Cameron

Something is wrong there. We definitely did not introduce them again. Is this now happening every sim session or just this once?

There are no further update plans on this product.

I notice that you are using the A320. Is this the JAR Designs one? Does the problem occur still if you fly a different aircraft?

For the foreseeable moment, this is correct.

Issue with X-Plane and changes that cannot be worked around for the CRJ. This is covered in other topics already.

Yes, was a typo. Meant to say "your". External view has more polys than internal. X-Plane draws more objects when you go outside.

You're problem is likely not memory leak related. It's wait-for-Saab-update related to see if code optimizations implemented help you.

It's far too early to even consider this.

Thanks, but that's already been discussed. We know it exists, we don't know why, and thus far neither does Laminar. No need to be redundant in what we already know.

For your setup just an install on the slave is necessary.

Closed per request.

Read instead. ...or are you saying you have this issue with the aircraft you develop?

I know people who wouldn't pay Apple's or Bose's premiums. I also know an overwhelming amount who would. You can't use simple percentage points as a way to gauge costs of an add-on. If that's how you apply logic, a reality check is in order. Supply and demand play a very large role in economics. Laminar's reach of people who buy the sim JUST for the sim without add-on's allows them an afforded opportunity to lower the cost of the sim. I remember when X-Plane was $299 prior to its growth spurt, and I suppose all the MSFS developers have it wrong now too. Heck, I can buy MSFS X for $19.99! Someone better write in to REX and PMDG about their deceptive, greedy profiteering quickly!

I know a lot of flight schools and people that would love to disagree with you. Overall you sound like a tough person to satisfy to begin with. No offense, but when you knock everything you buy it sounds like a matter of priorities are offset and a grain of salt to your word is to be taken. Um, no. The word "all" implies everyone. This is about as far off a statement as they come. You are in an underwhelming minority of people making such noise...trust me. Please take care in how you word things.

This makes no sense at all. That would imply that our customers reporting such improvements have the same exact setup as we do. Probability: Very unlikely.

How do you get that? It reads to me: Most of, almost all, majority, not all...but most. Your mileage may vary, but I'd say (as have others here) that the statement holds true for an overwhelming majority (and also clearly on the very reviews section you speak of). The wording is very clear. You're trying to interpret it as "SkyMaxx Pro guarantees you 100%, without doubt, improvement in FPS over default"...it doesn't say that.

Let's quote the product page, shall we? In fact, most of our test team showed that when running default X-Plane 10 clouds vs. SkyMaxx Pro clouds, SkyMaxx Pro had better frame rates over the default X-Plane 10 clouds! Where exactly did you see this as definitively applicable to you? Have a read around about SkyMaxx Pro and you'll quickly find that in almost all cases the statement holds true for our customers as well. It simply is a statement that explains the result to an overwhelming majority of people. It's far from broke. The memory leak is VERY slow moving. It is NOT something to tank performance. I personally run SMP on a lesser MBP setup than you (750M 2048MB) on a TB display. Attaining 30 fps with the setup is quite simple. It may be time for you to consider a fresh demo install of X-Plane with only SMP in it and see what happens there. If your performance is better in the demo, then you can be assured that there is likely something else playing "fun" here.

Click the LEGS key.

Green light means Valve is willing to talk. It does not mean for sale!

No sir.

Clouds are NOT always blue: http://www.x-aviation.com/catalog/skymaxx-p-101.html <---- These images are unaltered. This is dependent on your settings, including the sky colors AND time of day. Be sure that when you select a new sky color you properly re-load it within sim. No, you cannot change such saturation without changing sky as well. The sim depends on these things as a whole. You can certainly create or download a new sky color set to your liking, however.

You would know if we were.

It is implemented as intended.

Indeed, this is just old SASL developers using past logic that should have been changed back about a year ago but they never updated their manuals, even for the 757. There are no known conflicts.

This would be when CTOT is active. After you've disengaged the "airplane is yours". This will maintain speed based on angle of attack (or adjusting it). You still need throttle power to achieve optimal configuration.