-
Posts
322 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
12
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Latest X-Plane & Community News
Events
Downloads
Store
Everything posted by daemotron
-
solved Take-Off Flaps setting
daemotron replied to Dreamliner63's topic in Flight Procedures and Techniques
I think it's called Explania or something like that... -
Ah, let's ignore him & not have people like him spoil the party . Goran, you & the LES team are doing a fantastic job, and not just on the Saab. Just to extend that a bit, Cameron I highly appreciate how XA is handling update policies. All products I ever bought here have been supported and updated for free for much longer than I experienced with most other XP developers. Big thanks for this, you're really creating value here.
-
KSAT San Antonio International by Attitude Simulations
daemotron replied to wickedbacon's topic in Scenery Development
Absolutely brilliant!- 4 replies
-
- 1
-
- attitude simulatios
- ksat
-
(and 3 more)
Tagged with:
-
My colleagues from flight test had some fun with an A380: And no, it's not photoshopped. No idea how they convinced DFS and Eurocontrol to approve this route, but they did it. Besides, the baubles were flown manually... Link to this flight on FlightRadar24: https://www.flightradar24.com/data/aircraft/f-wwae#fd1fd63
-
Are you by chance using XP11.10 (beta or RC)? If yes, Laminar has chosen to implement vaccum gyro drift and random initialisation on start. Easiest fix by now: assign a key or button to the sim/instruments/DG_sync_mag command.
-
Used it only in XP10 so far. Not as immersive as the IXEG 737, but very good visuals and by now (v1.3) quite improved systems simulation (though IMO not study level). It has proven to operate quite stably on my system (no CTDs or whatsoever), but that's true for most models by now (with some sad exceptions). Liveries are not a problem, Rotate has provided a PSD paint kit. If you don't find what you're looking for, you can paint one yourself
-
Randomly enable the built-in IXEG failures - LUA script
daemotron replied to Tom Stian's topic in General Discussion
Hi, thanks for this comprehensive explanation. What I'm still wondering about is why a steady head wind component has to be balanced - normally, a steady head wind should allow for a slower landing ground speed, preserving tires and brakes. Using this correction partly gives away the advantage of a steady head wind. However, it is not needed to avoid dropping below critical air speed... so why is it done? Courtesy for ATC to avoid snailing on final, or...? -
Randomly enable the built-in IXEG failures - LUA script
daemotron replied to Tom Stian's topic in General Discussion
Hi Jan, I'm not sure I really understand the story of wind correction. Does it mean you apply min +5 Kts for gust precaution, and more if heavier gusts are announced? For the gust margin, it seems conceptually obvious to me (to avoid dropping below VREF due to wind gusts). But for the steady wind correction, I'm not really sure what the purpose is - the VREF is indicated airspeed after all (at least I thought so), so why is there such a correction to be applied? Can't be to ensure hitting the right IAS... Cheers Jesco -
Randomly enable the built-in IXEG failures - LUA script
daemotron replied to Tom Stian's topic in General Discussion
To quote Mike Ray: So if you're flying without any wind, the correction would be zero => you set the REF speed on the MCP (plus a gust margin). -
Randomly enable the built-in IXEG failures - LUA script
daemotron replied to Tom Stian's topic in General Discussion
Coincidently, Jan once did a video with a Hyd B leakage... (it was a slow leak, but with the same final results ) -
-
Heads up for version 1.1: Left NLG door texture fixed (was transparent from inside) Livery now comes in three flavours: SE-JOK (Johann Olav Koss) - the original livery G-BNML (Roger Moore) - joined the ACH fleet on Mar 1, 2017 D-ACBP (Berliner Philharmoniker) - joined the ACH fleet on Mar 1, 2017 Enjoy the update!
-
Does it happen only when you load the Saab from the quick selection screen? On some computers and in some situations Gizmo-driven aircrafts (at least, IXEG has the same issue, Tom confirmed it in one of the threads) do not initialise completely (or in the wrong order) when loaded from the quick selection screen, but they do when either loaded from the aircraft => open menu, or when rebooting Gizmo after opening the aircraft from the quick selection screen.
