GrahamH Posted February 18, 2012 Report Posted February 18, 2012 (edited) I believe this is a different plane, but there's a high quality freeware 777-300er available here.http://www.zolanskisden.blogspot.comThat's me landing at YVR. Edited February 18, 2012 by Graham H
Kaphias Posted February 18, 2012 Report Posted February 18, 2012 If that's from that Zroman kid, it's likely an illegal MSFS conversion.
GrahamH Posted February 18, 2012 Author Report Posted February 18, 2012 (edited) You mean like project oblivion? If that's the case, than I will (sadly) delete this plane. I guess I'll have to wait for xpjets. Edited February 18, 2012 by Graham H
Charlie Posted February 18, 2012 Report Posted February 18, 2012 You mean like project oblivion? If that's the case, than I will (sadly) delete this plane. I guess I'll have to wait for xpjets. I think that this particular conversion is legal
GrahamH Posted February 18, 2012 Author Report Posted February 18, 2012 Innocent until proven guilty in my books. I hope you're right charlie. I've been looking for a more detailed 777 for some time. 1
Sethesus Posted February 19, 2012 Report Posted February 19, 2012 XP 10 bloggers said that this one was legal.
Baber20 Posted February 19, 2012 Report Posted February 19, 2012 He says that it is a legal conversion of Hiroshi's Posky 777 for FSX.
GrahamH Posted February 19, 2012 Author Report Posted February 19, 2012 Well there ya go. Thanks guys.
namaui Posted February 19, 2012 Report Posted February 19, 2012 That zroman guy has been proven guilty more often than not.
zroman Posted February 26, 2012 Report Posted February 26, 2012 idk if you'll beleive me or not, but i can garuntee that this aircraft is done without any copying ( based it off the default 777) and you Can ASK Hiroshi himself whether or not i had permission to post this aircraft. also, be sure to check out my MD-80 (now released) and 767 coming soon!
karingka Posted February 26, 2012 Report Posted February 26, 2012 Well, if you say so... You should try showing the .org your emails of proof and maybe they'll un-ban you.
zroman Posted February 27, 2012 Report Posted February 27, 2012 Well, if you say so... You should try showing the .org your emails of proof and maybe they'll un-ban you.TBH, i feel that six7 just hates me i don't think they'll ever let me back, (unless all of you protest) but be sure to check up on my aircrafts on my blog k? as it is now, the only place where these aircrafts will be uploaded is 4shared.
GrahamH Posted February 27, 2012 Author Report Posted February 27, 2012 Sigh. I guess I made this thread get off topic.
zroman Posted February 27, 2012 Report Posted February 27, 2012 Sigh. I guess I made this thread get off topic. well if you want i can continue talking about my 777
Charlie Posted February 27, 2012 Report Posted February 27, 2012 well if you want i can continue talking about my 777 I watched your video tutorials, they were really good
FirstOfficerTom Posted February 27, 2012 Report Posted February 27, 2012 You seem to elude quite constantly form actual evidence showing us and those at the org that you are not illegally converting aircraft.
zroman Posted February 27, 2012 Report Posted February 27, 2012 (edited) gimme a few moments Edited February 27, 2012 by zroman
zroman Posted February 28, 2012 Report Posted February 28, 2012 http://zolanskisden.blogspot.com/2012/02/dispelling-rumors.htmli don't like venting, but this is me venting. there is profanity. this should also supply you with sufficient proof 1
karingka Posted February 28, 2012 Report Posted February 28, 2012 Well, the fact that you messed up the first time (uploading a copyrighted file without permission) grants them every right to ban you personally. The fact that they ban people who use your internet is also ok, because they need to make sure it's not you with another account. I'm sure that if you send a personal email to the owner of the website (Nicolas) with all your explaniations (and your approval emails from the authors of the original aircraft, which for some reason you still haven't shown us) he might let you re-join, but that is highly unlikely after what you posted on your "blog". 1
namaui Posted February 28, 2012 Report Posted February 28, 2012 Well, the fact that you messed up the first time...Don't forget the second time.
FirstOfficerTom Posted February 28, 2012 Report Posted February 28, 2012 (edited) I think we have quite the right to accuse you as you've a history of illicit activity in this respect. The comment on your 'vent' saying they're all boring old fellas with sticks up our asses is plain out of order. With that kind of attitude it's surprising you get any positive attention. Edited February 28, 2012 by FirstOfficerTom
Cameron Posted February 28, 2012 Report Posted February 28, 2012 The comment on your 'vent' saying we're all boring old fellas with sticks up our asses is plain out of order.You realize the context of that text was not directed at you but a certain sites staff, do you not? Unless you're a member of said staff?
FirstOfficerTom Posted February 28, 2012 Report Posted February 28, 2012 Thanks for pointing that out, mis-read.
zroman Posted February 28, 2012 Report Posted February 28, 2012 here's the message, giving me full ability to use his aircrafts.is that proof enough?P.S, could one of you send a message to YYZatcboy? i want to use his basic 767 model as the base for my 767 aircrafts
Recommended Posts