A small airfield - guess which :)

[ksgy]

As a side project next to the Let L-410, I've started a little scenery project.

Hint: leechmountain

Nevermind the runway and taxiways, i'm at the beginning of work, but I will not give the quality below ORBX

(And of course, will be freeware)

[steven winslow]

I'm thinking it's 1V8 outside of Center, Co.

[chris k]

ooo that's very very puuuuuurty too!

Man, some good stuff coming down the piope for XP10 =)

- CK.

[steven winslow]

....and the answer is.......?

Edited July 10, 2012 by steven winslow

[ksgy]

Leechmountain -> translate to german

[ksgy]

Just had some time to work on the airfield.

[Peter T.]

this looks very fab, add oil! and keep up the good work

[greggerm]

Somewhere in Europe, given the OSM2XP usage...

[ksgy]

If you're attentive, you can find the ICAO on one of the shots

[ryancz]

Found it- EDLK

[ksgy]

Slowly, but still going on this project too

 

 

 

[Peter T.]

That is insane stuff! great work!

[Cameron]

Wow. Really fantastic work here! Thanks for sharing!

[TSTLTimLuk]

this in one great stuff.. when it is able to be downloaded for x-plane?

[ksgy]

Thanks

 

I'm not satisfied with the color of the trees, and houses are missing. Also I'd like to add some bushes. So, in about 2 weeks.

[TSTLTimLuk]

then i am looking forward to seeing the prototype of it when it is out.

[Peter T.]

Prototype? you mean Beta? or first release?

[Sgt R Lee Ermey]

So nice and sharp.. after looking at it though I can see its maxed out X10's potential.  Its such a shame there really is no real way to fill in trees nicely.  It always looks like crap if you put the trees on top of a tree when you look at it from certain angles.  It just doesn't fill right.  They need a tree "facade" feature maybe to make thick brush.

[ksgy]

So nice and sharp.. after looking at it though I can see its maxed out X10's potential.  Its such a shame there really is no real way to fill in trees nicely.  It always looks like crap if you put the trees on top of a tree when you look at it from certain angles.  It just doesn't fill right.  They need a tree "facade" feature maybe to make thick brush.

 

Yea, that disturbs me too, so I'll just darken and/or remove most of the trees from the ortophoto layer later.

[Sgt R Lee Ermey]

I as thinking maybe to add a LOT of trees near the airport area to help how it looks.  No trees does not look good.  But as you get higher the less trees you need around the airport.  It is just the low altitude areas.  Problem is when you view it at an angle that is where it looks like crap.  So it just needs some sort of low level models for a thick bush.  I know trees take up processing time so you want to make them simple models.  But if we could make some sort of thicker bush that is half the height of the big trees to fill in the bottoms like a "skirt" it would give the impression of undergrowth.  Maybe make it with a roof as well. 

[ksgy]

In v10 the autogen trees has a horizontal layer too, it solves that problem.

I meant that the ortophoto layer has trees on it too, so it looks little weird that you have a 3D tree on a 2D tree. If I delete all the trees in ortophoto layers and put some shadow as replacement, it should look ok.

[ksgy]

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Edited February 17, 2013 by ksgy

[Peter T.]

Please make this X-Plane 9 too!

[ksgy]

Sorry. Weeks ago I've decided to make this airfield only to XP10. It has much more great features like dynamic lighting, more autogen buildings, etc.

[Peter T.]

what about us? ;_; cant you remove all the xp10 features for the v9?