cmbaviator

i just which the next aircraft will be a glass cockpit, that's all i'm asking for xD

I think the ground effect is well simulated in the 733, except the negative torque applied during ground effect which seems to be too important in my opinion, just need to tune it a bit lower and it will be perfect

the tbm 850 through 930 is I think 98% the same airframe wise, only the interior will change and avionic, you can have the G3000 with 930 TBM 850: 910: 930 : you can see same dimension at 0.001m close + Same engine = same performance. search PFPX in the forum and you will find a dropbox link

i was wondering wy i need lots of back pressure whe flaring, always thought it was too much

its the same engine, i just modified the weights config : DOW.... and add +10% of cruise fuel and its pretty much spot on. someone also made a 124/170 KIAS climb profile and as well 2 cruise profile: Max cruise speed and i can't remember the other one

dont forget that you land a TBM by stalling not like a B737. You should be at 80-85 Kts at 1000-800 ft AGL and at 30, slowly retard the throttle and pitch up and glide above the runway until your speed reaches in the low 70 kt, you should ever hear the warning : Airspeed prior to touch down

it gets off automatically when setting off The AP, I think

ahh, maybe its not implemented yet

i have it on my ipad but it seems t take too much entering every information needed

I use PFPX, much quicker and quite accurate

I made 3 profiles for the TBM but i don't know how to set those value in the software TBM-CLS-E-1.xlsx

i would like at least a big turbo prop like the Dash8-400/ ATR72/ ATR72-600 new glass cockpit)

Yes you can, pref REF on the PFD, you can start/Stop/Reset the chrono and entering these speed aswell

I used a tbm profile with cruise fuel at +10% and correted weighs and its quite very accurate

YeaH thanks.

Vesa, are you on Hot start discord ? Just ordered the CLS-E and a made an excel profile for the TBM ( force applied vs current airspeed), I would like you test it

i was obviously joking but people need to bear in mind that is a study level aircraft not a casual add on like the A320X from aero......

you bought a study level add on, deal with it xD

yes indeed, it's a very sensitive aircraft and if your joystick/yoke has little deflection, it will be very hard to control

Hi Vesa, Are you sure about the TBM, if it works, then it's perfect I found this on the TBM forum : After reading it again, I think it's the OP that have issue with his own software ? I think i'll purchase it mid november? Could the devs give me the maximum force that could be applied on the elevator axis on the real 733 and max torque on the roll axis ? thanks

Hi guys, I'm considering to invest in a force feedback yoke :https://www.brunner-innovation.swiss/product/cls-e-ng-yoke// for the IXEG and TBM 900. How ever it's not yet compatible with the TBM because it needs to know the aerodynamic force point location, something like that to work properly. So I was wondering if it's the case with the IXEG ? thanks

Hi guys As my birthday and christmas comming soon, I'm considering buying the brunner force feedback yoke : https://www.brunner-innovation.swiss/product/cls-e-ng-yoke/ I really felt in love with the TBM and xplane 11, I currently have a thrustmaster joystick which have little deflection and with this aircraft being really sensitive, it's very hard to control. So force feedback should help me with that and also trimming more efficiently and of course, should be much more immersive. However, quickly after the release with the tbm, i think I saw someone posted a topic saying that the brunner yoke didn't work correctly with the tbm because it couldn't find the aerodynamic force point location, something like that ? So @totoritko, is the brunner fully compatible with the tbm ? and do you guys have already a force feedback brunner yoke? is 90mm elevator deflection and +-90° roll deflection, good to enough for the TBM, I recalled Toto saying that in case of using a force feedback yoke, we should disable the non linear control surface response option but it has only 40N peak force and 1.5 N.m peak torque, is it enough ?

the 930 is the same airframe, just different interior option and the G3000 for avionic

good news, will be using fsgrw and UWXP until XE 1.10 gets out or Active Sky Xp gets released I supposed that Wet returns should be displayed on the WRX radar right ?

i think a +10 % in drag should overcome that