Jump to content

mjrhealth

Members
  • Posts

    585
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    11

Everything posted by mjrhealth

  1. Oh ok didnt know there was one I will let you know. Cheers
  2. Not sure but im running same flight, see how it goes today. It was at sunrise but 5.01 had no issues at all.
  3. The funny thing om 5.01 same flight had no FPS hit at all, even V5.0 was fine
  4. Not sure what happened could be a driver update but last version of SMP killed my FPS was down as low as 15 above , 20 when in clouds. Previous version was fine in the 30s. Ill have another go when its cooler and see what happens Log.txt
  5. Do you have xsaitek panels plugin installed
  6. I went to a 2070 from a 1070, wasnt expecting much but I pretty much run AA 1 notch below max, these clouds do make your card work hard thats for sure.
  7. I am running XPrealistic and its working fine, getting 37 FPS but thats only because the 170 FMS steals 15 of them
  8. There is a link on th xsaitek panels download site youll find one there https://forums.x-plane.org/index.php?/files/category/182-xsaitekpanel-configurations/
  9. Yes i have posted pic showing frame rates further back be interesting to compare. Actually do cause minor stutters when panning outside with wall to wall clouds but ok inside, really puts a load on GPU. Hopefully these will be more fps friendly.
  10. I just went from 1070 to 2070 there helped me run AA at higher setting maybe a 5 fps gain, 1070 should be fine but more like 50 FPS. but than anything above 30 is fine as far as I can see.
  11. If its more efficient than what I use at present it will be good, it very GPU intensive, not RAM but performance wise.
  12. This is SkyMaxx v4 with 10700K RTX 2070, plane MCDU gives me only a 7 FPS hit and I have horizon to horizon freeware volumetric clouds. 38FPS
  13. Thanks for this, looking forward, Ive being using this with the freeware volumetric clouds but there is a FPS hit when you have clouds as far as teh eye can see, but it does look good, and thats on a RTX 2070 and 10700K not overclocked better than 30 fps but thats with a plane already giving me a 10 fps hit. Be interesting to compare results. Hope there will be a reminder email go around. Cheers
  14. Its probably not s simple, sounds liek someone has to find a new way to draw rain. Vulcan is good but had introduced some texture issues than need to ne sorted.not just rain.
  15. Its free so be happy and it has come a long way, And FPS hit isnt that big, new thing will take time to optimize.
  16. There is a freeware one that works quiet fine with this, only real issue they having is AA when in the clouds, its come a long way
  17. Another MS update another reactivation. FYI
  18. bugger ye many seem to have run over to teh dark side.
  19. Thanks for taking the time looking detailed.
  20. Any word on any future updates. Would love to see the Jetstream 32, without the wacky joystick config, only thing that stopped me flying it.
  21. Ye gets like that. looking forward to it, being pretty quiet for a while amongst most developers.
  22. I think its a bit like the aviation industry all the developers seem to be grounded.
  23. I have being using Gizmo Beta and so far no issues
  24. Well I learned something, there is very little difference between a GTX1070 and a GTX 2070 in xplane, but at least it is the latest.
  25. Upgarded to the H470 Motherboard, Gigabyte Aorus Pro Ax really nice board, Better power apparently has 4 more pcie lanes than the B460, The biggest issues on boards these days seems to be the Power regulation (VRM) it is where they cut costs
×
×
  • Create New...