Cameron

Thanks for the compliments guys! And the same to the others who did the same! We all appreciate it.

The log filling is an oversight. We'll fix it. Everyone has been pretty burnt out over the months with debugging, so thanks for your understanding.

Most stable for 32-bit in my opinion.

Ya, no idea. To be 100% sure for the future, I would advise you download the latest version from our server rather than what you have on hand. The update e-mail you received as well as the topic here clearly states in multiple places this is 64-bit only. 32-bit will no longer be supported. 1.5.2 contains the same fixes as 1.5.3, but lacks 64-bit support, so use that if you must stick to 32-bit.

Are you 100% sure of this? If you go into your Aircraft/X-Aviation folder you do not see your 'BAe Jetstream 32' folder? This seems odd, and I have no answers for that. This has been tested extensively, and thus far no one else has reported any strange behavior like this.

Hello, all, This will serve as a formal forum announcement that we have released the version 1.5.3 update for the Take Command! CRJ-200. All customers who have purchased the Take Command! CRJ-200 up till now have been sent an e-mail by X-Aviation with complete installation instructions on how to update your product. We have made this a very simple process! For those that purchase the Take Command! CRJ-200 from today forward, your purchased download will already be updated to version 1.5.3 for you. What if I didn't get the update e-mail? If you did not receive your update e-mail don't fret! X-Aviation has updated our system to allow all customers to update with ease, regardless of whether you received an e-mail for the update! Here's what to do: 1. Login to your X-Aviation account here: https://www.x-aviati...talog/login.php 2. View your past order history invoice that contains the Take Command!: CRJ-200 purchase on it. 3. At the bottom of the invoice you will find a blue highlighted link to your update that says: "Take Command!: CRJ-200". There are some important fixes and requests implemented in this update. The following is a list of additions/fixes included: General changes: New, friendlier activation systemX-Plane 10 compatible only64-bit compatible onlyUnder the hood changes (primarily carryover from 1.5.2):64-bit X-Plane compatibility introducedCorrected fuel quantity indication in CDU menuAdjusted APU fuel consumptionCorrected behavior of fuel pumps at very low fuel quantitiesCorrected bleed air indications in case of engine failureCompany route name is now displayed correctlyRemote CDU now detects iPad browser and disables touch-scrolling ONLY when displayed on an iPadWe realize this update took a long while to get out, and we appreciate your patience throughout the process. 64-bit proved to be a challenging task to achieve in some situations, but we're pleased to get this out to you as an end result of a lot of long hours and dedication to the conversion process. As always, thanks for being a customer with X-Aviation. We appreciate your feedback and support! Enjoy these latest updates, and stay tuned to the forum as we continually announce the latest happenings.

Thank you for the compliments, gents. Much appreciated!

Connor, Your feelings appear to be motivated by what you want. Think about what you're saying, especially in your suggestions. For instance, the EMB-120 is 30 years old, and you want it so you suggest it, yet the Citation II is only roughly within 5 years of age of the EMB-120. The B1900 is even older than the EMB-120, and the technology within it is even less than that of the Citation you see being built here, yet you want that. That said, assuming from your suggestions that you are a turboprop fan, the Saab 340 currently in production should really suit your desires quite well. We cannot speak for other developers. Everyone has their own choices and reasons, but you also have to remember we're in this market as a job and do so full time. This means we need to stay in business to continue to produce products. You'll note that the creations here by Goran and Co. do not just end at the Citation II, but as well as big of a jet as a 747. These products are produced in parallel, but the more advanced you get, the more time one takes to do it right, which means a lack of time without cash flow to fund these long standing products. The Saab, for instance, has been in production for over three years, and the CRJ-200 by JRollon just the same. These are not quick to assemble. There's no such thing as 90% ARF (look it up if you don't know what that means) in the X-Plane world. We also take into account the demand in the market. We've now been at this long enough to know what sells and what does not. Some will sell more, some less, some the SAME for less work in terms of time spent. All of these factors are taken into consideration. It's not so much a matter of will, it's a matter of time, cash flow, and longevity as the creator. As a developer, you need all of these things to progress forward and create more down the line. Trust me, the Citation II will sell very well. In fact, right on par with your suggestions that will take much more time and effort to produce (and that's not to say they won't be produced). Just as you feel the EMB-120 and B1900 are still relevant in this day and age, so too is the Citation II, and that is why it is in development. Someday, sometime, someone will pick these projects up. X-Plane is growing, and so are we.

