Leaderboard

it looks like all the commands are there, every one I searched for from your 'missing list' shows up in XP, both in the keyboard screen and when assigning them to a button on hardware. I don't know how DRT searches for commands (and DRE doesn't display commands) so I can't speak to your DRT results. I 'officially' check for the existence of commands via X-Plane's 'keyboard' search function. If they show up in there, then they exist. If DRT doesn't pick them up, I couldn't say way. I don't use DRT myself.

Wow. Talk about a failure to comprehend what was said to you. There was no denial of updates in the future, or that the product is in need of them. You just chose to take it all in a whole other way than intended.

For those who missed it, major update Get it now. B2 only bug fixes B3 Mainly Zink Fixes XPD-15373 – F-14 external fuel tanks always revert to full load when opening the Weight, Balance and Fuel menu XPD-15378 – XPlane 12 hangs when querying ipv6 addresses due to change in kernel 6.9.0 XPD-15388 – Bug report “New writable datarefs are not writable” XPD-15410 – copy-paste error prevents accessing 430 flightplan in the 172 XPD-15415 – Bug report “Zink driver crashes with plugins” XPD-15416 – Bug report “Zink causes crash when opening plugin window (Linux)” XPD-15419 – XPLMGetFMSFlightPlanEntryInfo doesn’t perform XPLMNavRef lookup, while XPLMGetFMSEntryInfo does XPD-15421 – Toggling VR leaks memory XPD-15423 – Installer manifest broken if file compression scheme changes without SHA changing XPD-15429 – Regression: with bleed air = OFF, the cabin still slowly pressurizes XPD-15430 – Bug report “Zink CLI option not forcing Zink to be enabled” XPD-15434 – XPLMPopOutAvionics() crashes if called on a stock avionics device (GNS530 for example) XPD-15437 – XPLMGetAvionicsGeometry() incorrect when avionics is popped out XPD-15438 – XPLMSetAvionicsGeometryOS() has vertical switched

Four images and logfile attached. What gives? Is there a fix I've missed or is it a setting somewhere here? There are situations where this issue does not appear but I'm not sure of the finer details here. Blue skies and thanks in advance Log.txt

Hey I have noticed for a while that I am unable to set low visibility. Example would be ILS landing, low clouds at 200feet etc.. If I don't use Maxx and just use default xplane weather it looks fine, but when I install Maxx back in again clouds are not low enough.. Whatever I do I can't get them low enough or dense enough. Is this like that for everyone? It doesn't matter if I use ASXP or not still the same issue. I do use RWC as well. If anyone can post some advice or settings I should try that would be good. Other than that all looks great but I can't setup ILS low visibility approach. Thanks Krys

I think I have the same issue. Did a flight today and I could always see the ground, weather was overcast at 5000 and I was at 8 and could still see the ground. Switch to standard X-plane weather and by by ground. Seems like the clouds are always in front of you, you can't fly through them. Flying in VR.

Hello guys. I use Skymax pro 5 a,d I have very less FPS I have a good PC I9 770 RTX2070 32Gb ram. O don't use the volumetric cloud. Thanks for you help

Hello Frank, i also upgraded to Version 5 2 months ago and i have to say, that the frames with Skymaxx Pro and the Real Weather Connector are really unstable. I checked the CPU and Memory, when the frames starts to fall and the CPU is not running over 50% and the Memory not more than 35 %. I didn´t changed something on the system or in XP11 (same graphic settings,plugins and so on) . It´s the same before the upgrade. Especially when its overcast, the frames fall below 20 or 10 frames sometimes, even if i fly over the ocean. In version 4 everything was smooth. In the plugin Admin, i noticed that SMP takes 70% of the resources and i have nearly the same settings as Sim2heaven. Is it possible to improve the frames in near future? Kind regards Robert

I average 40 FPS in Xplane 11. If i enable Skymaxx my frames never go past 20 FPS and get as low as 6 FPS in cloud. Not happy with the product its not usable without ruining the whole flight experiace. I run it in a RTX 2080 TI