Cameron

Congrats on an awesome looking project, Parsec!

Because the Falco plugin is not 64-bit.

No, you were banned here for your rude attitude and constant cussing. Your virtual airline never had anything to do with it. Enough.

What happens if you roll back your drivers?

Sure...find a Saab 340A manual and start reading. In all seriousness, though...there's way too much to list. I think the best way will be through video or the manual we provide itself. As we have previously indicated, this product is intended to be study level and mimics the real world aircraft systems. There are no generic displays or autopilot functionality here. We'll definitely post more on this, as it's a very important part of this product.

I wouldn't be so sure, and I'm quite confident the market is plenty there to make suitable profit on these two products. Don't sale such aircraft short...trust me. It's further amplified by an already existing reputation as well.

As a group, yes. But as individuals and previously released team projects they have released a fleet of aircraft over the years. A lot of reasons you are unaware of went in to why the 737 was the decisive product, and it would likely surprise you, though this is not my stage to speak on for someone else. No one said it was impossible. That said, the reality is far more possible the 737NG will not be their first product. Just because the 737 may not be the entry product doesn't mean any other has to be considered "lite." I would find it very hard to believe PMDG does something so simple.

Hi, Xavier, It looks as though you purchased this product elsewhere than X-Aviation, and I note your different file structure. You'll need to seek support from the company you purchased from. I would suggest maybe asking for version 1.4.5 of the CRJ.

This sounds more believable to me.

IXEG has incredible talent and having seen the project in person at a conference I can easily say it knocks PMDG out of the water (yes, I have purchased PMDG products). The simulation is amazing. There are things in there never before seen in any simulation, and it's awe inspiring. I don't see how you can even conjure up the idea that the -300 is the "only one they'd be doing." I don't even know that! PMDG's entrance into the XP world with the 737NG is almost assuredly not going to happen off the bat, and for a multitude of reasons. They are smart enough to realize this as well.

Maintenance.

For clarification...when you say new PC, I assume you mean new desktop PC and not a laptop, correct? This is a full size GTX 680? Your CPU would not be the bottleneck here.

Cassis87, I am sorry you have these feelings, and regret that the delay has put you in a position to no longer consider a purchase from X-Aviation. As I'm sure you know, we are not thieves, unlike your assertion of such in another thread. 64-bit is a big change for all vendors, not just X-Aviation. There are many who have yet to fully make the transition, and each has their own good reason for it. As an end user I can understand the frustration you feel, however, please know that we work each and every day to get closer to releasing 64-bit updates for our products. These updates take a lot of resources, time, and money to create, and in the end are provided to you 100% free. We thank you for your patience, and once you receive your update we hope you re-consider your stance. We definitely appreciate your business! I'm going to lock this thread now to be sure we end this on as positive a note as we can. Please don't hesitate to contact us via e-mail and we'll be very happy to assist or answer any concerns you may have.

Efficiency is up for debate. Appropriate? Depends, I suppose. It is definitely a suggestion I would offer. That said, it's obvious this is not a single persons issue. Carenado products are (presumably) in the hands of many. Limiting your support stream as an end user to one plance when you have forums at your fingertips is almost silly. I often times go to the forums for help on things I need (X-Plane or not) because I know I will often times get answers WAY faster than a company can get back to me. No, but nice try. The primary issue here is that the CRJ does not ship the same plug-in OR activation method between the various stores. File and folder structures are also different. As such, telling someone to try something that does not apply to the X-Aviation version or vice versa is purely frustrating for the customer. Chances are that majority of the customers here in the CRJ forum are X-Aviation customers, and used to the X-Aviation way. The same policy exists at the org for the very same product, and it's not personal. The experience is different in many regards, and as such, support is split. This is a much different situation than that of Carenado products (and many others for that matter).

Looks like a great product!

Because forums are a great source for questions answered, often times quicker than normal support channels from customers who have already seen and experienced these problems...including you, Steven. Try and see beyond the Cheer Team that you have going on.

Definitely good looking stuff, guys.

Highly dependent on your rendering config. Aside from the limitation in how much ram the sim can use in 32-bit, no, nothing else is different. Give it a shot!

Compared to placement to me it looks pretty dang close if not there. As is seen on the real one, the top left goes along that edge.

I don't see the problem...

I won't hold you back... Thanks, sir! We appreciate the compliments!

What Jim said!

Performance for RS products is often times better than what you would expect to find with default scenery. This is due to a number of factors, but in short, it's a lot more efficient than the layered approach X-Plane default scenery gives you.

At this moment there are 24 liveries in the base pack Saab package (passenger version). All will be included at no extra charge.

Glad to have you here, Bob!