Cameron

To everyone: Tomorrow (Sunday) will be the day! X-Aviation is based in the US, so that is the timeline we are going on here. I have just completed most of everything here, so tomorrow will be final touch up and then uploading for everyone to download. See you all in the air soon!

Believe it or not, the cost is as low as it is because Walmart demanded it to be. Because of this, X-Plane 10 has been vouched not to be sold in that store again, and the cost of X-Plane 10 at pre-order sale price was last set at $89. The final price is likely to be around that or slightly higher at around $99.

He's quoting the terms when signing up here, Perry. No worry.

I think you should quit while you're "ahead" in this one. In all seriousness though... You're at well over negative 70 in the karma department. There's a general user consensus here that you're posts are on the rather annoying or pointless side. We appreciate having members here, including yourself. My suggestion would be to put more forethought in what you post before actually doing so.

Still fact and as was since the first release, we optimized as best we could. This is a limitation of QT between the different OS's. Do not expect any crazy or major performance improvements in this update outside of all the bug fixes.

Performance is about as good as it gets in even the current build. There were slight adjustments for the LEGS page, but outside of that what you see is what you get.

Yes, it does.

More info posted here: http://forums.x-pilot.com/index.php?topic=2335.0

Hi, All, Version 1.1 of the CRJ-200 will be released this weekend. All X-Aviation customers will be notified by e-mail immediately upon release. This e-mail will contain information on how to update the product, and a new topic will be posted in these forums as well. To see a list of the main changes/bugs fixed in this update, please see the following topic: http://forums.x-pilot.com/index.php?topic=2111.0 All topics in this forum will be moved to a new section titled "Version 1.0" to help alleviate the ease of going through topics that are old and assist potential buyers as well as current users to understand what is or is not an old bug, or for that issue, a bug that no longer exists. Please keep an eye on your inboxes and this forum for this update!

Tom Kyler cannot do anything. I have supported and answered every one of your e-mails no matter how repetitive they get. "Buggy" is subjective, and stating each release we have is buggy is even more subjective. To you, this is buggy. To the thousands of others who do NOT have this problems, it is not a bug and this is bug free. I have stated that I wish there was more I could offer to you. I will not re-hash this all out here, Tom. We have been over this in e-mail time and time again, and I have done my best to understand as well as tend to the learning of the situation. I gave you my suggestions, I was unable to figure this out as much as it pains me to say. My suggestion now is to wait on the 1.5 release. You got much use out of this product for well over a year. You were supported fully in that time, and a refund was not only out of the question for basic reasons, but also technical reasons due to how long you used the product and the fact that we cannot refund back to cards after a 60 day period. There is nothing more I can offer at the moment. I honestly wish I had all the answers and could speedily get this done. However, multiple people are involved in these projects and nothing is instantaneous. I don't know when the 1.5 release will be just as much as Tom Kyler doesn't. The best thing either one of us can tell you is we are delegating tasks as best we can while still living as best we can. We'll get there as "safely" and soon as possible. I apologize for your frustrations. Thanks for being an X-Aviation customer.

This was a general blog that did occasional reviews and is no longer active. The site did not sell any of the products in question. The product this review is for is located for purchase here: http://store01.prostores.com/servlet/x-planestore/Detail?no=177

...because it doesn't currently use Gizmo, that's why. We've been through this a time or two before, Tom. Your setup is the biggest mystery of all time to me, especially since no other customers have this issue AND because yours worked for a relatively good period of time before issues started appearing. I really do wish I had more for you, but we went through all the steps that resolve this for everyone else within a matter of a few replies. Unfortunately, such was not the case for you and 1.5 is the only answer I have for the moment. I do apologize.

Soon...when it's ready.

Thanks for all of the info, Michael. Javier or Philipp will chime in a bit more here soon. I'm currently not in a position to troubleshoot this, but will alert them!

Michael, Can you please provide a screenshot of the angled flight behavior, as well as show your legs page in the FMC?

Hi, Michael, I assume you are speaking on the MFD, is this correct? Do you have any form of weird waypoints showing up in the FMC (double waypoints, etc)?

He can't disable the plugins because he's crashing to desktop before it even loads.

Provided this topic can stay on topic, I have re-opened it. Michael, I do personally apologize if any of my posts have upset you (no, I was not told to apologize ). It's been a crazy last few weeks, and we're all working very hard to make things work for everyone, as well as sift through "bugs" that are not really bugs. That said, I can re-assure you even still that not any one of us ever deleted any review of yours, and it still remains to this moment. Your review sits there untouched, and is viewable by all. Perhaps you missed the fact that there are multiple pages to the reviews. I'm glad you were able to get this semi-sorted out. Just so you're aware, the sticky topic in this forum does cover this stutter issue just a bit (not with a listed fix, but with the intention of doing so...or looking into it). That topic is here: http://forums.x-pilot.com/index.php?topic=2111.0 With the new "fix" in mind, I hope you find some enjoyment out of your purchase and that it helps to enhance your X-Plane experience. All the best, Cameron

Hi, there, Can you confirm as to whether this was happening with the old version of Navigraph, or with both?

Hi, there, Javier will be with you on this shortly!

