Leaderboard

Hotel-thingy just south of LSEZ Zermatt. Took about 7 or 8 attempts to land.

No it isn't. "Erik" has been gone for the past few months, and I seriously doubt that this is him. It is pretty much just Ryan, no clue why he chooses to do this. At this point its ongoing complaining about a problem that was never here. Posting something in what did you fly today hardly deserves being tormented by multiple users, on a problem that you may know nothing about.

(SKPS) Pasto - Colombia

Could you please stop harassing me? You are doing the same thing on X-Plane Paintshop and I find it very tiresome. As I have said on XPP I'm not the person you think (or want to think) I am, and you know this because if I was the person that you believe (or want to believe) I am then there would be proof of that and you would show it, but since you are not showing any proof then it prooves that I'm not the person that you think (or want to think) I am.

I wish the stupid childish post would get deleted as they are unrelated to the topic "What did you fly today?". That being said........

Um, take it to another thread, guys? At least that way those of us who want to see what others flew today aren't hijacked into reading something else.

Yes Andrew's (Blendeguru) proposal is a bold one, but generally not conceived positively from the most hardcore users. My opinion is that, yes blender needs a UI makeover and I agree in the most parts with Andrew, but there are other things I would like to see most. Like baking textures with cycles will be a huge plus in gaming industry. There is an on-going blender conference taking place now (http://www.youtube.com/user/BlenderFoundation/videos) and the positive thing is that at least one of the Andrew's proposals have been accepted. Blender Foundation will create a UI team to address UI problems. Although is not a bold, still is a positive step.

Christ is this still seriously a thing??? I've been gone from this scene for like the last SIX MONTHS and we're still dealing with him?

Hi guys. Reproducing a livery what was in real life on a 340B or a Fairchild, on the Saab 340A , OK. At first sight these planes are so alike , I do not have problems with that (nobody has I think.) BUT...... making complete "Imaginary" liveries..............? Do not expect me to do that. Sometimes I add a small logo or sticker wich was not on the real thing just to make it a bit more eye-catching. That`s as far as I like to go. Last decade I made many ( 200+) liveries only three of them were imaginary or better said phantasy. A "House-livery" for the Project Fokker Jetline ,Fokker F28 for FS9 A Robin DR40 "House-livery" for XP-France Simulation and a "House-livery " for the L.E.S. Saab 340A ( all on request by the developers ) Making liveries wich do not exist ( or existed ) in real life is quiet simple , they are always OK , no-one can tell wrong from right. My only problem is,...............I do not like making " phantasy ". Cheers Leen PS: Till today I made a total of ninetheen liveries for the L.E.S. Saab 340A and I really would welcome other painters to pick up the brushes and fill our hangar with beautifull Saab liveries. This airplane is very well paintable and even suitable for unexperienced painters.

Did you realise you are Erik?

Some objects I want to share with scenery developers. These will be released in a short time for everyone's use.

When you get to the animation stage of things I highly recommend you give ac3d a try. In my opinion it's far superior to blender for that and if that's all you end up using it for it'll still be a good investment. That's just my opinion but I know there's plenty of others out there who agree with me.

I'll try to keep the community informed about current developments and when possible, post screen shots to show the progress. I consider this of extreme importance in our strategy to reach a new market and to maintain an open channel of communication with or clients. Thank you for your interest.