Jump to content

Leaderboard

Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 06/13/2013 in all areas

  1. Piggy-Back Transport. Well, if the space shuttle can do it, why not? Actually, I have no idea how this happened. I opened a saved situation file and the helicoptor was not suppose to be there. Who knows. Call it my version of the Osprey Aircraft! Note: If I had my preferences, I would not chose to ride piggy-back on a helicopter! It's hard on my tires.
    3 points
  2. I didn't realise someone flew Erik somewhere today. That's the only possible reason I can think of why you'd be discussing him here instead of posting pics of what you flew.
    3 points
  3. Excelente video, se ve muy bien, y reconociendo que eres muy buen piloto de helicopteros. Gracias Carlos Garcia
    1 point
  4. 1 point
  5. Privilege Style Boeing 767-300ER GE AL You can download from here : http://forums.x-pilot.com/files/file/488-privilege-style-boeing-767-300er-ge-al/
    1 point
  6. 64 bit simply allows greater memory...which means you can load up more stuff and not have x-plane crash or give you an error message. Think of it as a bigger bucket to put more detail in. It is generally only relevant when you load up lots of stuff. For example, if you set your visibility to max, then x-plane loads "more scenery" way off in the distance so you can see it. If you crank up your autgen density, you load up "more stuff"...more buildings, etc. The performance is not all that different from 32-bit. As more and more stuff is crammed into x-plane, then 64-bit allows for this kind of growth. Without it (32-bit), x-plane would either crash or give you a error message if it did not have enough memory. FPS doesn't change much between the two and is more related to folks hardware than the fact that 64-bit is 64-bit. It is a bit different for each. TomK
    1 point
  7. According to their description, they aim for eye-candy and shallow system depth, the exterior models are one of the best I have seen so far, with ultra high definition textures. Because I do not have the plane I cannot speak for the flightmodel however I have heard that the performance and movements are realistic. You cannot compare a 777 to an ATR, that's like comparing Laminar Research to Microsoft...completely off. BUT! The 777 has many flaws in its modelling, such as the wheels are modelled to big and high as well the gears belong in the ER not LR version, the engine modelling is highly inaccurate, and the wingflex looks really strange, the cockpit is better though but still looked somewhat cartoonish. I have more but I will stop so that people won't bash on me The CRJ still is a great jet, with 3d modelling and system both realistically developed, same goes with the Carenado planes however (I think) they are converted so it is in a slightly different category...
    1 point
  8. Can't wait to fly these in the Moo!
    1 point
  9. Forget it. The ATR is in my opinion one of the worst paywares to choose from. (It isn't really difficult to satart and fly but its interior leave a lot to be desired and accuaracy... Sorry it has npthing to do with the real flight profile of an ATR... To even compare it with the B777, sure there are some minor points but the FMC is in a league of their own. In comparison the the CRJ starts to show its age. And the Carenado and the default planes: there is a huge diffewrence. If you really look at the Carenado B58 and the X-Plane 10 model they really look, sound and feel like different planes (although the Carenado B58 isn't officially 64 bit capabale yet, it works fine with a 64 bit SASL plugin.
    1 point
  10. I'll make a bet with you that it'll be released when it's done. If you want to take me up on that offer let me know!
    1 point
  11. File Name: Normals for Mitsubishi MU-2b-60 (64 bit version) File Submitter: Leen de Jager File Submitted: 12 Jun 2013 File Category: General Aviation X-Plane Version(s): X-Plane 10 Livery For: Click Here For Aircraft Normals for Mitsubishi MU-2b-60 (64 bit version) by Leen de Jager Recently a new version/update of the Mitsubishi MU-2B-60 has been released by X-Aviation. This version is for XP10 64 bit only. Due to various changes, the normals-set I previously published cannot be used for this version. Herewith I present you a new normals-set for the MU-2b-60. How to install: Download MU-2B-60_normals.zip and unzip it to a temp folder. Read the enclosed PDF carefully. Enjoy Leen de jager http://www.flybike-paints.nl Click here to download this file
    1 point
  12. Today I uploaded a new set of normals ( including implementing-instructions) to the server. ( latest 64 bit model update) This set covers all liveries and variants and includes some tips for improving/correcting the general looks of this fine bird. Enjoy Leen
    1 point
×
×
  • Create New...