Kesomir

Here's an example. I have a home built sim pit, and all my instruments are handled by project magenta, hardware instruments, or one of the other apps. For the forward display, the model shouldn't be shown or you have your hardware pit plus another one (although in this case, prop would be good). That's one reason why. I think in his case he said earlier that he likes to use that view for landing.

I saw it while flying the x737 yesterday, looked like a forest fire (on land), but Ihad the option disabled.

I hope the whole world doesn't look like a US state!

Not sure on the law in Auz, but that's not the case for the UK, or I believe the US.

*gets excited* Really want this to go with this:

Eeeek Parse error: syntax error, unexpected '*' in /home/xaviat/public_html/catalog/includes/application_top.php on line 34 Fix the shop

as in one of the default planes? If so - awesome!

The doors open too I must say I think the Mooney looks worth the purchase. It's not at the cutting edge of x-plane aircraft, but that's because this is converting from FSX and that is now a bit behind x-plane. Doesn't look vastly different to the FSX model of the same plane to me from the screenshots - perhaps that's the issue, not enough has been taken advantage of what can be done in x-plane. I think it's a good entry to x-plane and probably worth supporting to see if we get any more. It's certainly in the top end of x-plane addons given the choice we have.

I believe that AC3D doesn't do render baking, but that you can export animations without the issues you have from blender.

Good to hear. Got worried as nicolas was making a lot of noise about it and no peep from you.

Will you be selling it? or is it an .org exclusive?

*grabs popcorn*

I'm not talking about turbulence, which like waves is overdone in x-plane.

aye, you're confusing this with the freeware x737, which is also an excellent project ( I think an -800) and should get a 3d pit in the next release.

I find the MSFS Flight model to be ok, but the slow frames really kills it. That and I feel the planes are far to stable/static/fixed-rail. It's subtle, but x-plane feels more fluid. What x-plane really needs is the excellent camera that FSX has when you accelerate or experience other gs. I know there is an option for such an effect, but it has nothing on the FSX implementation, which is a shame.

Out of curiosity, why do you have two near identical top-spec machines?

Airspeed indicator post 180 ias animation

sully what group is covering living on a prayer in that vid?

Did I read one of the upcoming x-plane versions (maybe the beta) has a modification in planemakler where you can load and save an a/c and it will drop the wheels to proper tarmac height or something?

Glad you got it sorted

Oh aye - I just want aerosoft to announce their airports and sceneries for x-plane.

certainly nicer than current

Appreciated. No rush, yet again due to drivers and an fps leak I can't really fly x-plane. Sucks to be me.

lolz -Can't get the link to work - anyone else having that problem? ;D

With compulsory voting you get a lot of people spoiling ballot papers, at least with non-compulsory voting people aren't forced to take the time out to do so. I appreciate the freedom of being able to excercise the right not to vote when none of the options on offer represent you - would be even better if no-one got in if the majority was 'no-vote'