Cameron

You can download the updated plugin at your leisure. The license check is normal.

The log you posted does not even show the CRJ as the active aircraft open in sim.

Yes, give that a try.

Do you have some kind of a firewall on your computer?

Nice video, Dave!

Other than it being a texture mimicking snow on the runway, I don't know the exact files.

Conrad, If you haven't yet received a reply something went wrong. Please re-submit.

You were never obligated to do so to begin with.

That's like saying you're not to be trusted.

Something is wrong there. We definitely did not introduce them again. Is this now happening every sim session or just this once?

There are no further update plans on this product.

I notice that you are using the A320. Is this the JAR Designs one? Does the problem occur still if you fly a different aircraft?

For the foreseeable moment, this is correct.

Issue with X-Plane and changes that cannot be worked around for the CRJ. This is covered in other topics already.

Yes, was a typo. Meant to say "your". External view has more polys than internal. X-Plane draws more objects when you go outside.

You're problem is likely not memory leak related. It's wait-for-Saab-update related to see if code optimizations implemented help you.

It's far too early to even consider this.

Thanks, but that's already been discussed. We know it exists, we don't know why, and thus far neither does Laminar. No need to be redundant in what we already know.

For your setup just an install on the slave is necessary.

Closed per request.

Read instead. ...or are you saying you have this issue with the aircraft you develop?

I know people who wouldn't pay Apple's or Bose's premiums. I also know an overwhelming amount who would. You can't use simple percentage points as a way to gauge costs of an add-on. If that's how you apply logic, a reality check is in order. Supply and demand play a very large role in economics. Laminar's reach of people who buy the sim JUST for the sim without add-on's allows them an afforded opportunity to lower the cost of the sim. I remember when X-Plane was $299 prior to its growth spurt, and I suppose all the MSFS developers have it wrong now too. Heck, I can buy MSFS X for $19.99! Someone better write in to REX and PMDG about their deceptive, greedy profiteering quickly!

I know a lot of flight schools and people that would love to disagree with you. Overall you sound like a tough person to satisfy to begin with. No offense, but when you knock everything you buy it sounds like a matter of priorities are offset and a grain of salt to your word is to be taken. Um, no. The word "all" implies everyone. This is about as far off a statement as they come. You are in an underwhelming minority of people making such noise...trust me. Please take care in how you word things.

This makes no sense at all. That would imply that our customers reporting such improvements have the same exact setup as we do. Probability: Very unlikely.

How do you get that? It reads to me: Most of, almost all, majority, not all...but most. Your mileage may vary, but I'd say (as have others here) that the statement holds true for an overwhelming majority (and also clearly on the very reviews section you speak of). The wording is very clear. You're trying to interpret it as "SkyMaxx Pro guarantees you 100%, without doubt, improvement in FPS over default"...it doesn't say that.