Cameron

Correct!

Thank you for your kind comments, and we're really happy you're enjoying this product! We worked really hard on this over the last three years and felt we had something special, and your response here confirms that! Please consider leaving a small rating review on the actual product to help your fellow peer in their purchase decision: http://www.x-aviation.com/catalog/take-command-saab-340a-p-100.html#reviews We'll consider this, although I guess if you decide not to checkbox each item as you roll down it like you should and move to the next checklist, what really is the point? You can't be THAT lazy! I assume you mean in HDR? I agree that this is something turboprops would have, and we'll investigate adding it in. As you've seen, this is accurate and ugly! The Saab 340A variant does not come with a prop brake. Saab only introduced this for their B/B+ variant later in years. I need to investigate this one and will get back to you! It should be in there, as especially the Main INV is a crucial step.

A topic for another thread, folks.

There is a custom coded sound for ground. It's definitely there.

Thanks for the kind words! Glad you're enjoying this product!

Please be aware that such modifications now effectively void your support. This is against the TOC as posted when you created an account for purchase.

We've gone through tons of speeds through the beta phase. This won't be changing.

Maybe a USB key or something?

Because the prop lever in X-Plane's logic does not do what a condition lever does... Not only do condition levers control fuel in a turbo-prop, they also control prop pitch. There's A LOT more going on here than a PROP axis can allow for.

Did you mean this to be in the Saab section of the forums?

I'm not sure if we have control over this, but we'll certainly investigate.

I haven't timed this in a while in sim, but avg. real world start time is just at or above 30 seconds per engine.

There's a topic about this. X-Plane does not allow for it any other way on third party aircraft.

The manipulators are correct. The problem may be that you are viewing these with an awkward angle which X-Plane then incorrectly calculates the axis. This has been a long time bug/issue since X-Plane 9. As for the condition levers, there's a topic here already which discussed the assignment issue should be fixed in the next update.

The Saab is a very complex simulation, which overrides and calculates the entire X-Plane aircraft engine system in order for accurate simulation of torque, RPM, governing, etc. Saving situations will not work.

Read the entire thread please.

We're definitely considering this. A break is in order since we have worked very hard on this project for so long, but I believe everyone will like what our future lineup holds.

This one is pretty easy. If you are experiencing NO fps change, then this would be due to your massive resolution causing your GPU to use up as much fill rate as is essentially present. I don't know your system, but you are really stretching it with that resolution and this add-on. If you "have" to have HDR on then you have to live with what you have. Laminar is not done with optimizing HDR, and until they are, I don't know what else to tell you. It's known there are issues with HDR as a whole. No doubt, it is beautiful at night though! Here's the skinny, folks: We're at an interesting point in X-Plane development. We can either stick with status quo, or we can push the boundaries and show others in the MSFS "what's up." There have been some GREAT simulations released over the years, but one of the most common things I hear about these simulated products is that the 3D is either "bad, lacking, sucks, or okay" and the textures are "not very good". We're changing that. The reality is the Saab has been VERY well received thus far, and we're VERY happy with the sales so far. I have yet to receive an e-mail from any customer about this, and those who have complained are right here in this thread. It's a very small group. Hardware will continue to get better, and we will continue to be able (collectively as users of X-Plane) to adjust our settings for the better. The MSFS world has been doing this for YEARS. Had we made a sub-par design, hardware could get better, but our design would never change. I think once Laminar gets around to smoothing out more HDR issues and how it renders, we'll be on a good track and everyone will be happy. There will be a few bad apples, but overall things should be good. The Saab is definitely NOT unusable by any means, especially with people seeing such high speed increases with HDR off. This alone should tell you that the Saab is not the issue, but how HDR renders and is not yet fully optimized is. I would love nothing more than for HDR to just work, because the Saab has some amazing night lighting with it. For this, setting adjustments may be necessary. I am away from home right now, but when I get back into the office I will definitely test out more settings for HDR and see what I can provide as help for people. If we could control this, we would, but we won't sacrifice the look of a beautiful product that runs without issue and with great frame rates for 99% of people with HDR off.

We simulated the Pro Line II system per spec. As such, there may be features that do not work with GF hardware and you'll need to contact the developer of that plugin to look into it. Jim will respond here. I have only ever seen this on HDR, and it is a rendering artifact up to Laminar to improve when they get time. Considering the A never had an FMS, it's not "missing". 32-bit? Ancient. Time to push people to move forward (developers especially).

Emalice, That's fine, and I understand your side, but again the third and more important manual is left out of those downloads as I have said. Anyways, we'll consider.

Shane, If you're gaining 10 fps with HDR off, please tell me what your actual FPS is? I have the same video card as you, running extreme at a higher screen res than you and I'm able to easily attain 30+ fps.

There are three manuals for the CRJ. As I said, one was left out, and remains that way today. Considering I released that aircraft, I'm quite privy to the situation. Sure!

We'll consider it. If you liked the CRJ then surely you would like this one. The primary systems manual is 209 pages, so our documentation is rather extensive and nothing we went "cheap" on. For the CRJ we actually did NOT release the primary manual, nor did Javier.

No coincidence for sure, but it sure puts a smile on my face to see Nicolas and Co. react to something we do.

PLEASE read the Quick Start manual! This topic is now marked as solved.