Leaderboard

The AS350 has really grown on me...

Wow!! Thanks for all the pictures! Been making some more doors lately!

Guys, We're not going to let this topic dwindle into a speculative thread of paid vs non-paid. I will say that I'm very proud of Frank and John for the efforts that have always been made since product release to address customer concerns, and with that, I firmly feel they have done their part to justify whichever type of release chosen. That said, we'll have more details about V2 soon, including whether it's paid or not. Please leave the debate out and focus on what's being presented to you in the thread from Frank for now.

Here's a much nicer screenshot one of our beta testers, Emma Bentley, took of SkyMaxx Pro 2.0 beta 8. We're still tweaking the appearance of the clouds for beta 9, but I think it's shaping up pretty nicely.

Agreed my friend

Will this be a free update?

Looking superb!!

SkyMaxx Pro 2's shadow settings are completely independent from X-Plane's built-in settings - it uses its own shadow system for clouds. There is a checkbox to enable them, and a slider to adjust their intensity, within the Skymaxx Pro configuration screen. So, you can adjust X-Plane's shadows however you wish and tweak the cloud shadows on their own.

You will kill me heart '*-* I want Skymaxx Pro 2 hahahaha!!!!

Aegean 737NG (x737 - fictional livery) ready for departure from Mykonos.

777-200 Modified XPJ 777

More DC-10 shots, this time in Alitalia livery It will be relased under Aerobridge Studios, before you ask if I do have permission-

#

Dassault Rafale over the Swiss Alps. Dassault Rafale over the Swiss Alps. Alphajet de la Patrouille de l'Air Française. Alphajet de la Patrouille de l'Air Française. Alphajet de la Patrouille de l'Air Française. Alphajet de la Patrouille de l'Air Française.

"Easier said than done." Combined that with the fact that we have only just been granted the ability to apply forces reliably to the flight model to actually affect flight performance with new features in the 10.30 beta and your statement is naive.