-
Posts
133 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
3
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Latest X-Plane & Community News
Events
Downloads
Store
Everything posted by ARTIK
-
I would like to share with you insights on my recent experiences in comparing the performance of two top photorealistic sceneries on very different computer systems: The zoom level 18 custom USA scenery compared to Orbx TrueEarth North California HD zoom level 17. As you can already see the comparison will be very unfair … Not fair to my scenery, which is much higher resolution so computer will need 4x more data to transfer during the flight from the hard disk! The difference is huge. I do not use SSDs because for me they are just too small (I install removable 10TB disks with the USA regions). The Orbx scenery was installed on the fast SSD. In addition, the mesh resolution is significantly higher in my scenery, it is 1/3 arc second. This is the highest resolution covering the entire US territory. I compared my scenery and computer performance using other video while testing the Orbx scenery around San Francisco. When I saw this movie, I decided to check how my professional X-Plane system will deal with the Orbx scenery and the fastest CPU/GPU combo. The City of San Francisco is my favorite place to which I traveled with my brother many times when real world flying across the America. I know the Golden Gate quite well from all sides. Are these all unfair points? Not at all Both scenes work on completely different computer systems. My system based on Intel 6700K and the system with the Orbx scenery was installed on a computer with Intel 9900K – i.e. 3 generations newer … My GPU is 1080ti and 2080ti on the other system. And I would forget, there is a slight difference in the resolution between the system… My system works with 12 times higher resolution!! Yes, the system with the Orbx scenery renders just shy of 8.3% pixels of the professional XP11 system… Immersive Designers: https://sound4xplane.wordpress.com My virtual aviation: https://andrzejartymowicz.wordpress.c... https://youtu.be/lSWWgrHUbdQ
-
- 12 comments
-
- aerobridge
- full detail
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
YPPF Parafield Airport and Adelaide City Photoreal
ARTIK reviewed chris k's file in DSF Scenery Packages
- 3 comments
-
- Photoscenery
- Orthophoto
-
(and 2 more)
Tagged with:
-
- 1 comment
-
- orthophoto
- ISDG
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
-
- 17 comments
-
Felis is doing advanced Tu-154m for the XP10... Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
-
You'll need to overclock your system to get 2400MHz. Check dog.asus.com/forum for details. http://rog.asus.com/forum/showthread.php?27272-A-Beginner-s-Guide-To-Setting-Up-RAM-Speed&country=&status=
-
Yeah but I'm still missing zero blur XP9 (e.g. runway) textures.
-
7970 have a lot of OC headroom that's for sure (more than 680), but we need the Laminar/AMD Fix to start using XP10. Personally I'm waiting for 6GB AMD7970 Eyefinity 6 because I'm on 5 monitor setup (unfortunately GTX680 is limited to 3). On the other side Nvidia is preparing high end GPU with 512bit bus. People with high resolution systems (4-10Mpix) are still waiting for good GPU solution and optimized 64bit app. regards arti
-
your marketing skills are sky high, congrat
-
very funny. prove it;) video + screenshots...
-
Try fantastic Cloud Maxx beta and report speed up:) Turn down cloud detail to few% http://maxx-xp.hiking-pa.com/?page_id=147 regards arti
-
Oh sorry for the typo, sure 4870.