Jump to content

Litjan

IXEG
  • Posts

    5,610
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    404

Everything posted by Litjan

  1. Yeah, just watch the fuel gauges. There is pretty much what you would do in the real plane, too. Yes, you can look out the window and see if the fuel truck is connected, but there is no way to tell if it is pumping kerosene or if the guy is just sitting inside picking his nose... . Cheers, Jan
  2. I would suggest - just for testing - to temporarily remove these plugins and see if that helps: Jar Design Ground handling (had several reports of crashes related to this one) Fly with lua (check that you have the latest version) AutoGate (you have several error messages related to this plugin) Xenviro (check that you have the latest version) Let me know how it goes! Cheers, Jan
  3. I am not really sure what you are talking about. How do you know the landing gear lever wants to move? Is it really squirmy or making whiny sounds? Seriously, maybe you can clarify a bit or even better provide a short movie, I am sure we can find the solution! Cheers, Jan
  4. Yeah, I really brought the best of the water out in that picture... there definitely is room for improvement!
  5. I guess everything is subjective... the water looks totally fine to me. Sure, things can always be improved, but if that is your number one priority, you will be disappointed with XP updates for a long time . Cheers, Jan
  6. While the beta is a moving target and things may change, I think that we will not need adjustment of the flightmodel. Cheers, Jan
  7. The ground effect bug is fixed in 11.10. Contrails and water textures are not part of any near future updates. Jan
  8. Yeah, really have no idea what could have caused a big jump like that. Variation in airspeed/altitude could be explained by: Sudden shift in environmental conditions (pressure, wind) Icing/malfunction of pitotstatic tubes But this is the first report we got in that regard, so I can´t really say with certainty what happened. Let me know if you see it again, please! Cheers, Jan
  9. This is not up to us to say, as we don´t make XEnviro. Cheers, Jan
  10. The only thing that I could think of is that you are not running the hydraulics - they are required to steer the nosewheel. Other than that the steering should just work like in any other aircraft (try the default 737). Cheers, Jan
  11. Hmm - are you using real weather or a weather plugin?
  12. Hi Jürgen, I run a EVGA Geforce 970 with 4GB VRAM on an Acer S277HK monitor. I have a second monitor attached as well (Samsung SyncMaster 214T). I run X-Plane as a "Windowed simulator" and my second monitor is set to "unused". Cheers, Jan
  13. We don´t model failures as a feature. The few you can find now are remnant from our internal system-modeling tests that we decided to make available for everyone. So consider them a goodie, and the "missing ones" not really missing ;-) A few of the default X-Plane failures work as well. We plan to add more failures in the future - after completing the basic aircraft (FMS, 3D cabin, ...) Cheers, Jan
  14. I run on a 4K monitor - and the knobs work fine. I do run in windowed mode, fairly big, though. Cheers, Jan
  15. Thanks for the nice words! Happy flying! Jan
  16. They didn´t ask much for our old 737s (- engines and other reusable parts)... but shipping and handling was expensive, and my wife wouldn´t let me put it into our garden :-( Jan
  17. This is what the reain effects look like: Cheers, Jan
  18. I want one of those! Very nice!
  19. Hi Bob, that smacks like a problem with the Virtual Aviation MCP, then. I am not familiar with the device, so I can´t tell you about any problems or pitfalls with it. Maybe there is a dedicated support forum or you can open a new thread here that is aptly named (maybe in the cockpit builder/hardware subsection) - there are some more knowledgable people around that may have an answer on that. To make a video, you can use the built-in movie-maker in X-Plane, it saves the quicktime movie in \Output. But those movies grow quick in size... Cheers, Jan
  20. Hi, first time I have heard of that problem. We don´t really have any "bend arrows" in our cockpit - you manipulate the knobs by moving the cursor until it turns into a little hand, then click to "grab", then move the mouse while holding down the clicked button. There are some instances where the default-style "turn arrows" of the old 2D cockpit we used to have "bleed through" (I don´t know why), but they don´t have any function. Cheers, Jan
  21. Hi Bob, I would really have to see a short movie of that happening to let you know whats going on. I am almost certain that it is intentional (yet unexpected by you) behaviour - we have had thousands of people operate the aircraft for well over a year and this is the first time I heard anyone have that problem. There are several cases where the speedcursor will move seeminly "on its own" - what you describe sounds like its a "runaway" problem where you grab the cursor, and then loose view of it (the sim considers that as holding and not letting go) and then move the mouse wildly, maybe trying to manipulate something else - but really just moving the speed cursor "to the stops". Again, a video would say more than a 1000 words, any chance of capturing a short one for me? Cheers, Jan
  22. Hi Bob, your joystick is spikey and sends commands - so the AP "thinks" you want to override it manually and disconnects (as in the real aircraft). To cure this, increase your CWS Deadband setting in the preferences menu. Cheers, Jan
  23. Litjan

    Stall

    You cant sustain 1200 at that altitude - use FL CHG or manage your climbrate carefully. Jan
  24. Litjan

    Stall

    Here is a pic of my 737 climbing with ECON speed (Mach 0.73) at the same weight: My guess is that you failed to switch to MACH during the climb - eventually the IAS is equal to MMO (maximum MACH no.) and the plane will use all of its energy to "push" against the subsonic boundary and eventually stall due to MACH effects (airflow stalling). Maybe you also got too slow - this will also kill your climb rate. Jan
  25. Litjan

    Stall

    You had a grossweight of 55.6 tons - that is close to the maximum takeoff weight. The aircraft should be able to go to a maximum altitude of FL350 at that weight, so 340 should have been possible. It sounds like you didn´t manage your engines or airspeed during the climb correctly - we would need a bit more information (as Morten said) to find out why the plane stalled. Cheers, Jan
×
×
  • Create New...