Cameron

Nice work, Guy!

The installer probably still installed a NEW file without the .off naming convention. In other words, you likely have two frame files now since the update!

Hi, All, I just wanted to pass on a note to our fellow CRJ developer Philipp and say Happy Birthday! Thanks for your hard work and continued contributions to the community, Philipp! Looking forward to many more in the years to come.

Hello, all, This will serve as a formal forum announcement that we have released the version 1.4.4 update for the Take Command! CRJ-200. All customers who have purchased the CRJ-200 up till now have been sent an e-mail by X-Aviation with complete installation instructions on how to update your product. We have made this a very simple process! For those that purchase the CRJ-200 from today forward, your purchased download will already be updated to version 1.4.4 for you. What if I didn't get the update e-mail? If you did not receive your update e-mail don't fret! X-Aviation has updated our system to allow all customers to update with ease, regardless of whether you received an e-mail for the update! Here's what to do: 1. Login to your X-Aviation account here: https://www.x-aviati...talog/login.php 2. View your past order history invoice that contains the CRJ-200 purchase on it. 3. At the bottom of the invoice you will find a blue highlighted link to your update that says: "Take Command!: CRJ-200". The new installer will detect whether this is a new install, or if you already have any CRJ-200 version installed. Depending on your current situation, the installer will run through the appropriate paths with you, including uninstalling all unnecessary items from the previous version! Your liveries/downloaded paints will be safe in this process! There are some important fixes and requests implemented in this update. The following is a list of additions/fixes included: [PFD] -Made flight director needles a hair brighter and thicker to enhance readability -Made side-slip indication work [MFD] -Added altitude prediction arc -Added wind indicator -Moved range indications to match the real ones -Corrected missing VOR/ILS ID indication when no DME signal was received -Fixed indication of non-existing next and final waypoints [FMS] -Improved the interaction of DME-Arc waypoints with the turn prediction -Improved wind correction in holding patterns to adjust for different down- and upwind turn radii -Fixed a bug that sometimes caused holdings to fail in areas with high magnetic variation, especially in strong wind -Fixed a bug in the Linux version that caused a crash with SIDs at some airports -Fixed a bug in the Windows version that caused the holding inbound course entry to be interpreted incorrectly -Display again the name of stored/loaded route in the CO ROUTE field -Several stability improvements to the HOLD and FPLN HOLD pages As always, thanks for being a customer with X-Aviation. We appreciate your feedback and support! Enjoy these latest updates, and stay tuned to the forum as we continually announce the latest happenings.

Ben is correct. The aircrafts change install location between the two stores. This should not be altered. My suggestion would be to make a copy of the CRJ folder and make a duplicate somewhere so your paths match. This will prevent you from having problems through updates.

There is not currently one available.

The A320 is currently on hold, but to answer your question it never was intended for MSFS.

Way too early to tell at this time. Step by step!

No, this will not be made for FS X.

The default C400 never got finished and was pulled. Whether it ever will remains to be seen, but I don't believe it's on the immediate radar any longer.

No, not at this time. We have looked at changing things, but for the moment the full spec is not released and in-house tools would need to be created to achieve this. Additionally, autogen looks rather awful (in our opinion) over imagery without proper placement. Considering a lot of our packages are state based this is not a small task. Over time we have come up with many tools to assist us by means of automation. We'll see where the future takes us...

Moved to the appropriate forum.

Absolutely!

It's quite likely that a GPU that old is in fact the source of the problem. The issue you describe goes along those lines.

Email.

Not a bug. It's done on purpose for Windows side. This is slated for a change soon. You bought both?

Amazing!

As this is now solved pending the next update, this thread is now closed.

Channel 9 is still in effect at the discretion of the captain for the flight. I don't believe all aircraft have been converted over to have this feature yet, but it is to stay for the moment.

