Goran_M

Hmmm, we'd like to think the Saab will be on par with a PMDG product.

I'll check into this sometime today and post back.

Thanks, gents!

Definitely. We'll try. No promises. We really want to finish it as soon as possible, and the bug list is getting shorter by the day.

Valentin (Hueyman) 1. Gizmo does not interfere, in any way, with any SASL driven product. It was Cameron and Ben Russell who worked with Ben Supnik to ensure this problem was eliminated. No one else. 2. If you have issues with any Gizmo driven product, you are expected to either: a. post a question about it in the relevant support forums for THAT product. b. Submit a support ticket through the X-Aviation support page. If you want to stay up to date on news relating to Gizmo or anything else related to X-Aviation add ons, it is all available on X-Aviation's Facebook page, which gets updated frequently. This thread is not a support thread for any add on. It is not for making false claims that are unsupported beyond just your word. Gizmo has been in development for 6-7 years and Ben Russell has worked extremely hard to make it a very powerful scripting language while, at the same time, ensuring it causes no problems for us or our valued customers. And that work has also been in the form of years of developer feedback on features and bug fixes (including developers who have SASL driven add ons) just to make sure no one has any problems. You're more than welcome to post any issues you are having with any X-Aviation product in the X-Pilot forums, but we expect you to do it respectfully, through the proper channels, and with enough evidence that substantiates your claims.

Next update will address this as well. Should be out very soon.

This project is definitely alive. It is being worked on when either Jim, Theo or myself have nothing to do on the Saab. The Saab is taking most of our time now, especially as it is in the hands of external testers who are providing valuable feedback and bug reports. Some work has been done on the Citation, including coding some systems. Once the Saab is done, I'm off on a well deserved, overdue vacation, and then we'll throw ourselves into the Citation full time.

Unusual. Please post again when you try it tonight. If anyone else can confirm this, please let us know.

Hope you enjoy it!

At the moment, a video will delay testing. Perhaps when our workload lightens up a bit, we may get a video done.

Don't want to say too much about the rain now, but what I will say is it was a pretty big job to create. (Just rain...go figure!? But it took 3-4 weeks to finish) I'll definitely look at adding it to the DC-3, but seeing as the Saab is in beta testing, I want to wait until after the Saab is out before the next DC-3 update.

Has no one picked out what that screenshot shows?

JS32 length is a slash over 47 ft. Saab 340A is just under 65 ft.

Been working on the flight model trying to straighten out a few performance issues. It should be out within weeks.

I should have put the in my last post.

The day SASL is put into the DC-3 or the MU 2 is the day I quit developing add ons.

Ok Ben...THAT'S a good one! I actually laughed.

^-------What he said Just to add to that, we COULD choose to go the "lite" road, but we gave up on that and we're only interested in creating near 100% procedure level aircraft add ons.

We're addressing a few things that people have mentioned and the trim indicator is definitely one of them.

This is not part of our immediate line-up. It's a "We might do it if we get around to it" project.

We don't like giving out release dates, purely because there can be many unknown variables. (Fixing 1 thing which can break 5 others) All I can safely say is we are rapidly approaching external testing.

Oops. I meant EMB 120. (See what happens when working without caffeine?) We're on the fence about it because we can get all the information on it, but a slight downside is that it is quite similar to a Saab 340 with regards to systems.

The ERJ 120 is another one near the top of the list and is also being heavily considered.

We're considering several turboprop options after the Citation, and the 1900D is definitely near the top of the list.