Cameron

Too much risk involved because you wouldn't buy it.

Makes sense. No METAR to load.

This is definitely not going to be chief among their priorities. By now they already know what's slated for X-Plane 10.3, it's already been put on delay, and anything else is entirely secondary to that. We're talking about a system that has been in place since X-Plane 5. I'm not sure they really see this as their problem. The answer will be in a weather injector. Not sure who, what, where, or when it will happen.

Glad to hear we could make it better for you! Enjoy!

Sounds like you're happy now.

Thanks for the compliments, Kris!

This makes me think that X-Plane is deciding to load new METAR data at this point. This is with real weather on?

Awesome!

I had a hunch, and my hunch was right. A little known fact about X-Plane....Water settings of 'Complete' and 'Advanced' are very expensive with little to no gains. Supnik and I have had discussions about this a lot over the years, and it's actually been considered for the chopping block because of how non-beneficial those two modes are, yet so taxing without people realizing it. Can you please try this at 'Default' setting and see what happens? Your workaround is to first install 1.1. No bug reports on 1.0 please!

Thanks, Geof! We're really happy to hear you enjoy it so much! Your compliments are well received and appreciated, so thank you!

This is telling. Can you please post a screenshot of your rendering settings in X-Plane?

I somehow missed this one till now. Thanks for sharing your results...AWESOME!

Get on it! You're missing out!

So happy to hear, and thanks! Glad you're a happy camper!

There was no transparency changed, and no texture files adjusted. Are you running in HDR mode? This is where you would noticed a change, because the tone mapping in HDR was WAY off in version 1.0, which caused the clouds to be much brighter than they should be. This update fixes the issue and where in the callback/buffer of X-Plane the clouds get rendered. Non-HDR and HDR should essentially be uniform now, where as in 1.0 the HDR clouds were vastly (and nastily) different to Non-HDR. Nothing was stripped in order to get our frame rate improvements. The code was only optimized in how it renders in X-Plane, thus we see huge gains as a reward for hard efforts.

Most welcome, Mat! I'm glad to hear we could turn this around for the better for you!

I know I speak on behalf of all of us involved when I say "Thank You!" Enjoy!

Glad to hear!

Mac or Windows? I am definitely seeing them working in 1.1 on this end. They were completely absent in 1.0.

Awesome! Thanks for sharing your positive results!

Awesome! Are you sure you're talking about the right thing? The visibility issue we are addressing is here. I've just tried this. Orbit textures are definitely working.

So to make sure I understand you, at the end of every 1 minute you get a decrease/stutter and then it goes back up? Mac or Windows? I'm going to try to reproduce this as best I can. I'm assuming the 670M is a 2GB variant? What monitor resolution? Also, in your Operation and Settings menu how many flight models per frame do you have set, and what aircraft are you flying around with?

We don't touch weather injection at ALL, so can you elaborate what you mean by "worse"? Version 1.1 uses considerably less resources due to how it now renders. There is literally no reason in the world performance should be worse or even the same, so lets get to the bottom of this.

Hi, Marty!, If you are already CPU or GPU bound prior to SkyMaxx then you won't have much to gain here. What video card do you have, and what CPU, and what monitor resolution are you running at? On second thought...try a computer restart as well. We just had a user who reported that FPS drastically improved on his system after doing such. Either way, so far this topic is showing that 1.1 is a winner thus far.

Nothing wrong with that! Your choice entirely! Already multiple fantastic reports posted from customers, so I know you're missing out.