Hi, folks, A small bug was discovered where the nearest airport list was showing incorrect elevation data. This has been fixed. There are two ways you can obtain this (we are still labeling this as 1.5.1): Option 1: You can download just the files that have changed. To do so: Open X-Plane and the Corvalis In your menu bar at top, select Plugins > Gizmo64 > Windows > HotFix You will be asked to enter in your HotFix ID. Copy and paste in the following: 9f34929970e15b8ae15c09c97511084f Click 'Update' Once it has downloaded and installed, click 'Reboot' and you'll be done! Option 2: You may re-download the entire installer as outlined in post #1 of this thread, as the original installer has now been updated with this fix!

No, but you're looking in the right place for it.

Hello, all, This will serve as a formal forum announcement that we have released the version 1.5.1 update for the Cessna Corvalis TT. All customers who have purchased the Cessna Corvalis TT up till now have been sent an e-mail by X-Aviation with complete installation instructions on how to update your product. We have made this a very simple process! For those that purchase the Cessna Corvalis TT from today forward, your purchased download will already be updated to version 1.5.1 for you. What if I didn't get the update e-mail? If you did not receive your update e-mail don't fret! X-Aviation has updated our system to allow all customers to update with ease, regardless of whether you received an e-mail for the update! Here's what to do: 1. Login to your X-Aviation account here: https://www.x-aviati...talog/login.php 2. View your past order history invoice that contains the Cessna Corvalis TT purchase on it. 3. At the bottom of the invoice you will find a blue highlighted link to your update that says: "Cessna Corvalis TT". There are some important fixes and requests implemented in this update. The following is a list of additions/fixes included: Quick reminders: New, friendlier activation systemX-Plane 10 compatible only64-bit compatible onlyUnder the hood changes: Fixed bug that caused a crash-to-desktop when HSI was set to NAV2 and user turned/pressed the “course” knobFixed bug that prevented the Waypoint window from being displayed when you press the “ENTER” Key on the MFDFixed bug where the nearest airports “height” field was displaying meters instead of feetFixed bug where FMS would not track flight plan waypoints correctlyAs always, thanks for being a customer with X-Aviation. We appreciate your feedback and support! Enjoy these latest updates, and stay tuned to the forum as we continually announce the latest happenings.

This product will be for X-Plane 10 only.

X-Plane 9 is 32-bit....that sentence doesn't make sense. Try deleting your prefs for X-Plane in the output folder and re-launch sim.

I guess you should reconsider what you put in the public domain, and how you act in said domain. Welcome back (a month later). Don't do it again (nice editing skills, by the way). I hope that's clear enough.

We will.

We were thinking more like Montana.

We will someday get to SOCAL. It will not be our next release, however. We have plans to eventually introduce Enhanced versions of our legacy sceneries. These will likely not be free.

Sure it is.

Looking good!

Loved it...nice job!

I would be curious to see results of the 780 on X-Plane. While the mem bandwidth was lowered on the 680 over the 580, the 680 still ripped the 580 apart for a lot of things in X-Plane. In particular, fill rate was VASTLY improved, providing a pretty fluid experience in X-Plane 10 on a large monitor...something I can't say for the 580.

The unwritten truth/word is that it can, but it's not advertised as such because Laminar doesn't test for it. This changed relative recently. Nvidia was involved in explaining the bits of weak points in code if I remember it right. I personally haven't tested it recently and don't know anyone who has, but I'm sure they're out there.

That's shocking. I used a specific case study in sim to compare my two cards. In the same scenario, the 2GB gave me between 19 and 26 fps. The 4GB, on the other hand, shot into the 45-60 range. Of course, this meant I was exhausting my VRAM on the 2GB since the boards and chips are pretty much the same. So long as you're not really exhausting that, your performance between the two should be pretty similar (is SOC higher speed than classified?). For some people, you're right...the 780 is a no brainer. That said, I would hesitate against a 4GB card for my situation (bandwidth means squat if I'm exhausting mem!), and to MOST people it's going to be about bang for buck. With the Titan, 780, and 680 all being out now, the 680 no doubt is a great bang for dollars spent. The performance is fantastic.

True, though relatively "negligible" within X-Plane. It depends on your setup (screen resolution, desired texture settings, etc). In some instances the 680 in 4GB form may be better (I have this card after upgrading from the 2GB version...HUGE difference for the settings I run). The 780 is no slouch, and also why I mentioned it. You really can't go wrong with either card!