MaidenFan Posted April 27, 2011 Report Posted April 27, 2011 After reading the post that Philip put up later in this thread, I think my Core 2 Duo might do it. It won't be perfect, but I have a little more hope now. Plus, Mac is supposed to get more frames. Quote
bonfiki Posted April 29, 2011 Report Posted April 29, 2011 Good morning to all, after congratulate with you for the impressive work, I can't wait again...I read the manual so many times I would put my fingers on push-buttons and levers....Do you have an idea when this bird will be released ?Thank you Quote
RafalB Posted April 29, 2011 Report Posted April 29, 2011 I was wondering if you guys noticed that too... (look at the pic)http://img41.imageshack.us/img41/6462/cr2u.jpg <- linkThe glareshield on the real airplane is more round. Is there any chance you could move a couple of vertices up in 3ds max on that part? Don't get me wrong... I love everything about that airplane and the project, and I will buy it no matter what you decide to do, but that part of the cockpit really bothers me. It just doesn't look like the real thing.I'm looking forward to take that CRJ in the (virtual) sky. Quote
Ben Russell Posted April 29, 2011 Report Posted April 29, 2011 Madden NFL, a multi-million-dollar-budget title. Quote
karingka Posted April 29, 2011 Report Posted April 29, 2011 LOL that's a fail. Don't compare that to a tiny glaresheild issue! Quote
Cameron Posted April 29, 2011 Report Posted April 29, 2011 Good morning to all, after congratulate with you for the impressive work, I can't wait again...I read the manual so many times I would put my fingers on push-buttons and levers....Do you have an idea when this bird will be released ?Thank youHi, there...thanks for your compliments. The release will be as soon as we're comfortable with the setup and iron out a few small kinks. Soon. Quote
Nova Posted April 29, 2011 Report Posted April 29, 2011 Ooooh noo...guess that mean it takes yet another week :'( Quote
Cameron Posted April 29, 2011 Report Posted April 29, 2011 Ooooh noo...guess that mean it takes yet another week :'(Not necessarily. It means we need to work out a few small things and if they get fixed today, then so be it, but if they take a little longer...so be it too. Oh the joys of custom programming. Quote
bonfiki Posted April 29, 2011 Report Posted April 29, 2011 thank you for your quick and comforting answer.i'll continue to check out yours websites every minute.... Quote
karingka Posted April 29, 2011 Report Posted April 29, 2011 I've heard how the CRJ optimizes cores, but just wondering if anyone know's how this will compare to the SSJ100 in terms of FPS. Quote
MaidenFan Posted April 29, 2011 Report Posted April 29, 2011 Ooooh noo...guess that mean it takes yet another week :'(Not necessarily. It means we need to work out a few small things and if they get fixed today, then so be it, but if they take a little longer...so be it too. Oh the joys of custom programming. So I'm assuming the installers are close? Those seem to be the time consumer. Quote
philipp Posted April 29, 2011 Report Posted April 29, 2011 So I'm assuming the installers are close? Those seem to be the time consumer.Deployment is a major pain in the ***.We could just give you a truckload of files and a long list in which folders you should put them, but I assume you would kill us for this...But you may rest assured that we all three work through sleepless nights getting this all nicely wrapped up.Philipp Quote
MaidenFan Posted April 29, 2011 Report Posted April 29, 2011 So I'm assuming the installers are close? Those seem to be the time consumer.Deployment is a major pain in the ***.We could just give you a truckload of files and a long list in which folders you should put them, but I assume you would kill us for this...But you may rest assured that we all three work through sleepless nights getting this all nicely wrapped up.PhilippI've had to sort files in the past, and it was a little frustrating. If you misplace one thing, stuff doesn't work. And I'm sure the CRJ has more folders than I first expected. Anyway, I do appreciate your hard work in making delivery easier for the customer. Perry Quote
dpny Posted April 29, 2011 Report Posted April 29, 2011 I've heard how the CRJ optimizes cores, but just wondering if anyone know's how this will compare to the SSJ100 in terms of FPS.Don't think you can compare the two: completely different internal systems. Quote
karingka Posted April 29, 2011 Report Posted April 29, 2011 I've heard how the CRJ optimizes cores, but just wondering if anyone know's how this will compare to the SSJ100 in terms of FPS.Don't think you can compare the two: completely different internal systems.But isn't it mostly the obj's that affect the frames? Quote
dpny Posted April 29, 2011 Report Posted April 29, 2011 But isn't it mostly the obj's that affect the frames?They have some effect depending on your system and rendering settings. However, complicated systems simulation can have a big effect as well. They STMA PC-12, which uses the SASL plugin, takes a big bite out of fps, as does the x737, which uses its own code. If you read back in the thread you will see that Philip has specifically written the code for the CRJ to spawn multiple threads on multiple cores, which, as far as I know, if a first for a plane for X-Plane.Other than what has been posted by Javier (pretty much a direct correlation between core count and frame rate) we won't have any idea how the CRJ will perform until it ships. Quote
Japo32 Posted April 29, 2011 Author Report Posted April 29, 2011 I've heard how the CRJ optimizes cores, but just wondering if anyone know's how this will compare to the SSJ100 in terms of FPS.Don't think you can compare the two: completely different internal systems.But isn't it mostly the obj's that affect the frames?If you load the plane without any plugin you will have the same frames as my seamax or Mentor. Even with more objects inside. So 50-60 frames.The plugin is what is taking the frames, so that is why Philipp made the multicore function. More cores, more fps. Quote
karingka Posted April 30, 2011 Report Posted April 30, 2011 I've heard how the CRJ optimizes cores, but just wondering if anyone know's how this will compare to the SSJ100 in terms of FPS.Don't think you can compare the two: completely different internal systems.But isn't it mostly the obj's that affect the frames?If you load the plane without any plugin you will have the same frames as my seamax or Mentor. Even with more objects inside. So 50-60 frames.The plugin is what is taking the frames, so that is why Philipp made the multicore function. More cores, more fps.Sounds good! Am really looking forward to a labor day full of CRJ flying instead of school! Quote
YYZatcboy Posted April 30, 2011 Report Posted April 30, 2011 You're gonna wait till september to fly the CRJ?? (or is Labour day different where you live??) Quote
bonfiki Posted April 30, 2011 Report Posted April 30, 2011 Really, it will be release on 1st May ? ....oh, no, I'll no sleep tonight..... : Quote
karingka Posted April 30, 2011 Report Posted April 30, 2011 Really, it will be release on 1st May ? ....oh, no, I'll no sleep tonight..... :Hopefully, not sure of course... ???@YYZ: It's the 1st of May here... Quote
YYZatcboy Posted April 30, 2011 Report Posted April 30, 2011 Interesting to learn of new customs. If It came out tonight that would be exciting, but I won't hold my breath. (I've had dreams that it was released every night this week and woke up and rushed to the computer to check.) Quote
karingka Posted April 30, 2011 Report Posted April 30, 2011 (I've had dreams that it was released every night this week and woke up and rushed to the computer to check.)LOL, I check every morning when I wake up, hoping, hoping... :-\ Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.