Jump to content

Leaderboard

Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 10/30/2016 in all areas

  1. It is not on the top of the to-do list at the moment. As we see it there are more important thing to do first. Doing it right is also quite tricky, most of the attempts you see around are a simplification of physics and 3D bending moments. Also, what you believe is a "must" is not necessary a "must" to others.
    2 points
  2. Strongly disagree.....
    1 point
  3. Updated to v1.0.2 Flight model updated by Xamir Updated for X-Plane 10.51 Fixed transparent textures in cockpit Fixed ADF sensitivity Fixed smoke position Fixed beta range light and behaviour Fixed ITT instrument Fixed TRQ instrument Fixed Isolation valve light Fixed Beta range light Fixed magnetic compass You can download from: http://x-plane.hu/L-410/ Enjoy!
    1 point
  4. Few updates lately as I'm very busy with the holdings management so lot of coding activity, here are two screenshot of actual work in progress: Actually I plan it to be a simple management, probably limited to no more than two, three holdings due the complexity of the system, but I’ll try to improve it in subsequent updates.
    1 point
  5. On my PC, the FPS cost of going from low to high rendering settings with SMP4 disabled is more than the cost of rendering multiple overcast layers to the horizon with SMP4. Showing a framerate under "common use" is showing the FPS impact of the rendering settings, aircraft, etc. much more than the FPS impact of SMP4. Everyone has different aircraft, scenery, settings, and hardware, so that really wouldn't be useful. What I'm offering is a baseline. I'm *not* saying "you will get 70 FPS with SMP4 under worst case weather conditions with SMP's settings maxed out." Just that it is achievable. Everyone's setup is different and it's impossible to make claims like that.
    1 point
  6. If you work for an airline that checks on you turning the landing lights on/off at FL100 via ACARS I would start looking for another employer . I will check the dataref and see whats going on . Jan
    1 point
  7. I find it annoying that someone with a $300 mic and a $300 headset wants free content.
    -1 points
  8. I do appreciate that side of the argument. When I was in my early 20's I visited a friend of mine who worked for a very large Australian print magazine. He made it very clear that whichever company sent in the most free stuff and payed for the most "business trips" and purchased the most advertising "got the best reviews". I've never really given a toss about what a review has to say about product after that. Common opinion matters. Reviewers do not. Sorry, that's the economic reality we live in.
    -1 points
  9. ...and yes, that comes with a very large slice of chicken and egg syndrome as a side dish.
    -1 points
  10. If you fly 4 days a week and draw this horrible stuff, then you need to see a specialist. Please, I don't give a flying fuck if you ban me, you know it very well. With your horrible work and pay for updates, you will just lose your last 12 kittens and puppies that "admire" your project.
    -1 points
  11. Do we have wingflex, I cant see it. This is very important for realistic atmosphere .
    -1 points
  12. To make this aircraft perfect, there must be WINGFLEX. And dont tell me that aircraft is small. and it is not so importent. To feel the plane , the wind it is very nice. You can leave everything like it is, but wingflex must be. And it will be the masterpiece of IXEG. -2
    -2 points
×
×
  • Create New...