Jump to content

Leaderboard

Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 03/04/2012 in all areas

  1. Seriously dude, you are acting like a real idiot. I have several FS2004 conversions of very nice, high quality scenery's (one of them being KBOS, which I'm sure almost every X-Planer has installed) all done with written, EXPLICIT permission, which I could fish out of my email inbox for ANY of the moderators to see WHENEVER they wanted. Yes, I am providing "the crowd" with excellent quality free stuff, and I don't go boasting like a loser on forums like this one. You seriously need to grow up and act like a mature teenager. Can't wait till you get banned from this forum, too.
    2 points
  2. I'm having a hard time believing this one...
    2 points
  3. I just released a new version of SkyMAXX. This release has 4 options for you to choose from: Vivid----the original SkyMAXX Sepia---looks like an old photo Mild---toned down version of SkyMAXX Extreme---clouds are drawn on the vivid sky colors The extreme version has very low resolution clouds and it isn't as easy as up scaling the skycolor image size for a better result. With that being said it is still a nice effect and great if you have lower end hardware that cannot run clouds in X-Plane10 Clicky: SkyMAXX
    1 point
  4. When that can be done globally in a file less than 100mb I will eat your shorts.....
    1 point
  5. I'm using Zones-Photo X-Plane + XPOSM + OSM2XP sceneries. X-Plane is my favorite way to check everything I add in OpenStreetMap.
    1 point
  6. This latest version is good, Thanks
    1 point
  7. I think I smell a troll...
    1 point
  8. 1 point
  9. ...and cue apologetic attitude in an attempt to win back everyone you alienated during your tirade so that you can stage a "surprise" comeback in the near future. Very predictable.
    1 point
  10. It is a sad fool who steals the works of others and shares them as "his own" while believing they're making the world a better place. You're a deluded little boy zroman. Grow up.
    1 point
  11. Well the hope of an aircraft mad completely made by you has gone. Don't know why I even hoped that you would get your act together.
    1 point
  12. GIF of the year that one!
    1 point
  13. We like the power-ups. You can retro-fit your Cessna with rocket boosters and 15 propellers. It's awes0mez0rz. - CK.
    1 point
  14. Uttering Threats Threaten death or bodily harm Under the Criminal Code, it is an offence to knowingly utter or convey a threat to cause death or bodily harm to any person. It is also an offence to threaten to burn, destroy or damage property or threaten to kill, poison or injure an animal or bird that belongs to a person. Penalties The offence of utter death threat may be prosecuted by summary conviction or by indictment. If prosecuted by indictment, the accused person is entitled to elect trial by jury and upon conviction is liable to up to five years jail. In most cases, however, the offence is prosecuted by summary conviction, requiring a trial before a lower court justice. In this case, the maximum penalty is 18 months imprisonment. What the Crown must prove To secure a conviction at trial, the Crown must prove that the person making the threat did so knowingly. That is, the prosecution must show that he was aware of the words used and the meaning they would convey. It also must show that he intended the threat to be taken seriously, that is, to intimidate or strike fear into the recipient. It is not necessary that the person making the threat intend to carry it out or be capable of doing so. The motive for making the threat is equally irrelevant. In assessing whether the words constitute a threat, they must be considered objectively. The court must ask: In the context and circumstances in which the words were spoken or written, the manner in which they were used, and the person to whom they were directed would they convey a threat to a reasonable person? A history of violence between the parties may support a finding that the words were intended as a threat. Whether or not the person making the threat has an apparent ability to carry it out when the words are spoken, his use of gestures or acts, whether the recipient of the words takes them seriously, and disparity in size between the speaker and the recipient of the threat may all be relevant to an assessment of the speaker’s intent. Conditional threat A threat may be conditional. In 1986, the Ontario Court of Appeal ruled that it was a threat when a man phoned police and said he would shoot an officer who wanted to question him if the officer did not leave his property. Idle threats No offence is committed, however, if a threat is innocently made. The offence is not meant to criminalize idle threats or words blurted out only in anger, desperation, bitterness or frustration. Words said in jest or in a manner that they could not be taken seriously do not constitute a threat. Intended victim need not know of threat To be an offence, the threat need not be made directly to the intended victim. The intended victim need not even be aware of the threat. Nor is it necessary that the person making the threat intend that it be communicated to the target of the threat. The purpose of the offence is to protect the exercise of freedom of choice by preventing intimidation. Lawful excuse A threat made against a trespasser may be justified. However, the property owner must first ask the trespasser to leave and give him a reasonable opportunity to do so. A person in imminent danger or distress in the face of an aggressor may be justified in making threats as an act of self-defence. Criminal Code Of Canada PART VIII OFFENCES AGAINST THE PERSON AND REPUTATION Assaults Uttering threats 264.1 (1) Every one commits an offence who, in any manner, knowingly utters, conveys or causes any person to receive a threat (a) to cause death or bodily harm to any person; ( to burn, destroy or damage real or personal property; or © to kill, poison or injure an animal or bird that is the property of any person. Punishment (2) Every one who commits an offence under paragraph (1)(a) is guilty of (a) an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding five years; or ( an offence punishable on summary conviction and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding eighteen months. Idem (3) Every one who commits an offence under paragraph (1)( or © (a) is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding two years; or ( is guilty of an offence punishable on summary conviction. R.S., 1985, c. 27 (1st Supp.), s. 38; 1994, c. 44, s. 16.
    1 point
×
×
  • Create New...