cromsan Posted June 10, 2020 Report Posted June 10, 2020 With 11.50 beta 10, I lost the control of the plane and I crash. Quote
Marius_B Posted June 10, 2020 Report Posted June 10, 2020 For me it is not that bad, the plane is OK on manual flying, the RNAV approaches are working fine. The plane is a bit picky on the trims, but with some 'fights' it is OK Try with and without the Experimental Flight model, see if it makes any differences, I saw some messages where there were complaints, even if, I think, the plane should be flown with the Experimental model on. I always have it ON and it is OK How you lost the control, on autopilot, cruising, preparing to land? Quote
cromsan Posted June 10, 2020 Report Posted June 10, 2020 Marius, thank you. I lost contol in cruise, without AP. Sorry, but I can not send log.txt. Quote
Marius_B Posted June 10, 2020 Report Posted June 10, 2020 Just something to be aware, it seems that even for the real TBM, if the winds get strong, the AP disconnects sometimes! It happened to me a few times, once I crashed, because I was too confident that the plane is on AP and was not near it.... The other time I got the control and reactivated the AP Quote
Marius_B Posted June 10, 2020 Report Posted June 10, 2020 As I wrote in some other threads, this COVID lockdown I flown the TBM around the world in X-Plane. I had a few very strange happenings.... I stopped in Miami, Opa Locka - KOPF, Steveo1Kinevo's place and I thought to make a quick stop in Bahamas... Arriving at MYNN, I got some electrical failure, the engine stopped, luckily I was on the final, I thought that I can glide to the runway.... Suddenly the engine restarted and landed OK.... I doubt that they modeled the Bermuda Triangle in X-Plane or TBM.... But it was a really strange happening... I only realized that Bahamas is part of Bermudas later.... Quote
cromsan Posted June 10, 2020 Report Posted June 10, 2020 Marius_B, It can be that if I had tried to put Ap I would had save the problem. I don´t find where is the experimental model? Quote
Marius_B Posted June 10, 2020 Report Posted June 10, 2020 (edited) Hi, X-Plane Settings - General Edited June 10, 2020 by Marius_B 1 Quote
flieger28 Posted June 11, 2020 Report Posted June 11, 2020 (edited) is my observation correct, that the TBM in B10 with EFM enabled, does need a lot more pulling on the yoke to rotate? I have sometimes the feeling in some situations that there isn't enough control authority regarding the stabilizer. Also i noticed that with recent updates the TBM became much more sensitive on the yoke. Don't know it it's the X-Plane Beta Update or the TBM update. Maybe it's because XP in Version 11.5 is running on my machine very smooth and with higher Frames. About 40 all the Time. And wasn't there in the beginning an option regarding the TBM that would make the control surfaces "stiffer" with higher speed? Or do i mix things up? All in all the TBM is still great joy to fly in XP 11.50 Done about 12 hours of flying in the last days and not a single CTD and smooth as Hell Edited June 11, 2020 by flieger28 Quote
Marius_B Posted June 11, 2020 Report Posted June 11, 2020 For me, in the b10, besides the ILS issue, I feel that the plane is more 'picky' on the trims, especially the elevator trim Besides the small issues, the plane is a joy to fly! Quote
cromsan Posted June 12, 2020 Report Posted June 12, 2020 My question is: Before putting AP and YD, after taking off, you have to fly Manual to reach the waypoint heading? Marius_B, the problem I had with TBM was not of Vulkan 11.50 b10; the problem was that I had version 1.12 of TBM, that I had downloaded, but not executed, so I was running with version1.11. Quote
Marius_B Posted June 13, 2020 Report Posted June 13, 2020 It is 'healthy' to bring the plane to a stable position, then you can activate the AP, YD it activates with the AP. You can activate only the YD, if you want It is great that the 1.12 is addressing some of your issues I hope that Saso @skiselkovwill help us getting back the plane in pristine condition 1 Quote
