Leaderboard
Popular Content
Showing content with the highest reputation on 11/15/2024 in all areas
-
In all seriousness, after waiting almost 2 years, I'd be happier if I just knew what year it will be seen again. 2024 is almost over; what are the chances that I'll see it in 2025? (I'm an old man now and I don't have too many more years left).2 points
-
Nice "update within the next week" without a single word1 point
-
From my perspective, when the TBM was the flagship product things were much different; once the Challenger 650 took over pride-of-place, the TBM appears to be "out of sight, out of mind, and out of favour". I can't speak for others, but I personally have no interest in heavy metal - no interest in poor-quality simulations - no interest in low-performance GA aircraft - and absolutely zero interest in games like MSFS; so for me, it's not a case of "the TBM 900 being my favourite aircraft" as it is "the TBM 900 was the ONLY aircraft I enjoyed flying"; but under XP11 that experience now feels extremely dated. I also have XP12 but never use it because it doesn't have the TBM. So at present I just don't fly sims anymore; it's got to that point for me - which is why I'm getting thoroughly disheartened at never hearing more than "yes we're going to adapt it. No we can't/won't give you a time frame"; we've had that for almost 2 years now - and nothing to suggest that we won't still be hearing the same after 3, 4, and 5 years. I know that having to re-write the turbine library isn't a trivial task, but it needs to be given a higher priority and more resources; I for one would be more than happy to pay full price again for a XP12 compatible model. We've been patient - we've put our thoughts and feelings as diplomatically as possible - but at the end of the day we're powerless and at their mercy. At this point, for me, it's gone beyond disappointing into just damn depressing. Sigh. I'm feeling very let down; it's like having a missing pet and not knowing if you'll ever see them alive again.1 point
-
I have noticed that there has not been any replies to the questions that have been raised in this forum off late ??1 point
-
Let's all not forget to wish X-Plane 12 a happy 2nd birthday next month. I'm looking forward to using it (if there's ever a compatible TBM aircraft released for it). Please Santa - I've been a good boy for the past 2 years.1 point
-
Version 1.0.0
80 downloads
I give you the CRJ900NG as i said in my yesterday post this plane can fly 1,976 nautical miles Two General Electric CF34-8C5 engines give the aircraft a cruise speed up to Mach 0.83 and an operating range of up to 1,976 nautical miles (3,408km). and can also have a fuel weight ofweight and efficient aerodynamics provide the best fuel burn and ... more than 47 million flight hours. ... The success and longevity of the CRJ program can and total weight of everything that it can carry is 84,500 pounds In typical service, the CRJ900 can cruise 8–10,000 ft higher with a slightly higher fuel burn and an average true airspeed of 450–500 knots, a significant improvement over its predecessor. Its maximum ground takeoff weight is 84,500 pounds. 90 passengers In a single-class configuration, the CRJ900 has the flexibility to easily seat up to 90 passengers. This capacity, combined with enhancements that result in 5.5% lower fuel burn, means the CRJ900 delivers the best economics in its class. As of July 2018, 290 CRJ700 aircraft (all variants), 425 CRJ900 aircraft (all variants) and 62 CRJ1000 aircraft were in airline service with SkyWest Airlines (123), Endeavor Air (112), PSA Airlines (95), Mesa Airlines (84), GoJet Airlines (54), ExpressJet Airlines (39), Lufthansa CityLine (37), China Express Airlines ( ... DISCLAIMER: sadely DEU to covid-19 the CRJ900 is dying out of service as for every aviaton plane for now stay safe and happy flying-1 points