Cameron

Likely not since they look for default datarefs not used in the plane.

I guess we better put a face to a name: Care to keep up your antics, Ben?

I'll make a bet with you that it'll be released when it's done. If you want to take me up on that offer let me know!

I think this one would have been better without the song.

What is 24 bit? Anyways..... What you're describing means you're trying to fly the Falco in 64-bit, then you opened the MU-2. That doesn't work...especially the Falco. For now, only fly the Falco in 32-bit mode.

All of it.

Thanks for that! A lot of thought and work went into the design of the new pages for this. We are happy with the result as well.

Indeed. This has been a very big process, guys. The entire website has been getting a makeover in the process to ensure information is clear to our customers, including OS architecture support and X-Plane type. This is a site wide product page format upgrade, and it is brand new from the ground up. Please bear with us as we bring things online in segments. We have all been working overtime on this from Tom with the MU-2, to Ben with fixing bugs or improving the plug-in, and over to myself with web architecture. It's been non-stop go go go.

Thanks for the awesome compliment, Kris! Cheers!

Steven, Sometimes it amazes me how much you don't "get it." My mind tells me I should refuse to accept that you're as far from a normal society mental state as you make yourself out to be, but perhaps you genuinely are just as you make yourself out to be? I swear to myself you're smarter than that...in fact, I know you are. I refuse to accept that you're dumb, so don't act dumb. Multiple individuals in this topic have posted in here about this for a reason. There's NO doubt that your connection to Dan Klaue and his work at Carenado is the driving force behind your postings here. You're trying to argue otherwise, and that's just dumb. Very few. There is, however, a staggering amount of Carenado/Dan Klaue discussion out of you, to which you do have quite the affiliation. It ranges from releases, to upcoming, to sales, to updates. Can't say there's much of that from you anywhere about anyone else. You're focusing in on the wrong point. No one has disdain for Carenado or their great products. One livery more than two years ago in 2011 (which is pretty normal for you to make liveries anyhow) for 30 posts about Carenado here. Not the same. This is a horrible analogy. Everyone buys what they like, Steven. The difference is you have access to products prior to their release as a beta tester for Carenado. You choose to buy it, but we both know you don't have to buy it. If you wanted a Nikon, Mac, or Toyota you'd have to buy them. You don't beta test for them. Dumb. Competing products are good for the community, and in turn, good for people like Jim. We need more competing products. No, one time someone beat you to it. Ah, yes. That's right. The vaporware topic that you tried to play off as something that was intended to be funny after it backfired on you, and the topic about your disappointment recently on an upcoming update, and your post about X-Aviation and patience all the while rolling your eyes. I don't even have to ask Jim to know the answer to this. It's a combination of your anti-XA topics as of late, coupled with your fanboy Dan Klaue topics (a person who vocally has a distaste for anything XA). The correlation is uncanny. You can't seriously be that dumb. Again, I refuse to accept it. Oh, good. We'll see what happens in the coming hours then! We appreciate you taking the time to better the community and spread the word about the next XA product update, for which you are a customer of. This topic, as usual for things that you have been a part of or started as of late, has essentially become zero sum and is now closed, Steven. I can't even see a glimpse of good out of further discussion. People are free to post about Carenado or any other products all they want. From you, however, it's becoming rather repetitive and annoying. Perhaps you should back off a bit. Your affiliation to the developer of this product and your recent onslaught of anti-XA behavior is what's killing you here. That's a toxic combination. Had it just been your affiliation alone you probably wouldn't be getting so much grief, but you'd definitely be forever known as the cheerleader.

Hi there! You'll want to install WED (world editor) and edit out the conflicting scenery areas. WED is a free download that is provided by the creators of X-Plane. I'm not able to post a more in depth how to right this minute, but if you have questions after exploring WED and need more help please post questions and someone will likely be able to reply quicker than I. Welcome to the community!

Would be cool for sure!

You caught that pretty quick!

This topic is closed. Simply put, give credit where it's due if it's due.

The XPFW aircraft do not have exterior objects, only interior VC objects. You are likely exporting the acf as an OBJ and comparing that in Blender/AC3D, claude181. As Michael has stated and credited, his files utilize the exterior objects from Hiroshi. Permission for this has clearly been granted and shown. You are suggesting that the FLIGHT MODEL obj (.acf file) is likely copied and made for his aircraft, and is in violation of copyright. Perhaps this is correct, but I'm going to throw a wrench in this one... As the founder of XPFW, and a person who knows the people at XPFW all on a face to face basis, I'd say no one cares that the aircraft file was used from 2008. That SAID, credit should be given, so if such is the case, Michael, please consider making that part of it right. End of story. We don't need to debate and point fingers in here all day. Lord knows the community could use some free aircraft that make the sim look better anyhow.

Yes. In what scenarios or if ever it will occur for you is another story though. On my windows dev machine with everything cranked up I am unable to flop the sim, but I am sure someone out there may be able to hit that wall. Entire plane is driven by Gizmo.

That's kinda the purpose of reading the manuals that we take the time to write, isn't it?

Goran or Theo can both attest to the fact that glass and things like nav/strobe lights have been big sticking points from my end. We're all very happy with those results.

True story.

LOL. Thanks for the compliments!

Hi, Andy, Our system shows your activation has not been going through because you are not using proper casing in your e-mail when entered in the form. You've been using all lowercase letters, whereas you purchased and have an account with the 'A' and 'G' being capitalized. P.S., we have a customer support contact form for situations like this, and it will typically garner you relatively fast replies. Since no one on these forums aside from X-Aviation representatives can tend to things like this, your best bet is always our contact form. Happy flying, and thanks for the purchase!

There are no plans to further develop the CRJ other than to maintain its compatibility as it stands now.

You realize you're replying to a quote made in November of 2012, close to when 64-bit first came out, right? Aside from PilotEdge, are there even ANY online flying plug-ins for VATSIM or IVAO that are even 64-bit? I'm not aware of any. The baby arrived weeks ago. Ben has a ton of drive and continues to work on Gizmo daily, which is rather impressive given the circumstances.

Gizmo is currently in beta: http://forums.x-pilot.com/topic/5024-gizmo-64bit-beta/

No, Linux isn't yet supported but is planned eventually at the moment. For now the focus is on Mac and Windows, so that will be how we will initially launch more than likely.