Marius_B Posted June 13, 2020 Report Posted June 13, 2020 (edited) I tried a few add-on planes, they all seem to not have any G1000 issues I downloaded yesterday the HoldMyBeer SR22T freeware airplane (it is amazing by the way ) and it has no issues with the G1000, even if it is also 'tampered' The Kodiak is fine also Attached the SR22T approach, same approach like the one having issues in our TBM Edited June 13, 2020 by Marius_B Quote
frododo Posted June 15, 2020 Report Posted June 15, 2020 Hi, Same problem here with the ILS. If it helps debugging... in my case for instance, KOPF rwy 27R shows some vertical signal but not lateral, you can see the glideslope sign but not the 'middle bar' for the localizer. You can also see the distance to the localizer. But rwy 09L in the same airport, shows nothing. No distance, no 'middle bar' and no glideslope. As other commented, I tried in same airport with other planes using G1000 and works OK. Other than that, a fantastic plane. Thank you. Quote
Felipe Mendes Posted June 15, 2020 Report Posted June 15, 2020 For who are experiencing this ILS bug, just go to navigraph.com, "manual install" section, and download the 11.40 database, instead 11.50. The ILS approach will work fine. Hope it helps. Regards, Felipe. Quote
frododo Posted June 16, 2020 Report Posted June 16, 2020 9 hours ago, Marius_B said: Someone flies at Oppa Locka! Yeah, recently got hooked with stevo youtube videos, 1 Quote
frododo Posted June 16, 2020 Report Posted June 16, 2020 9 hours ago, Felipe Mendes said: For who are experiencing this ILS bug, just go to navigraph.com, "manual install" section, and download the 11.40 database, instead 11.50. The ILS approach will work fine. Hope it helps. Regards, Felipe. What about the ones we don't use Navigraph? Quote
Marius_B Posted June 16, 2020 Report Posted June 16, 2020 I also do not have a Navigraph subscription.... Also, from what I saw in this forum, the TBM is not yet integrating the Navigraph data Quote
skiselkov Posted June 16, 2020 Report Posted June 16, 2020 Found the issue with the Localizers. X-Plane 11.50b10 changed one element of the localizer nav data encoding (bearing), which broke the custom localizer simulation code in the TBM. Compatibility workaround will be included in the next TBM update. 1 5 Quote
Marius_B Posted June 16, 2020 Report Posted June 16, 2020 Great! You are the best, Saso! @skiselkov Thank you, on behalf of all the happy users of the TBM, the Syntethic Vision, the librain and so many more! Quote
Rob Laird Posted June 17, 2020 Report Posted June 17, 2020 Hi. Great you found the issue with the Localizers. X-Plane 11.50b10. @skiselkov When can an update be expected. Quote
spence Posted June 21, 2020 Report Posted June 21, 2020 I have same issue... rebuilt my entire setup, then found this thread ;-) Looking forward to update. cheers! spence Quote
rstjernm Posted October 4, 2020 Report Posted October 4, 2020 @skiselkovAre there any news on this? I still have issues with ILS and TBM 930? Quote
armstrongm1000 Posted October 15, 2020 Report Posted October 15, 2020 I have a similar issue with my new StartHot TBM 900 and Xplane 11.50 as follows: When I enter a Localiser frequency into Nav1 ie 110.9 MHz for 26L EGKK and select Loc1 on the CDI the entry goes green but the code for the Localiser is never shown as it should be, and the green line never shows any cross track information. Although the Nav 2 shows the correct VOR code when the corresponding Frequency is entered ie 114.00 Mhz for the UK Midhurst VOR shows Mid correctly and navigation data is correct. I have tried lots of ways to correct this even totally deleting the TBM 900 and reloading but nothing I have tried works so far. I can confirm that the G1000 in the default C172 Skyhawk works fine I understand that RNAV approach can be used instead but it would be nice to have this issue fixed. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.