giacer

I haven't intended to defend their decision or give a response against you. As both a customer and an entrepreneur, I want to make a point of view. Having two similar but not equal products can lead to slow development in the new product. After paying for the product, would you like to receive support? YES The development of the new version is slowed down, which results in buyers complaining. NO Then You agree to purchase it without any assistance? YES Surely, sooner or later, someone will complain about something doesn't work well that causes damage to reputation.

System RequirementsSimulator: X-Plane 12. Not compatible with X-Plane 11.Operating Systems: MacOS 12+ (at least Monterey) or Windows 10+Recommended: Modern CPU with 4+ Cores (3 GHz+), 16+ GB RAM, NVIDIA or AMD with 4+ GB VRAM. Simple, not sold, not supported, I doubt they sell it secretly. If it's not listed on the site, it's nowhere to be found.

This is with modern And this with ixeg DC3.log Log.txt

Yes only with dc3

Hi, I encountered a strange graphic problem and produced a short illustrative video, take a look at the right gizmo menu It is not a gizmo problem with X-plane, but with this DC-3 (Classic and Modern), with ixeg for example, it does not manifest I removed everything (scenery and plugins) to check for compatibility and clear up ideas. I am forced to use zink always, without zink 08/12 fps, with zink all planes at 25/35 fps, no problem without zink but I cant use It's incredibly annoying with for example XCPLPilot however the DC-3 is well usable; the DC-3 menus are not affected and there are no crashes DC3.log Log.txt

The default global scenery is at the minimum of plausibility, alternatively there is the one made from simheaven here which is based on OSM data, it's always plausible, it means that you could find the buildings really present, but maybe with height-shape-color a little different, however it is much better than the default Trains and cars often disappear or appear out of nowhere. It's plausible that there are rails and roads as VFR references, but cars and trains should avoid looking at them

@BulvaNo software is dying, simply Discord is used by developers and Laminar, and I think Discord is a forum killer, and also a "boomer" killer

Just so you know, the X-Plane price offered is limited, but it will soon increase (tic...tac...tic...tac) Read Buy It - X-Plane

Wow thanks for share

Press rectangular box then check

Thanks you for the update! I don't have any other liveries now

Hi, I have no issue, but I don't have XPRealistic previous SMP versions gave problems, try to remove the temporary XPRealistic

I installed with "fear" when I have read here, but I have no issue at the moment I don't have XPRealistic

I love SkyMaxx Pro, waiting for v5

I don't have nothing from aviotek, but maybe I think you’ll be lucky here

I confirm crash on AMD, but with 4.9.6.2 problem solved, thank you!

Hi, I am testing x-plane 11.50 b3, and SkyMAXX 4.9.2 too, occasionally I get an insufficient Vram warning (without frame drop or lag). From the SkyMAXX menu, I read a negative VRAM count, but it does not reflect the metric received by the AMD software (and total VRAM available), which I always keep active with this beta. X-plane config, no frame drop, lag or problem even with that advise on Thanks

Hi, the defaut GPS is realy limited try this http://forums.x-plane.org/index.php?app=downloads&showfile=16665 plugin for add waypoints

Thanks Goran!!

Hi Goran, I began 'playing' with plane maker (XP10.20), I made ​​changes to the AP artificial stability, roll seems reduced, smoothly find the position, even in straight and level flight, is no longer present. this video Show after/before Testing with weather CAVOK. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ToNQxQO_9a4 I hope it's useful, but certainly isn't the best solution, but it is one i found

I think a good demo, would be to introduce the aircraft, with a nice-serious video. with no special effects ... start-up, handling, advanced features, flight instrument at work etc.. Showing for last the exterior model...we fly inside the aircraft!

Could turn it into a restaurant for travellers on ice! ... for me would have made much ​​money. nice video thanks.

as a popup(like the GNS430-530)... working also well!....but sure integrated it's more realistic(?)...the garmin would be more realistic (i don't asking for this)...look at 1:33 in this video http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y_ClHJ5yA5w