stiff competition from the Pittsburgh, Cleveland and Buffalo airports, all within two hours of Erie by car. In 2004 Erie was the third fastest growing airport in the United States, and the fastest growing airport in Pennsylvania.[2] It is also 128 miles (206 km) from Pittsburgh, 111 miles (179 km) from the Canada–US border, 95 miles (153 km) from Cleveland, Ohio and 105 miles (169 km) from Buffalo, New York. Coming sometime in the not so distant future.

Been flying the 737 since it was first released and only with this latest version have I noticed the stutters. They seem to occur every second or so like a heartbeat, as describe in this topic. I have indeed tried to disable all AI aircraft but to no avail. I also need to test this again but I have a feeling perhaps the radar is the culprit. I did a flight last night and noticed that it was rather stutter free (though I was flying over water so not sure if this was due to reduced object overhead) at least until I realized I had forgotten to turn the radar on. Once I did the stutters started, and even after shutting the radar off they seemed to hang around. Again I need to test more but that's what I initially found.

I am the person who came up with this "idea". And I'm pretty sure I will not be getting "sacked" any time soon, but thanks for the suggestion. It's always amazing to find how some people think they know more about how something should be done than the actual developers of the product. There are many reasons for the path we chose. And I'm sure glad you were not part of the process. Despite thinking that you know "everything" there is about aircraft development for X-Plane, you are apparently blissfully unaware of the fact that Austin is still updating the engine model, more specifically the turboprop physics. We, on the other hand, are acutely aware of what is going on and will release our products at the exact right time based on all the factors involved, not just some uninformed customer's opinion. You have no clue what goes on behind the scenes with our development process, so stop posting garbage here as if you do There are some developers who have "rushed" their releases for XP11 just so they can say they did it. That's not how we operate, and nothing you say will change that. Go troll somewhere else.

Hi, your request is noted and I will add it to our list for the next update! Thanks for your hard work on this plugin! Cheers, Jan

Hi Chris, there are many unknowns. I showed only that a simple disconnecting of the internet cable does not lead to an x-plane crash. At least in my case. But I can't say what happens when xenviro is able to connect to the weather server and there goes sometimes wrong. Imagine the case when the server get's to many requests at once and cannot handle them. This is a very complicated thing. As Donald Rumsfeld said "the known unknowns". The whole thing is somewhat foggy . Cheers Tom

Wow! @Peter T. This looks phenomenal, and I really mean, payware standards. However, I am a systems guy. So with it being freeware, it can look beyond amazing (one of the best 3D-modeling I have seen actually) but most likely will lack in the systems department. Maybe I could be wrong however I think you should 'work' with someone such as Flight Factor to get the systems implemented and they could exchange there current (really bad) 3D-modeling to yours, while they implement the 'detailed' systems (Flight Factor's systems are not that great but ok...ish..). Good luck however! Ellis.