Cameron

Nope, that is an Enhanced product. It works plenty fine there if you do the overlays correctly. Benny from OSM2XP even had a building set for this.

That's definitely not default data if buildings are correctly placed. It's someone's custom osm data (or possibly ONLY road default data) in an overlay dsf loaded (by load order) on top of Florida.

For legacy products like the one shown there you would need to first remove the already included overlays (XP 9 style). Unknown.

No, this is not possible without a lot of reverse engineering.

It's been done many times already and screenshots are floating around about it. The only reason I could see it not working would be due to load order settings. Even in internal tests we have had this work without a hitch. It's definitely not rocket science.

You're in the right spot.

Render engines have little meaning to X-Plane. The sim is what counts.

Still happening. The difference there was rather than the iPad app the actual system is able to almost autoland the aircraft.

At the request of user 'LA', the conversation between he and myself have been removed from this topic.

Gizmo is not traditionally known to have much of any performance impact on systems. It's been around for years. Yes, you will eventually have issues with it disabled and we don't suggest doing so. As this question has now been answered this topic will now be closed.

Here: http://www.classicjetsims.com/WorldTraffic/updates.html

Why don't you try their free evaluation and see for yourself how the performance is on your machine?

Not at this time.

We're still working with Laminar on some bugs.

Hi, Steve, Please see the reply to your support e-mail you also sent in!

Looks great, Pete! Keep it up!

Congrats on an awesome looking project, Parsec!

Because the Falco plugin is not 64-bit.

No, you were banned here for your rude attitude and constant cussing. Your virtual airline never had anything to do with it. Enough.

What happens if you roll back your drivers?

Sure...find a Saab 340A manual and start reading. In all seriousness, though...there's way too much to list. I think the best way will be through video or the manual we provide itself. As we have previously indicated, this product is intended to be study level and mimics the real world aircraft systems. There are no generic displays or autopilot functionality here. We'll definitely post more on this, as it's a very important part of this product.

I wouldn't be so sure, and I'm quite confident the market is plenty there to make suitable profit on these two products. Don't sale such aircraft short...trust me. It's further amplified by an already existing reputation as well.

As a group, yes. But as individuals and previously released team projects they have released a fleet of aircraft over the years. A lot of reasons you are unaware of went in to why the 737 was the decisive product, and it would likely surprise you, though this is not my stage to speak on for someone else. No one said it was impossible. That said, the reality is far more possible the 737NG will not be their first product. Just because the 737 may not be the entry product doesn't mean any other has to be considered "lite." I would find it very hard to believe PMDG does something so simple.

Hi, Xavier, It looks as though you purchased this product elsewhere than X-Aviation, and I note your different file structure. You'll need to seek support from the company you purchased from. I would suggest maybe asking for version 1.4.5 of the CRJ.

This sounds more believable to me.