Jump to content

Leaderboard

Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation since 09/25/2025 in Posts

  1. Hi Manfred, sorry for the late reply, I was on duty yesterday flying EDDF-KEWR.. Yes, this would have been my first guess - if the hydraulics are off (or failed) we simulate the so called "manual reversion" - the plane can still be flown with raw muscle power using the cables, but the flightcontrols are not powered, so they are very hard to move, like a car with the servo steering failed. We simulate this by making the controls move SLOW - the real controls are just HARD to move, but we can not simulate that...it may be possible with a force-feedback joystick like you have one, but those are still the exception for simulator users. I have flown that failure in the simulator a few times, and it is acceptable to have one pilot work the yoke with both hands (and the other one controlling the throttle on his command), because it is pretty much impossible to control the plane that way with only one hand on the yoke. Glad to hear that you are enjoying the plane, all the best, Jan
    1 point
  2. Guys, you are quite critical and in my opinion, IXEG 737 deserves attention and respect. Yes, there have been no updates for quite some time, but the developer wrote the reason. The second point, they are working on the update, in particular, improving the work of the FMS, radar in accordance with the latest updates of Xplane 12, as well as other fixes. I am a scenery developer in the past for Prepar3D, now MSFS and I understand the reasons for the delay, especially not so long ago, the development team gave a full answer to their plans and the reasons for the delay. Each of the developers has their own life, problems, for example, I live in a country that has been under military attack and has been at war for the fourth year. If you don't want to spend your money on something, don't spend it, no one is forcing you to do it.
    1 point
  3. I respectfully disagree. The lack of any weather radar functionality in the CL650 had made me temporarily shelve the aircraft. Too many times I got torn up in some CBs because I couldn't see them at night. WXR is the feature that many of us have been eagerly waiting for. I want to fly her again in all weather conditions.
    1 point
  4. Oh wooow, this was time-limited?! This is really annoying.. They will not get 85 bucks from me for the XP12-Update.. RIP IXEG for me..
    1 point
  5. This isn't an XPilot forum but some people use 123.45 as a shared air-to-air frequency.
    1 point
  6. Hi Pils and thank you for your answer, I selected the wrong item on the button assignment. I choosed "toogle autothottle system" instead of the "TO-GA". Now, when I do my checklist, N1-TO appears on the ATS screen on the glare shield.
    1 point
  7. The FMS and VNAV are superb. One thing I noticed (and I do this in the real plane), if one flies an ILS or RNAV with intent to circle, I like to build the visual approach to the intended runway of landing in a secondary flight plan. I switch to HDG/ ALT to begin the circle, then activate the SEC flight plan (visual), go Direct to the RX fix, then select Nav/VNAV, dial the Alt selector to zero, (adjust with VVS is above vertical profile) then the jet flies a picture perfect visual approach (one can assign speeds to the visual fixes also to let ARS handle that). In Version 1.8, it will do this, BUT when activating it in this manner, VNAV does not work. The workaround is to build the Visual in the Active flight plan but don’t activate it until committed to circle- in this scenario it’s all there, VNAV and all. The benefit of doing it the first way is that the original approach then becomes Secondary and can be activated promptly in the event of needing the published Miss. On the request front, can we start with the Altimeter in Baro? I'm happy to answer real world CL650 questions or to beta test new versions. I have three copies on three machines- 2 Windows PCs and a M4 MacBook Pro. I fly S/N 5911- technically a 60( but with the PL21 Advanced, HUD and triple IRS/FMS.
    1 point
  8. Really? If any feature warranted deploying an update, this would be it.
    1 point
  9. Greetings, Do you have a timeline when this will be added to your creations......B737, CL650? Thanks.
    1 point
  10. I suppose I should demonstrate some form of life. I'll have to get with Jan on that as our radar (best I recall) had most of the features of the real thing. As far as "coming out soon", here's what I'll say....and this is overdue for sure....and I'm not going to convince anyone to believe me or not on the timing. It will get looked at and updated at some point. As sure as this is my 20th year actively involved in X-Plane work, it will continue to be so. A year and a half ago, things changed for me when Laminar announced its new store initiative in Montreal. I took a job with Laminar to completely rewrite its developer documentation. This was a "look to the future" for both myself and X-Plane, at the cost of 'now'. Laminar are looking to embrace a future generation of developers and we need to have better learning materials to engage this generation to develop for X-Plane, so I'm that guy....thats for Laminar. For myself, I needed more stability and a cushion, as the add-on market for X-Plane is still too thin to have any kind of long term security. Taking on this work with Laminar has allowed me to close out all other obligations and stay in the X-Plane ecosystem for the foreseeable future. The 'problem' for my customers and X-Aviation thus far, is that the initial phase or work to revamp and deploy the documentation was/is huge. New developer web site, new manual formats, a new, interactive PlaneMaker manual, lots and lots of rewriting, new illustrations...etc....and that has taken a good while to develop and received all my focus to get to what we call the "initial deployment" of the docs out the door. That initial deploy is not terribly far off. After the initial deployment, I will settle into a more regular time schedule that will afford me the time to get back to my own work. It has been my effort over the last year to try and achieve a point where I can only work on X-Plane endeavors between now and my retirment......and there have been personal hurdles along the way that are neither anyone's concern or business, but real to me just the same. It is my intention to crack open the MU2 and 737 again in early October, to resume work on my 'X-Aviation' things. I have discussed this with X-Aviation also. Between now and then I am focused on getting an initial deployment of the new docs out the door for Laminar. We will look at the IXEG radar early on for sure. I want to remain developing for X-Plane fully and it is my firm belief that this path i've taken was the required path to do so, and I apologize for the silence and delays. -tkyler
    1 point
  11. Yes, there are plans to do so.
    1 point
  12. The last update was a year ago: The next update is well into development and hopefully will be out in beta before end of the year.
    1 point
  13. No, you will not be able to do this on your own. To be clear, you should also not expect a weather radar to be available in X-Plane 11. This is going to be a feature for X-Plane 12 once available.
    1 point
  14. Yes - we're looking into adding it!
    1 point
  15. The CJ has fully custom switches for most anything. They can be found in the X-Plane command browser under the prefix afm -> cj -> cmd All are listed in commands.txt in the CJ's aircraft folder -> plugins/cj_systems/resources
    1 point
×
×
  • Create New...