Many a time, both "here" and "there." Michael, With all due respect, your assertions are absurd. You double posted a review. One of your two were deleted (they both said the same thing). Perhaps it's you who needs a reality check here. There's no conspiracy, and there's no one trying to hide anything. We openly allow people to post reviews on XA, good or bad, and have only ever had to delete three for the following reasons (each is LOGGED and copied): 1. Requested by user to delete 2. One was a customer seeking support through a review rather than using the contact form 3. Double posted review If a review is ever deleted in its entirety to appear like something is going in hiding, the customer would be contacted and informed as to why. Such is not and has not ever been the case, and should you continue to try and make such assertions you're going to head into the bin real quick. You've been allowed to have a voice here just like everyone else. You can post negatively, or speak your mind, but the second you start posting false accusations like this you WILL see your last day here. I do suggest you to come up with ANY example of ANY post deleted here outside of spam or blatant trolling. We do no such thing, and coming from a place where censorship was hated, it is the last thing you'd ever see on this site. Not even bans (as rare as they are) are hidden and they are publicly disclosed. Please, Michael, get off what seems like a high horse. I still see your review. WE brought the review into public light, not one of us deleted it prior to your double posting, and we easily could have censored you altogether, but none such was done because we do not believe in it. As much as we'd like to, you are not going to find much more by means of assistance here for your product because of your hardware setup. We have outlined that many times in this thread, and it has not changed. It is completely plausible that your situation as you explain it is correct FPS wise, and I have explained why it would be. Perhaps when you find the time to upgrade your system you will then be able to enjoy the CRJ further, and not worry about X-Plane having a hiccup mid-flight. Your freeze sounds much like an overheating issue, and with your GPU and CPU likely running at 100% (both CPU cores at that), I'm not surprised. EDIT: After considering the above about overheating further, I do NOT believe this is the case. Overheating would generally cause the entire system to fail. I would suggest this part of it be taken up with Laminar and a crash report. We'd be happy to work with them if they can provide additional info! This topic is now closed. Should you feel the need for actual support instead of constantly making false accusations and absurd stories, we'd be happy to assist you: http://www.x-aviation.com/catalog/contact_us.php

No, he doesn't. Everyone else does, so that's okay. I actually don't think he's lying at all. He's got a relatively low end system running a sophisticated aircraft that does drawing and computational calculations beyond what X-Plane typically allows. The SSJ and A380, while complex by appearance, are nowhere near as complex by means of actual plug-in work and features. They rely primarily on altering standard datarefs and do the job well, but they do not have custom displays that are driven by custom systems, which tie in to a completely custom (nothing to do with X-Plane default) FMC. In terms of today's standards and where the future of X-Plane is headed, Michael has a relatively "inferior" hardware setup, and his video card does not help the situation any better. That said, his main bottleneck is in the Dual Core CPU he has...not dual cores in general, but HIS model number of the dual core CPU. There are plenty of dual cores out there capable of running this product just fine, and we have tested this extensively both on Mac and PC. Unfortunately for Michael, his does not cut the mustard, and while he's trying to "help" others with his review, he left out the very "help"ful information about what edition of dual core he has. The same people that were mostly solved with tracking down background applications that were intensive already on top of the CRJ (which uses as many resources as it can possibly grab, especially on a dual core). I'm beginning to think you should heed your own advice.

It's all related to the same issue. Should be fixed in 1.1

Unbelievable. You quote the section that doesn't talk about how the test is NOT to help tell you how it will perform. Seriously, Michael... Even still, the quote you posted up is VERY TRUE. There are some systems that cannot even display the vector drawn graphics. Such a test is made to "help facilitate your decision in purchasing the CRJ-200." I'm pretty certain those who ran the tester and were told the CRJ wouldn't run on their system...probably didn't buy, and as such it helped facilitate their decision and we did not receive their cash! Yet again, we read just a little under what you decided to quote from that SAME PAGE, and it says: ...This test is not an indication of how well the product will perform on your machine, but rather a test to see if your hardware is compatible. You clearly are missing the point as to why people are opposed to your review. You are claiming misrepresentation. That's false. It's right in front of your eyes. We claim nothing performance wise and we state such! Now looking at a quote from your review: "Brought my dual core Windows 7 machine to its knees, even though the CPU tester gave it a thumbs up." The CPU tester gave it a thumbs up? You mean the tester that's labeled as a hardware tester, and clearly states that it does not signify anything about performance, but only compatibility? The one that says this all on the same page that you download the tester from? We can take the heat fine. It's your "review" that's questionable. You didn't even list your system specs, yet you're trying to "help" people. Are you trying to say that all dual cores would perform bad? I personally know this is false, as I run it very well on a dual core myself! Even still, it remains for the public to see.

Reading might help you too. You seem to think your review is justified and that you have been cheated by means of misrepresentation. A direct quote from the website: The process is relatively simple. All you need to do is download the installer for your operating system of choice below. After installing, you'll need to go into X-Plane and open up this new aircraft. The aircraft will be located in your Aircraft/X-Aviation folder (the installer will have created this for you). Once you have loaded it up, you will see a single display screen in front of you. This test is not an indication of how well the product will perform on your machine, but rather a test to see if your hardware is compatible. If the display screen remains black, or is white, then the CRJ-200 will NOT work on your machine. However, if the CRJ-200 is compatible with your hardware then you will see a message telling you so... Want more? Quoting myself directly from this post: http://forums.x-pilot.com/index.php?topic=2060.msg19624#msg19624 You, sir, are off base, and you are upset that people are scrutinizing YOU for making a PUBLIC review. Just as much as we are open to scrutinizing of a product, YOU are open to scrutinizing of your review.