For beginners, what a laugh. My instructor has 10,000 hours already and is an ATPL holder with a CFI-I rating. He is a qualified examiner under CAD HK. My ground school classmates? Well let me tell you, have definitely will have more airmanship than you do Peter. So tell me:Principles of gyroscopic instruments What is a vacuum instrument system? What is deep stall? What is the Coriolis effect? What is P-Factor and how does it work? How to calculate drift angle? What is 60 to 1 rule? What does "RVSM" stand for? What is class G airspace? Does radio signals travel faster across land or sea? What is the minimum altitude for the Shek Kong Area? So peter, tell me all the KingAirs are great and I can only hope Carenado can make the flight model extremely accurate. They nailed the looks but they should seriously re think their flight model. The polygons on their models are highly optimized and that's great. The airfoils do need some makeovers. Don't forget Dan already told all of us that Carenado does NOT provide training level aircraft. I repeat, DOES NOT! I still will not fly Carenado though, I am afraid it will give me bad habits. I am really not interested in this area of study, however a simple google search will suffice and give enough detailed information. I am looking forward to this king air... And I hope to contribute to this community in a positive way, however you seemed to ruin things quite a bit...but that's my take. When I said it must be for beginners, that was a massive sarcasm quote. If you don't tell which is sarcasm and which isn't, there's a sign that you have brain damage. http://indianapublicmedia.org/amomentofscience/comprehending-sarcasm/ You have my condolences. (Sarcasm in case you don't have the power to process it) Let's draw this to a close, we both have different expertise, mine on add on development, you on your "aircraft training in the Hong Kong aviation club" whatsoever...and "military training"