Cameron

Just like Ben said it would in his last post. You should listen to people if you're going to ask them for support.

If it takes longer to experience a crash then it's not the same crash. Plenty of people flying it now without issue. We'll take a look.

The objective for this update was to get people flying again after crash to desktops. We do not have consistent TerraMaxx issues as we did before to diagnose this like we did before (and solved on test machines). That may change in the future as we gain more data. Anyways, that aside, this update had one purpose and only one purpose.

You need HDR enabled in your X-Plane rendering settings.

1.1.4c was an unscheduled plugin update. No other fixes besides crash to desktop issues were included, so what you're seeing is expected.

Yes. "Workaround for 11.31 crash when FMS returns bad airport reference from flight plan" is one in the same.

Hello All, This will serve as a formal forum announcement that we have released the version 1.1.4c update for the TBM 900. All customers who have purchased the TBM 900 up till now have been sent an e-mail by X-Aviation with complete instructions on how to obtain your update. We have made this a very simple process! For those that purchase the TBM 900 from today forward, your purchased download will already be updated to version 1.1.4c for you. What if I didn't get the update e-mail? If you did not receive your update e-mail don't fret! X-Aviation has updated our system to allow all customers to update with ease, regardless of whether you received an e-mail for the update! Here's what to do: 1. Login to your X-Aviation account here: https://www.x-aviation.com/catalog/account_history.php 2. Find your original TBM 900 download and re-download the file. It will download as the latest version! The following is a list of additions/fixes included: What's New / Changed: Workaround for 11.31 crash when FMS returns bad airport reference from flight plan. Added multi-sample anti-aliasing to synthetic vision. As always, thanks for being a customer with X-Aviation. We appreciate your feedback and support! Enjoy these latest updates, and stay tuned to the forum as we continually announce the latest happenings.

This looks to be Bitdefender or a similar anti virus blocking activation.

No. RWC is and will only be for use with SkyMaxx Pro.

Serial number for what?

No need. There's only one, and only for some people (TBM and TM). Still sourcing the cause.

That's awesome! Thanks for your efforts!

Hi Jim, You should not be needing to continually input your credentials when a check is due unless you have the option for auto license checks disabled (a setting in Gizmo preferences). The license check will only occur every 14 days or if a change in components/operating system was significant enough to not be recognized as the same machine. Can you check to verify you have the auto license check option enabled? We don't get people complaining about this ever, so it's the only thing I can think of!

Can't really see everything on the console window there. Do you have BitDefender or similar firewall installed?

Your screenshots are further showing my theory of the 970s being stretched too far. Yet again, comparing to other aircraft does you no good here. There's nothing applicable from one creation to the next when it comes to what's ultimately drawn on the GPU. Thinking further on this, you said "I did have" the aircraft having FPS that were stable. This makes me also suspect that with the recent changes in 11.3 and the introduction of the particle engine, things are just getting pushed too far. It's possible your better, stable FPS days were in a previous version of X-Plane.

Perhaps you should legitimately purchase the product instead of trying to run old and pirated software that you don't pay for.

I'm not being defensive. I'm setting the record straight for something you said was incorrect. Your assessment of what should be removed is incorrect. State files are to be left intact for a reason. The whole simulation is based on the perpetual state of the aircraft. The installer does not uninstall these for reason, and it never will. This is not my baby. It is Saso and Goran's baby. No, it really does not. Any core files that were installed with the product and are pertinent to making any of the code the aircraft uses are entirely removed minus the state of aircraft files. That is not something I'm going to be able to assist you with. Goran and Saso will do so. Only advice I can provide to you is to remove all plugins minus Gizmo and see how you go. Since you seem to be unfamiliar, please do familiarize yourself with our refund policy. I'm sure Goran and Saso will do whatever they can to help you. FPS are not a guaranteed quantity, however. You already know my feelings on your GTX 970's.

The Uninstaller is NOT supposed to remove or touch the state folder by design. You are incorrect with that statement.

SLI configs like that can actually do more harm than good when it comes to X-Plane. It was never really optimized to take advantage of it and when SLI was the big thing it wasn't uncommon to see single cards beating out performance of dual cards. Trying to compare other aircraft to another really isn't a valid comparison. No two 3D models are alike, and the TBM obviously goes the extra mile in the programming department, which in turn is going to put more load on even the GPU. Given your description of when your fps hit starts, I'd say it's pretty clear what's likely going on.

I would venture to say that running the GTX 970 could be a big contributing bottleneck here. That's a pretty old card by today's standards when coupled with the demands of X-Plane 11. My guess would be some kind of fill rate happening on the card.

A discount was available for two months for all v3 owners when it released. There is no longer a discounted upgrade path from v3 to 4.

@BillM You're using an old installer.

It's towering cumulus and can only appear when FSGRW is instructing it to in the SkyMaxx Pro specific integration.

Because a single case does not solve this type of problem. We need a greater pool to leverage chasing down the rabbit hole and finding the common denominator. I'm glad DreamFoil was able to help you do whatever it was you needed help with remotely. That won't solve this problem, unfortunately.

No, we don't. That's pretty much useless in all honesty. As of now we don't have further answers to this. Thus far it was tested on multiple machines who had the issue and could concur that it did fix the problem. Until we get more people claiming the same as you that it has not we can't do much to diagnose.