QPAC A320 3D Cockpit/3D Upgrade

[Oliver]

Aside from a few odds and ends, the modeling of the cockpit is complete as far as I'm aware. Here's a few screenshots from the sim!

 

Keep up the good work, bud! 

[czoog]

Haha, I love the hangers in the coat closet!  It all looks wonderful!

[WombatBoy]

So I went ahead and worked on the engines. Any thoughts on these newly shaped engines before I get too far along to go back and change things easily?

 

[PinkJackal]

one question, the font on the numbers will be changed?

The numbers on FCU don't look right.

[jettojig]

Those engines look a lot better! The cowling isn't as chunky-looking any more!

[derekking]

Put pilots in and I will buy.

[PinkJackal]

Don't put the pilots in and I will buy!

[WombatBoy]

one question, the font on the numbers will be changed?

The numbers on FCU don't look right.

 

Do you mean the numbers for the altitude, heading, speed and that sort of thing? Did they look right before? Before as in in the 2D cockpit...

 

 

Put pilots in and I will buy.

 

Don't put the pilots in and I will buy!

 

As far as pilots go they'll only be there for the exterior views. I'll try to make them as realistic looking as possible because it just seems weird to me to see a plane flying with no pilots. There definitely won't be any for the interior views though because they just get in the way then.

Edited August 7, 2014 by WombatBoy

[PinkJackal]

As far as pilots go they'll only be there for the exterior views. I'll try to make them as realistic looking as possible because it just seems weird to me to see a plane flying with no pilots. There definitely won't be any for the interior views though because they just get in the way then.

 

 

Oh, that's ok, I thought that they will be in 3d cockpit, which for me is a no go.

 

 

 

Do you mean the numbers for the altitude, heading, speed and that sort of thing? Did they look right before? Before as in in the 2D cockpit...

 

Yes that's what i mean, they didn't look good before either! 

Edited August 8, 2014 by PinkJackal

[Peter T.]

Engine looks great! Now wingbox needs to be fixed! and then all is good!

[Oliver]

Happy to show a little sneak peak of the QPAC A320 that is being beautifully modeled by WombatBoy.

Please do keep in mind that this is still a WIP. 

 

 

 

[mateoplanet14]

it's only $25

Where dowload?

[Orcair]

Where dowload?

 

http://store01.prostores.com/servlet/x-planestore/Detail?no=509

 

$25 at X-Plane.org

[shishkabab]

 

 

 

 

 

That outer flap needs to be lowered a little more maybe.

Edited August 25, 2014 by shishkabab

[WombatBoy]

That outer flap needs to be lowered a little more maybe.

 

Would you care to provide a picture for that?

[TheSlasher]

edit

Edited August 25, 2014 by TheSlasher

[Oliver]

That outer flap needs to be lowered a little more maybe.

I was in the process of turning to final. The plane was being banked to the left at about 15* thus the need for ailerons. I've included some useful links below,

 

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aileron

 

http://www.lifehack.org/articles/communication/6-reasons-why-you-should-think-before-you-speak.html

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aerodynamics

Enjoy the evening read my young uneducated friend. 

[Oliver]

if he does, it will end up looking as if the flaps are in flaps 45 position.

Judging by the strong lack of knowledge, I'm going to make the assumption that he was talking about the aileron and not the flap. Either way, the flaps are modeled perfectly, and the aileron was positioned that way for a valid reason. Silly Shishkabab typing before he thinks... 

[jettojig]

I have a feeling he really is talking about the outboard section of flap, rather than the aileron; they don't seem to align quite right - which, perhaps, they should, if you compare to this image: 

 

Edited August 25, 2014 by jiggyb2

[shishkabab]

I have a feeling he really is talking about the outboard section of flap, rather than the aileron; they don't seem to align quite right - which, perhaps, they should, if you compare to this image: 

 

 

Thanks, that is what I meant.

Edited August 26, 2014 by shishkabab

[shishkabab]

Judging by the strong lack of knowledge, I'm going to make the assumption that he was talking about the aileron and not the flap. Either way, the flaps are modeled perfectly, and the aileron was positioned that way for a valid reason. Silly Shishkabab typing before he thinks... 

THE FLAP

Edited August 26, 2014 by shishkabab

[shishkabab]

What you could have said Oliver was: The flap or the aileron? Instead you were rude and called me your uneducated friend. I do think before I type.

Edited August 26, 2014 by shishkabab

[Peter T.]

What you could have said Oliver was: The flap or the aileron? Instead you were rude and called me your uneducated friend. I do think before I type.

Its a misunderstanding I think, I think it is better if maybe you could say: the innermost point of the outer flaps should go along the contours of the outermost point of the inner flaps..

I may be wrong, my suggestions could make things more confusing:D

But your wording is sort of foggy to some

[Ben Russell]

Better yet, learn some basic image editing skills and highlight your concerns by annotating the imagery so there is no room for confusion.

Don't give feedback that can be understood. Give feedback that cannot be misunderstood.

[Oliver]

What you could have said Oliver was: The flap or the aileron? Instead you were rude and called me your uneducated friend. I do think before I type.

No, you know why I couldn't say that? Because you right away called out Derek's modeling without thinking. You said something needs to be changed prior to asking whether or not it should be changed. Big difference. 

Want to know why I have 0 patience with you? It's because I've had to go back and forth multiple times with you on this forum because of your childish banter. 

Also, as Ben pointed out, your feedback is still quite misunderstood. Please enlighten me on how typing "THE FLAP" in all caps will resolve anything?