Leaderboard

Single engine approach into Havana

We totally reworked this in v2 I think you will be extremely happy with the results.....

Right now we are focusing on the middle -> northern part of the country , which means the next airports should be LLSD (which is almost done) , LLHZ and LLHA (haifa ...) , and we already have the photoreal done for the northern part (not published yet) .

Hangar, Im sorry but you are out in the Kepler belt, I always suggest to opinionated individuals to go ahead and develop a flight simulator and run it the way it should be run..... I wont even bring myself to read this baseless dreck it does nothing to improve upon our hobby. Sorry

Working out some of the finer details I cannot give a timeframe but soon....

King Air C90 over France King Air C90 over France

I'm not dead... I've just not had wifi for the last month, i'm a counsellor at camp atm, so i will be very distant

Went up north today, and did BGKK to BGSF in AeroPedro's recent update to his free Twin Otter. Nothing but featureless glacier for most of the flight, but both the climb and the descent were scenic. I do miss the HD mesh and photo scenery at these latitudes, though...

They also sell Chevrolet: http://www.mercedesoccasiondequebec.com/occasion/Chevrolet.html

And for those on Macs? You're dismissing a large chunk of the X-Plane market in your solution here. Can I ask what products you have made to support your claims? Even if a company takes in their own support, they still have dedicated staff to tend to that matter. Speaking for X-Aviation, considering the premise is quality over quantity, I don't agree with your farming out assessment. In fact, it just happens to show how ill informed you are of how intricately tied the devs that work with us (and vice versa) are from the "ground breaking" to the finished product. The support forums exist for a very good reason. You can interact with the developers all day long, and if you even pay attention, you'll see people do just that... As someone who interacts with customers daily in this market, I can tell you first hand majority of people much rather use one channel and point of contact for support as they purchased their product. In the event our support staff cannot answer a question (which is really quite rare), the developer is brought into the support ticket.

Listen to Hangars experience. Clearly he knows what he is talking about. What he says is also backed up by the simple economic theory for the necessity of trust between two parties whilst making any kind of business venture or transaction. The problem is all the power is in the court of the store owners, therefore the customers are not likely trust them and the whole thing falls apart. The owner has control as the customer cannot get his money back and in the case of most products cannot even tell others of the problems he/she has with it because posts they make will be removed. I know the last point does not apply to x-pilot, but at many other sites it does. To gain the trust of customers you need to listen to them and act on what they say. I think this is what Hangar is trying to say. To run a good business you need to be customer conscious, that is a basic fact, for too long people in the x-plane world don't seem to think this is necessary as they are running a 'niche'. Time to take a leaf out of every successful business. Care about your customers and make them feel safe to try and buy things, then they will trust you more and buy more from you. This does not necessarily apply to x-aviation in such a big way, but it certainly does to some other stores, again not necessarily x-plane ones either.