donoscar

I said it in another forum and repeat myself here we shouldn't be comparing IXEG vs PMDG or XP vs. P3D, and even less the combination of products. these are two different products on different platforms addressing different customer types. I wouldn't want to put a 737 C into the hands of a few of my sim colleagues, they just wouldn't even get to the point of flying her and I would end up giving private support one by one. XP is too much hassle for them, FSX/PMDG is exactly what they need in terms of out of the box and onto the runway. If I remember the initial hassles I had after my shift from FSX a few months ago with XP, the way of controlling views, settings and its different plugins... Lua, SASL etc etc... and I have a bit of a clue how to handle a PC. Personally I prefer the IXEG/XP combination for many of the reasons above, but then I am really curious to see what PMDG have been able to do on XP with their DC-6. Competition will push every developer further, and that is good news for XP. IXEG keep up the great work, one of the key difrerentiators for this small group of talented developers is the first class support you get: one month in the market and we are already at 4th patch. I know other devs that do not even care about proper communication after launch.

thanks, will have to investigate in that case.

I am using a rudder pedal too and my feeling is that when trying to use the toe-breaks to slightly reduce speed before a turn, the breaks hit in once i am well above let s say 30% of the axis length and hit in pretty strong, so that it becomes rather a hard breaking instead of a soft adjustment. Anyone else has that or could it be due to my axis sensitivities or other?

lol isn't the variety of humanity great. there is one thing we had to learn a long time ago: use Google translator as we have to do so many times ... cheers

LFMT

Grüsse aus Südfrankreich, hier erst grad aufgestanden (spanisches Blut ) in der Hoffnung der erste Download -Stau sei vorbei, aber ich sehe, noch nix fettig... werd mir wohl noch nen Kaffee machen muessen.

i might actually do a flight to Renton and pick up mine directly at the factory .. just to keep me from checking the store every 5 min lol

will you set up a launch promo thanks to the generous order of SwissCyul or will you rather order some Champagne for the launch party

guys, just tried to cheat the system by changing the date to April 23rd. didn't work

initially got your statement wrong I think: you give 130 bucks to your wife, she disappears and leaves you and the new baby alone for the weekend. thinking about it, this sounds like the thing to do, though it will probably cost more if we add the kids on top

just counting the number of pair of shoes she has (in action, on standby, in case....) yup... just thinking about above post again, don't give 'em ideas to increase prices, shoe makers won't reduce them that's for sure and women's shoe addiction is also sth you cannot control

so that one is out, one thing less you can do... of course you can start debating about the price, I'm sure the discussion will soon start, so there is sth you can hook on to kill time, but this kind of activity is not my cup of tea. I will shake up my JARs and FF's, they will anyway collect some dust.

do as i do guys... fly your airplanes you have in the hangar, I think you won't touch 'em for a while after Saturday.. it will keep you from watching the clock or calling up X-aviation.com every five min. that's what i do ;-)

well, i tried both, a plane that has a good scroll wheel support and a few planes with pretty good clickspot. I still prefer the wheel scroll, probably because i use x-camera and have few use of the zoom function with the mouse. Anyway, this is a matter of taste and I would agree that the best would be to have an option to activate/disactivate depending on custom taste

I have my private flight attendant at home, and if I fly during acceptable hours I get the first class service

I couldn't care less about a missing feature... i prefer time is invested in other smaller items that are really visible and have an impact on your interaction rather than in such a complex modelling. I would probably look at the wing-flex three times short after purchase but then forget about it, as it adds nothing to the experience of flying. Apart from a nice visual, I am not sure the actual flexing and vibrations have any impact on the flight model, and if so, it would probably require a lot of modelling and months of testing to validate such effects. anyway.... get the bird right on its model/systems/basic functions and then investigate more fancy things, I am fully ok with the announced non-working-list. but for me, having made the conversion from FSX recently, definitely mouse wheel support will be a highly appreciated a connection to FMC to display on remote tablet through an explorer would be awesome, but please don't limit it to android or mac version. I use it through a common networked windows 10 touch notebook with FSX. Flight plan export features for PFPX instead of creating your own planning and performance calculation software btw, the bird looks awesome