Jump to content

Cameron

X-Aviation
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    10,110

  • Joined

  • Days Won

    488

 Content Type 

Everything posted by Cameron

  1. Cameron
    You're making no sense. You just showed me a video of a 767-300, and a 737 NG, both of which have much larger wings. This is not a 737-300 you have shown me. Therefore, what you have shown me is also not a realistic representation. I suggest you read what you search rather than tell me I should search. I've been a part of this discussion from the get-go.
  2. Cameron
    Hey there, If you don't mind, please find us some video of a 737 Classic flexing its wings in the way you wish it to. Seems some of you are having a hard time understanding this aircraft has such minimal to nil wing flex that I'd like your proof of what it should look like instead.
  3. Cameron
    Hello Captains, I know a lot of you enjoy seeing some form of progress, so I'm providing you with a few screenshots showing off the exterior of the 737 Classic. As per usual, everything is a work in progress, but I hope you enjoy! Remember to click on the images to see a slightly larger version!
  4. Cameron
    IXEG appearances are scheduled as follows: January 8th - Frankfurt - FKK World January 12th - Daytona Beach, FL - Bob Evans January 20th - Schieferhof, Germany - Bernds Sauna Club January 27th - Carson City, Nevada - The Bunny Ranch (Jan is unable to attend this appearance due to family obligations) June 11th - Hartford, Connecticut - FlightSimCon 2016
  5. Cameron
    Indeed, those are SkyMaxx Pro clouds. People may misinterpret your title and video to think those clouds are produced by Ultra Weather XP. They are not.
  6. Cameron
    It's a starting point suggestion. A lot of people seem to fail to understand that SkyMaxx Pro 3 has less a memory footprint than version 2. Where they get stuck is when they don't realize v3 sliders produce MORE clouds/detail than said slider position in v2. In other words, with SMP 3, less is more when compared to v2. But you are complaining. You started with "we all should not have to..." But this is not FSX/P3D. So what?
  7. Cameron
    That's the way it works. Plenty of topics about how and why throughout the forums!
  8. Cameron
    Please consult my prior reply with regards to your concerns at this stage.
  9. Cameron
    Your obsession over a stick is starting to concern me.
  10. Cameron
    Turn your digits knob up?
  11. Cameron
    It will surely work with Win 7.
  12. Cameron
    This topic was about an X-Plane.org product. I don't care to comment on the rest of your post since it's a clear waste of energy.
  13. Cameron
    Indeed, they did!
  14. Cameron
    This is piracy. Sorry, but your justification of this sucks.
  15. Cameron
    Chill guys. Easy change. QC is our final step in the test phase of 3D model for now. Systems first. Nitpick after release, because what you see now is not final until it's, well....final.
  16. Cameron
    It's for X-Plane. It is not released yet.
  17. Cameron
    It's more or less buffeting and does not come into play until necessary. TrackIR works great with it.
  18. Cameron
    Built in!
  19. Cameron
    The reality is there's no way to "properly" simulate the lag anyhow. As Jan has said, over time airlines will invest and do CPU upgrades, thus making said systems much faster in calculation and reaction. Therefore, there's no correct "time", and truth be told we're not still in the 80's. We are very much so in the year 2015, where some 733's have most certainly been upgraded and are still in service.
  20. Cameron
    And it would.
  21. Cameron
    It's in the original installer where you select what variants/liveries you want...
  22. Cameron
    You're pushing high poly aircraft and clouds to hit a fillrate wall, so yes, seriously. Flight simulators are not mapped games like Fallout 4. You simply cannot expect the same type of performance, especially on a mobile chip.
  23. Cameron
    You have a mobile graphics chip. You're expecting way too much for this video card, and bluntly, what you want is unrealistic. Get a desktop if you want true performance (and even then you won't be getting crazy high fps).
  24. Cameron
    Surely you're not bored of the last couple of purchases you've made already in the last week, are you Chris?
  25. Cameron
    I don't honestly have much time to start giving breakdowns of Navigraph files, nor does the team for the time being. The 737 has been 5 years in development. At some point in that process some stuff changed, and we've still got to go over the data to figure out if it's an accident on their part or not. If you are not having issues with your tool currently then I suppose you have nothing to worry about. This really isn't a thread for debugging other products!
×
×
  • Create New...