I've been quiet and acted as an observer to this thread, but it's time to jump in. First off, I believe people can make a change. It is possible, especially with peer pressure to do what's right and we've seen it happen here in the past. Because of this, I've been relatively open-minded and hopeful Zroman would do what's appropriate though it's apparent his maturity level is just not there at this time. I'm sure in the future he'll look back (if he does) and realize his actions here were highly immature. Living and learning is what we do in life, after all. We've all had our moments and if any of us deny that we know deep down we're lying. All this said, majority of the people in this thread have a common theme going here. They do not respect Zroman for his past actions. Actions which have caused a damage to his reputation well beyond an easy task to repair. Converting aircraft from MSFS to XP is one thing. Doing it without permission or utilizing others' already copyrighted X-Plane work without permission is also a no-no. I have been fully aware of Zroman's previous actions, though as I believe people do generally "live and learn" we have allowed him a chance here. Initially I believe this started out okay. Yes, he got flack from several people here, but this comes with the territory of dealing with the bed you have made by previous negative actions. It is experiences like this that generally change a persons mindset to change to the point they want to earn peoples' trust back. Unfortunately, Zroman's just not capable of accepting why people are upset at this time. Instead, he further antagonizes the situation. The biggest testament to this aside from his previous posts here are in his profile interests: He's definitely attracted attention, but it's not positive in the least. Lies are the clearest indication that Zroman has no intention to change, and I'll point out a few quotes that are from postings here by Zroman to show you he has little intention of changing at this time: When only a few posts later he has tattled on himself (likely by mistake): And again: The most troubling side to this is these are admittedly default MSFS 3D meshes. The chance of Microsoft themselves ever condoning this is next to nil, and it further proves that Zroman has not taken initiative to make a change. He may have gotten permission for the 777 (as has been shown), but straight away he's going straight back to old antics. Ben has been relatively vocal in this thread as well. While I'm not as direct as Ben, I do respect him for sticking up to the justice of the situation. Ben is quite honest when he speaks, especially when it comes to things that go against copyrights, permissions, or contracts. As someone who has been burned before I believe it hits home easily to the point the tolerance level for such behavior is near non-existant. All in all after assessing the situation here, reading Zroman's posts and deciphering what is honest and what is not, I do agree with Ben and most of the others who have posted in this thread. Nicola, I believe you have the right mindset and I agree with you as well. Unfortunately, I think the mindset isn't "ready" for someone like Zroman. He's just not willing to be mature enough at this time to raise up above the masses and prove others wrong. My quotes above are the simplest form of proving this. His profile interests further solidify it. In reality, the 3D artwork Zroman has so far released is created by other people (MSFS developers, and the ACF files are created by X-Plane developers). Merging the two together takes a little bit of work, but it is not a crazy talent. To be honest with you, I thinks it's tougher to make an acf file from scratch than it is to do these types of conversions in the manner Zroman has. That's a personal opinion, of course and not meant to discount anything other than being straight up honest. Zroman, At this time with the mentality you have and the path you are headed, you will not even begin to compare or amount to what Ben has contributed to the community over the years. His contributions both in the form of knowledge and content are insurmountable. Because of the current situation, the common theme amongst members here, Zroman's apparent will to NOT make a positive change, and the continual web of lies we are electing to ban Zroman from the forums. Perhaps in a few years down the line Zroman will have gained some maturity and utilize his talent properly. If anyone has any concerns regarding this please don't hesitate to contact myself or an admin. This thread is now closed, as I feel enough people have had a chance to say their bit of opinion and the only place we'll further go is circles. All the Best, Cameron

Who me? Never!

Great to have you here, John! Look forward to seeing more from you around here!

None of this is helpful without your crash log and your log.txt file. Please start a new topic, provide the scenario you are in to cause the crash, plus attach your logs as mentioned above.

The MU-2 is unlike all other activations hence your issue compared to our other products (hence the reason products like the Corvalis move over so easily). The MU-2 will be getting its first update in nearly three years to bring it up to snuff with our other products including the activation. This should be out very soon. In the meantime, so long as you have submitted a request for support we'll get to you in the order received.