Cameron

It is custom.

Just Gizmo (which he hasn't listed).

I have no idea if it would run, but even if it does, it would not run well. Because of this, I cannot suggest you purchase this add-on with such a setup.

Please test with HDR as well. No.

I definitely do not recommend this product on your computer.

Okay, now that we have this figured out, can you see if it happens with HDR on AND off?

It may not solve it for you, but it will solve it for us. Isolating the issue is one step further to a fix.

There is no solution for this with the CRJ.

Only after you get the requested METAR file off to Frank.

If this is truly your take, I see no reason you felt it was appropriate to bring this up in this topic. You're only asking to derail topics at that point, and if that's what you feel is going to be appropriate, I'm going to ask you to please not do it. While I can appreciate your background, it has no bearing on the dynamics of the niche market we live in. There are many bigger corporations where people do not interact in the same fora as X-Plane type users would, and as such not all things will apply. Lastly, the tone you read is in your mind. If you want to have a negative outlook on someone or something, you can surely make something neutral (or even positive) read in your mind as negative. Be a little more open-minded and you may come to see that. Sometimes people will even perceive short, precise comments/answers as rude. Others will read the words for what they are and understand no desire to be upsetting was ever intended. Please, leave this topic ON topic. Further derailment will quickly lead to its closure. There was simply no necessity to you sparking this discussion in the way you did.

My posts in this topic have no relevancy to posts in others, and while I may be short and to the point much of the time, I certainly don't fear "shortcomings" or criticism. Sure, anyone can go look and make any assessment they want. I stand by my last post. The point here is someone researching SkyMaxx Pro may come around and find this post and go, "Oh no, most customers complain about this and they don't do anything about it!" Context is everything, and that was simply improper context. If anyone wants to follow anything, one thing we do is ALWAYS improve upon. Like it or not, @HamSammich, I'm definitely not out of line here.

What are you even talking about here? I commented on one specific thing. "Most" of our customers do not complain about this. That was an invalid statement made by @poodster and he acknowledged that. No one has their back up at all, and Frank exemplified that fully in his response. Fine to say you have a problem with something. Fine if it's valid. Shortcomings are to be expected in any product, and it's how things are made better. But, don't go posting around that this shortcoming is something "most" customers complain about; it's surely not...not even close!

That didn't answer my question at all.

Does this happen with every aircraft or only the 737?

Define "most". No offense, but I suggest you choose your words a little wiser. I can guarantee you "most" of the community has not been criticizing this. Can you link me to even 10-15 unique peoples posts regarding this? Given our forum isn't even filled with such talk I don't agree with the assessment even a little. I'll leave the rest to Frank. As a certified meteorologist I would say his word will be the definitive one on this.

Yes, this is fine. They work fine together.

Captains, X-Aviation and IXEG are pleased to provide you a free upgrade to version 1.0.5 of the IXEG 737 Classic! Just like with our previous update, we will use the HotFix upgrade system here. Rather than going and re-downloading an entire aircraft package, or having to go through a full re-install process, we will be offering more immediate code changes through this delivery method. In short, it's quick, easy, and kind of fun! Please read below how to install this update! But first, here's what's in it... Version 1.0.5 introduces the following fixes: Fixed 12 individual cases of gizmo soft-crashing related to LNAV/VNAV Hardened the coroute loader against corrupted routes or invalid formats No more spamming prefs file to other aircrafts folders After capturing LOC only, single push of APP will now arm GS as well TAKEOFF REF page not prematurely changing to CLB page anymore Fixed another case of MCP speed going to M.84 after VNAV disconnect Stopped AP turning off the final approach course on LNAV in some cases Autobrakes should not disarm upon brake application when they are only armed No more sound of starter playing without air pressure Fixed wrong magnetic courses displayed on LEGS page LEGS page distance TO precision adjusted for distances over 9.9NM. Fix for ISA/DEV calculation when entering OAT on PERF INIT page. Fixed wrong magnetic bearing and radials displaying with FIX page symbology Display of terrain elevation should stay on map now in CTR MAP mode Fixed frame-rate drop when holding push-to-talk switch Smoother autothrust operation when in vertical speed AP mode To upgrade your aircraft to version 1.0.5 please follow the below steps: Open X-Plane and the 737 Classic as your aircraft In the X-Plane menu bar at top, select Plugins > Gizmo64 > Windows > HotFix You will be asked to enter in your HotFix ID. Copy and paste in the following: 795cbef4ceadcc7692727063afd8c4eb Click 'Update' Once it has downloaded and installed, click 'Reboot' and you'll be done! Thank you for all of your support! Blue Skies, X-Aviation

This makes no sense. You realize this topic is about the CRJ-200 plane, right? There is no free CRJ-200 here.

Where did you buy this plane?

Can you please provide your order number from X-Aviation?

I am running the exact same setup as you. No problems here. Obviously this isn't the place for support from AirFMC though. You'll need to contact the developer directly should you continue to have issues.

Yes, it's real-time.

It absolutely does work. I have been using it on both Mac/PC with an iPad Pro and iPad Mini as test beds.

Please use the support section of the IXEG forums.

That's at your own risk. We have had numerous people not get features working correctly with this setup for aircraft. I do not advise it.