Leaderboard

Well, technically sharklets are available for ceo A320s too But if it makes you feel better, this is freshly rolled-out from my workshop...

Hi guys, a new video! I try the Dash 8 from FJS, going from Bromma (ESSB) in Stockholm, to Bergen in Norway (ENBR). Enjoy! https://youtu.be/YkWkqp70uI4

Indeed it does! Surprisingly easy too actually, everything uses the same animation datarefs and such so other than a repositioning almost no modelling work was needed! I did something similar to the A330 and it was much more difficult... Here's another shot with some clearer details

Hello Captains, It is with great excitement we announce the opening of the IXEG discussion forums. You'll note multiple sections here. The first is where you've now ended up, which is General Discussion topics about IXEG as a whole and any future products, or questions you may have to ask to the team. The second is an official Work In Progress section where multiple topics will be created by the team to show you progress of add-ons (at this time the 737 Classic). I have the privilege to show you a few exclusive 737 Classic screenshots on a beta test flight I did between KSFO and KLAX. Before I get on to these, however, you should check out the brand new video showcasing the 737 Classic's FMC route editing features. Now, enjoy the screenshots! NOTE: Click images to see larger!

Thanks kickremi! As said in the description, both sceneries are made by tdg, and is free to download from X-Plane.org.

If you are lucky you can find the 737 Flight Manual from Continental Airlines online. It includes the use of checklists and CRM as well!

That shot's even better! Makes a lot more sense without the Neo wingtips! This just makes me more disappointed that Jar haven't gone ahead and added the other engine options!

Thank you. I appreciate it. John

I just purchased this airport from x-plane.org. How do I go about getting the static aircraft option? It did not come with the purchase. Thanks in advance for your help. John

Hi Cameron, don't get me wrong, as I already mentioned I'm totally with you for those niche applications. I don't think that it's financially viable to support all three platforms. If you would have preferred the combination Linux / Windows I would be more happy (and I guess this could be a serious thought, since the quantitative difference between linux and mac users isn't that big), but I totally accept running my Simulators under Windows (This is not just due to your upcoming software release. I mostly run FSX/P3D, so I'm bound to Windows anyway). My experiences regarding software development may differ quite drastically to yours when it comes to deployment for linux due to the fact that my background is another. I started with development under linux and since then solely developed under and for linux. And as i mentioned in my post above, deployment for windows is giving me really hard times. It's just not that easy to generalize the aspects of software development and deployment regarding the different platforms, it all depends from where you are coming from and which background you have and what you are developing (as mentioned I'm developing numerical simulations, and It is a pain in the a** to find precompiled libraries for Windows that I need for my software. Compiling them from scratch can be a pain in the a** too under Windows) . I just wanted to point that out As for the "wannabe" linux users (I might have been too harsh with the word "wannabe" here. It depends on what you want to define as a "true" linux user For me it's the kind of persons that stops crying and starts developing his own open source aircraft and simulator. I'm not crying though, so don't expect me to even try developing one ). You are only reading and hearing from those linux users cause the others simply don't engage on this kind of topics. I mean why would they? The only thing you'll ever hear from the linux users is them asking or demanding for linux support. I bet there might be quite a few people, even on this forum, that use linux on a daily basis, for entertainment, work and development, that are totally fine with running your software under Windows or Mac, like me. And none of them will come up and say "Hey great work in not supporting Linux, greetings the Linux guy". It's just not the way internet works nowadays. You either are happy and say nothing or you give the developers a hard time. And due to the anonymity quite a few of them are likely to get offensive and choose the wrong words. Just read a few YouTube comments There are of course quite a few black sheeps under all those linux users, like in any other community. And i truly understand that they will leave a bad taste in your mouth. I simply beg you to not generalize Best regards, BaBene

The problem is with the navigraph inconsistent format. The fix needs to come from them. We began with navigraph...used several iterations of the data and its only recently that we are seeing this borked set. We use a format that is common to existing products so there is NO reason you cannot use navigraph. You just need to understand that some procedures may not show up in the CDU during procedure selection. This is not our issue to "code around". We are shipping with Aerosoft's data set because it is currently the most accurate and it is formatted correctly. If you want to swap out to Navigraph, you certainly have that option. We will try and get a dialog with them to get an IXEG published and will voice our concerns, but they have been slow to respond so there is no telling when it may happen. Just know that we do want both sources available to customers. -tkyler

We are at exactly 93.77% completion.