richieflyus Posted September 25, 2020 Report Posted September 25, 2020 (edited) I've been testing out the Sr22 in the circuit as per the Cirrus Flight Ops Manual and I think the performance is a little out. The feel of the aircraft is great, no complaints there! According to the FOM, the SR22 should be 30% Power / 15" MP Downwind for 100KIAS. I'm finding it needs more like 44% power to maintain 100KIAS in ISA standard conditions, no wind. Beginning the descent at the mid-downwind point should be 15% Power and 50% flaps, trim for 100KIAS - with anything other than a very rapid rate of descent you cannot maintain anything like 100kts. It drops to about 78. Adding 100% flaps thus reduces way beyond the 90kts indicated in the FOM for base leg, 100% flaps and still 15% power. These two stages need more like 25-30% power or more to maintain the required airspeed. Final for the SR22 should be 15% or as required to maintain 80KIAS. This again needs more power to stay near 80KIAS. Interestingly the SR22 Turbo gives 50% power for Downwind and 25% for Abeam and Base, which is getting closer to what I'm seeing in the non-turbo version of the Torquesim SR22. Image attached Edited September 25, 2020 by richieflyus Quote
John T. Posted September 27, 2020 Report Posted September 27, 2020 Agree with you. Power settings are off relative to the real life plane. Quote
Coop Posted September 27, 2020 Report Posted September 27, 2020 There are three different things at play with this: There are some slight issues with the current flap behavior, which can affect speed behaviors. There are ranges to these, its not an exact % for each individual aircraft and changes with weight and balance. There are some issues that X-Plane is working on that affects L/D behavior. Experimental flight model should help in this regard. 1 Quote
John T. Posted September 27, 2020 Report Posted September 27, 2020 Awesome thanks. Looking forward to the updates! Quote
richieflyus Posted September 28, 2020 Author Report Posted September 28, 2020 Awesome thanks for another great response. Appreciate there are subtle variations from model model, for example my friends real world SR20 normally needs about 2-4% more power setting than the book, but that's a lot less than the difference I'm having to apply in the Torquesim right now Vs the book I should also mentioned I was flying half tanks and just the pilot, so no significant weight issues. That makes sense ref the flaps, the flaps on the SR's produce a big change, but perhaps not quite as big as they currently do on the Torquesim. looking forward to the refinements! Quote
Aleksandar Posted October 18, 2020 Report Posted October 18, 2020 I didn't really notice the power issue (I fly by speed), but definitely looking for a bit of refinement to the effect of flaps....seems quite agressive, such that I takeoff with full flaps, and don't drop flaps until I'm below 100kts on arrival. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.