Cameron

Turn your digits knob up?

It will surely work with Win 7.

This topic was about an X-Plane.org product. I don't care to comment on the rest of your post since it's a clear waste of energy.

Indeed, they did!

This is piracy. Sorry, but your justification of this sucks.

Chill guys. Easy change. QC is our final step in the test phase of 3D model for now. Systems first. Nitpick after release, because what you see now is not final until it's, well....final.

It's for X-Plane. It is not released yet.

It's more or less buffeting and does not come into play until necessary. TrackIR works great with it.

Built in!

The reality is there's no way to "properly" simulate the lag anyhow. As Jan has said, over time airlines will invest and do CPU upgrades, thus making said systems much faster in calculation and reaction. Therefore, there's no correct "time", and truth be told we're not still in the 80's. We are very much so in the year 2015, where some 733's have most certainly been upgraded and are still in service.

And it would.

It's in the original installer where you select what variants/liveries you want...

You're pushing high poly aircraft and clouds to hit a fillrate wall, so yes, seriously. Flight simulators are not mapped games like Fallout 4. You simply cannot expect the same type of performance, especially on a mobile chip.

You have a mobile graphics chip. You're expecting way too much for this video card, and bluntly, what you want is unrealistic. Get a desktop if you want true performance (and even then you won't be getting crazy high fps).

Surely you're not bored of the last couple of purchases you've made already in the last week, are you Chris?

I don't honestly have much time to start giving breakdowns of Navigraph files, nor does the team for the time being. The 737 has been 5 years in development. At some point in that process some stuff changed, and we've still got to go over the data to figure out if it's an accident on their part or not. If you are not having issues with your tool currently then I suppose you have nothing to worry about. This really isn't a thread for debugging other products!

I don't remember which of the two it was, but pretty sure it was LVL D. Out of curiosity, why do you want to think about it?

We'll discuss that at a later date if need be. The ultimate goal is to contact the usual sources of data and have them create a dataset based on the IXEG choices so you don't have to even think about it.

Please re-read the X-Aviation contact page when it comes to expected response times. This same information is in huge red text on successful contact submission. Sometimes reading text can do you good.

The 737NGs have larger wingspans. The two videos you posted are of an NG and a 767. The NG alone has roughly 22 feet of extra wing! Do realize that the larger the wingspan, the more flex. It wouldn't be so drastic on the -300.

We'll see if you still say that after seeing how things are currently implemented. Many will be pleasantly surprised!

It amazes me the people who fail to read big red text after submitting support tickets.

No it will not. It will be compatible with Steam though!

Nothing is off the table. This is one of those things we wait for community feedback on after initial release.

At a later date.