Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

Re the LCD - there is a direct replacement for the CRT, only change is the actual screen tech itself, and the bezel has Thomas instead of Collins. Certified in pretty much every aircraft that used that Collins CRT back in the day. Its a retrofit, All saabs left the factory with CRTs. Dont think its the upgrade the others where hoping for..

Chase i reckon we could get it up to 5, pass the plate around and possibly scrape enough money together to buy an hour or two of his development time. Might not be enough to walk away with a B model :P

Edited by N1K
  • 4 weeks later...
Posted

Is there any fix for the bank angle issue? It's really hard to fly properly on AP when the plane only banks 12-15 degrees. Flying through all my vectors. 

Otherwise, love this plane. Once I stop overcorrecting it on approach!

 

Eddie

  • Like 1
Posted
5 minutes ago, haskell99 said:

Is there any fix for the bank angle issue? It's really hard to fly properly on AP when the plane only banks 12-15 degrees. Flying through all my vectors. 

Otherwise, love this plane. Once I stop overcorrecting it on approach!

 

Eddie

This has already been fixed and will be included in the 1.5.2 update.  And, before you ask, we do not have a definite release date for the update.

  • 2 months later...
Posted
20 hours ago, haskell99 said:

But MAY... I'm dying to pull her out of the hangar!:(

Anticipation is half the fun.  Just think how sweet it's going to feel when the 1.5.2 update drops in..................................... August.  :P

 

Tim

  • 1 year later...
Posted
On 1/27/2019 at 11:20 PM, Goran_M said:

V2.0 is a PBR, 3D mesh and code overhaul, and will be a paid upgrade.

Little fixes, like the bank angle, are getting done as part of the 1.5 run and will be free updates.

 

Nearly 2 years now, absolutely ridiculous!!!!

  • 1 month later...
Posted (edited)
On 10/12/2020 at 2:48 PM, Goran_M said:

Hell of an introduction for your very first post.  

You have one hell of an attitude for a developer, in fact, your entire crew that roams these forums with nothing useful to bring forth to it's customers is what defines your entire studio. If anyone considers to purchase a product from you guys, I hope they do a quick look through google and where people have asked questions, concerns or feedback, you have pushed it back onto your customers claiming it's harware related or pushed off your toxic attitude. The LES SAAB will NEVER come close to study level. Whoever did your sounds, good job, it actually resembles something simular to the real aircraft but anything else is an arcade and I'd rather fly the default 737 in FSX for realism over this, especially with your overall attitude on EVERY single thread where people come with feedback or ask a question. 

Edited by falcon3y
Posted
1 hour ago, falcon3y said:

The LES SAAB will NEVER come close to study level. Whoever did your sounds, good job, it actually resembles something simular to the real aircraft but anything else is an arcade and I'd rather fly the default 737 in FSX for realism over this

 

You should probably let the three Saab operators using this in their training program know! We certainly don't want real pilots studying something not study level! :o

Thank God you're so smart and they're so stupid. You can be the voice of reason! :rolleyes:

  • Like 1
Posted
21 hours ago, falcon3y said:

You have one hell of an attitude for a developer, in fact, your entire crew that roams these forums with nothing useful to bring forth to it's customers is what defines your entire studio. If anyone considers to purchase a product from you guys, I hope they do a quick look through google and where people have asked questions, concerns or feedback, you have pushed it back onto your customers claiming it's harware related or pushed off your toxic attitude. The LES SAAB will NEVER come close to study level. Whoever did your sounds, good job, it actually resembles something simular to the real aircraft but anything else is an arcade and I'd rather fly the default 737 in FSX for realism over this, especially with your overall attitude on EVERY single thread where people come with feedback or ask a question. 

k, thanks

Posted
On 11/20/2020 at 11:57 AM, falcon3y said:

You have one hell of an attitude for a developer, in fact, your entire crew that roams these forums with nothing useful to bring forth to it's customers is what defines your entire studio. If anyone considers to purchase a product from you guys, I hope they do a quick look through google and where people have asked questions, concerns or feedback, you have pushed it back onto your customers claiming it's harware related or pushed off your toxic attitude. The LES SAAB will NEVER come close to study level. Whoever did your sounds, good job, it actually resembles something simular to the real aircraft but anything else is an arcade and I'd rather fly the default 737 in FSX for realism over this, especially with your overall attitude on EVERY single thread where people come with feedback or ask a question. 

I've never had anything like his happen with the LES team or Cameron. In my opinion it's all how you engage with folks and how you mentally react to their written word. Personally I'm thankful for their continued efforts with the 340.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...