-
Good news - that means the Saab gets a second life in XP11, and we even get it refurbished at one point ( v2.0 - I'm fine with paying for an upgrade after all those years enjoying it in XP10)
-
Hm, not sure - on the first pic, the AP is clearly not engaged (visible on the EADI, but also the CMD A button is not lit). In the second pic, we don't see the EADI, but the CMD A button is lit in green. Looks more the AP was engaged with the FD already following LNAV and VNAV. From the log I would guess the problem is your route didn't permit for FL310 - apparently VNAV calculated the TOC to be at 9,983 ft, before reaching ADEXA (cf. VNAV calculations in your log file). Apparently you were climbing beyond the calculated TOC manually and then engaging the AP with VNAV and LNAV engaged. I suppose this could be linked to some ALT and/or Speed constraints in the selected STAR.
-
Thanks, I got it now. Here's what I did: As advised, I deleted the settings.dat (actually I only moved it to a location outside of the XP directory structure). I launched XP, and first thing I did was changing the RWC setting. However this did not create a new settings.dat file (don't know if it's intended to do so or not), so next I tweaked SMP itself back into my own settings. When hitting "Apply", the settings.dat file was created. I tried later on, but switching RWC settings didn't change the last modified date of the file. However, once I hit "Apply" in the SMP settings dialog itself, RWC settings seem to get recorded they way they're currently set.
-
I think our best chance is still with QPAC and then probably the RWDesign A330 (also QPAC-based). But yeah, would be great to have an Airbus at Flight Sim Labs level in XP...
-
Tried it without success I also checked file permissions, and it's ok also for "normal" mode. SMP itself btw. does not lose settings, it's only RWC...
-
Hello Maxx-XP team, I'm running XP 10.51 with SMP 4.0.1 and RWC 1.1, using NOAA as METAR source. Before I used SMP 3.3.2 with RWC 1.0 and NOAA. After upgrading, RWC loses the "always" setting when closing XP: So after launching XP, I always have to set it back to "always": After having done that, it stays in this position until I close XP - then the setting is lost again... Any idea what could cause this? Could it be linked to NOAA? Cheers Jesco Log.txt GizmoLog.txt
-
QPAC is still on it (their v3 should bring some more depth to system modelling), but they will take some more time to complete (bug sqashing takes more time than they planned). As there are some more 'buses out there using the QPAC plugin, I hope for some better Airbus models available somewhere in 2017 (RW's A330-300, FF A350-900 apart from QPACs own A320). I don't know if Peter will integrate the update in his models, though...
-
SMP 4 is just awesome! Usually I tend to being hypercritical with addons, but this one's just absolutely extraordinary - I simply love the new cumulus towering impressively and slightly menacingly above the scenery, and the performance is about the same as SMP 3. John, Frank, great job done, thank you very much!
- 1 reply
-
- 4
-
OK, here is the video: The effect is not as strong as during my previous flight; here the pitch is only maintained until M.72 is reached, but the noticeable pitch up happens. Jump to 1:55 of the video, and you can see the cut over from IAS to MACH, and subsequently the V/S increasing to 3,000 fpm, staying there for half a minute, and then slowly decrease. NB I was apparently wrong - it has nothing to do with tailwind (as this video was taken in a headwind situation) - but both situations had some turbulence in common, so maybe that's a trace... IXEG_FMS_debug.txt GizmoLog.txt Log.txt
-
Philipp & Javier already fed back they had apparently some issues with the 1.7 build (among others it seems the windows one reference against two different MSVC++ versions, plus some bugs with XP11). So they fix these issues, re-do the build, and then they will distribute the update (and also replace the current 1.7 at the org).
-
Hi Nils, yes, the speed bug stayed in the same position. I'll try capturing a video to show the effect.